Re: [Assp-test] spam slipped through, general question
I saw this on my system this morning (while testing a new release) - but the mail reached the PB and was blocked. Is there a problem with ' exemptions.ahbl.org' ? dig 2.0.0.127.exemptions.ahbl.org TXT ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;2.0.0.127.exemptions.ahbl.org. IN TXT ;; ANSWER SECTION: 2.0.0.127.exemptions.ahbl.org. 3599 IN TXT This service has been retired. Please stop using exemptions.ahbl.org clear enough, isn't it :) ? Now, since they retired the service quite some time ago, yet people kept querying the zone they decided to return a whitelisted to ALL queries so that someone would eventually realize there's something wrong g That said... I don't use that list, so got no problems :) -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] spam slipped through, general question
That said... I don't use that list, so got no problems :) just in case, at the moment I'm using the following WLs hul.habeas.com query.bondedsender.org iadb.isipp.com I removed list.dnswl.org from the above since imHo it's not so reliable (let's say it's too permissive); then btw I also use the senderbase informations to whitelist a number of organizations even if the sending IP isn't on a whitelist -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
[Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13
Hello @all! Actually i have 1.7.1.5 running perfectly and tried to switch to 2.0.1. with unchanged assp.cfg At first it looks running very well but I´ve noticed that the local adresses are not looked up by V2 anymore leading to not received mails for all users listed in file:local.txt. Here you´ll find the Logs: V 1.7.1.5 Apr-29-10 06:10:27 u...@domain.tld matches u...@domain.tld in LocalAddresses_Flat; V 2.0.1 Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] [InvalidAddress] 2x7 retur...@xxx invalid address rejected: u...@domain.tld Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2x7 retur...@xxx Message-Score: added 10 for invalid address u...@domain.tld, total score for this message is now 10 Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2x7 retur...@xxx [SMTP Error] 550 5.1.1 User unknown Any hints? This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13
Set ValidateUserLog to diagnostic allLogReRE - to a domain or user you should see more information in the log. Thomas Von:Michael a...@agrodur.com An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 30.04.2010 12:47 Betreff:[Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13 Hello @all! Actually i have 1.7.1.5 running perfectly and tried to switch to 2.0.1. with unchanged assp.cfg At first it looks running very well but I´ve noticed that the local adresses are not looked up by V2 anymore leading to not received mails for all users listed in file:local.txt. Here you´ll find the Logs: V 1.7.1.5 Apr-29-10 06:10:27 u...@domain.tld matches u...@domain.tld in LocalAddresses_Flat; V 2.0.1 Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] [InvalidAddress] 2x7 retur...@xxx invalid address rejected: u...@domain.tld Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2x7 retur...@xxx Message-Score: added 10 for invalid address u...@domain.tld, total score for this message is now 10 Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2x7 retur...@xxx [SMTP Error] 550 5.1.1 User unknown Any hints? This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test DISCLAIMER: *** This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no known virus in this email! *** -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13
Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the file, saved it, restarted asp pasted the addresses back in -Original Message- From: Michael [mailto:a...@agrodur.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 7:28 AM To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13 Hello @all! Actually i have 1.7.1.5 running perfectly and tried to switch to 2.0.1. with unchanged assp.cfg At first it looks running very well but I´ve noticed that the local adresses are not looked up by V2 anymore leading to not received mails for all users listed in file:local.txt. Here you´ll find the Logs: V 1.7.1.5 Apr-29-10 06:10:27 u...@domain.tld matches u...@domain.tld in LocalAddresses_Flat; V 2.0.1 Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] [InvalidAddress] 2x7 retur...@xxx invalid address rejected: u...@domain.tld Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2x7 retur...@xxx Message-Score: added 10 for invalid address u...@domain.tld, total score for this message is now 10 Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2x7 retur...@xxx [SMTP Error] 550 5.1.1 User unknown Any hints? This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13
Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the file, saved it, restarted asp pasted the addresses back in And what is the difference between the two files (old - new)? Thomas Von:Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 30.04.2010 13:30 Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13 Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the file, saved it, restarted asp pasted the addresses back in -Original Message- From: Michael [mailto:a...@agrodur.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 7:28 AM To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13 Hello @all! Actually i have 1.7.1.5 running perfectly and tried to switch to 2.0.1. with unchanged assp.cfg At first it looks running very well but I´ve noticed that the local adresses are not looked up by V2 anymore leading to not received mails for all users listed in file:local.txt. Here you´ll find the Logs: V 1.7.1.5 Apr-29-10 06:10:27 u...@domain.tld matches u...@domain.tld in LocalAddresses_Flat; V 2.0.1 Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] [InvalidAddress] 2x7 retur...@xxx invalid address rejected: u...@domain.tld Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2x7 retur...@xxx Message-Score: added 10 for invalid address u...@domain.tld, total score for this message is now 10 Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2x7 retur...@xxx [SMTP Error] 550 5.1.1 User unknown Any hints? This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test DISCLAIMER: *** This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no known virus in this email! *** -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13
Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the file, saved it, restarted asp pasted the addresses back in Sounds like the file (or at least its image in memory) got corrupted -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13
Sounds like the file (or at least its image in memory) got corrupted The directory ./files/optRE contains the more or less optimized regular expressions (memory) . Thomas Von:GrayHat gray...@gmx.net An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 30.04.2010 14:11 Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13 Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the file, saved it, restarted asp pasted the addresses back in Sounds like the file (or at least its image in memory) got corrupted -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test DISCLAIMER: *** This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no known virus in this email! *** -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13
Nothing -Original Message- From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 9:09 AM To: ASSP development mailing list Subject: Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13 Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the file, saved it, restarted asp pasted the addresses back in And what is the difference between the two files (old - new)? Thomas Von:Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 30.04.2010 13:30 Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13 Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the file, saved it, restarted asp pasted the addresses back in -Original Message- From: Michael [mailto:a...@agrodur.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 7:28 AM To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13 Hello @all! Actually i have 1.7.1.5 running perfectly and tried to switch to 2.0.1. with unchanged assp.cfg At first it looks running very well but I´ve noticed that the local adresses are not looked up by V2 anymore leading to not received mails for all users listed in file:local.txt. Here you´ll find the Logs: V 1.7.1.5 Apr-29-10 06:10:27 u...@domain.tld matches u...@domain.tld in LocalAddresses_Flat; V 2.0.1 Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] [InvalidAddress] 2x7 retur...@xxx invalid address rejected: u...@domain.tld Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2x7 retur...@xxx Message-Score: added 10 for invalid address u...@domain.tld, total score for this message is now 10 Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2x7 retur...@xxx [SMTP Error] 550 5.1.1 User unknown Any hints? This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test DISCLAIMER: *** This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no known virus in this email! *** -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13
Now, after deleting /lib/Regex/* it is working again as expected so far. So I guessthat there is some problem with the Regexoptimizer. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13
Just send me the optimized version of your flat file (files/optRE/LocalAddresses_Flat.txt). Thomas Von:Michael a...@agrodur.com An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 30.04.2010 15:02 Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13 Now, after deleting /lib/Regex/* it is working again as expected so far. So I guessthat there is some problem with the Regexoptimizer. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test DISCLAIMER: *** This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no known virus in this email! *** -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
[Assp-test] 1.7x 2.0.05 log error.
AdminUpdate: asspCfgVersion changed from '1.7.1.4(2.0.05)' to '1.7.1.4(2.0.04)'; I went from 2.0.04 to 2.0.05, not the other way around. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
[Assp-test] What platform is best.....
I'm having problems installing the modules for V2 on a new installation of Fedora 12. Is there a recommended platform? Thanks Steve -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
What modules? Some are windows specific and as such will not compile in linux. Other than that, perl isn't platform dependant. You can always try compiling perl from scratch to see if that helps. Did you do a install bundle:CPAN inside cpan to update it? Also, you may try exiting cpan then going back in and trying to install modules again that fail. I've noticed that sometimes that is necessary as more modules are installed in a session, for whatever reason. One last unrelated note. You might consider going with a more stable linux platform. If you prefer redhat, CentOS, for all intensive purposes, is a mirror of redhat's enterprise product. Because of that it is very stable. Fedora is more of redhat's development platform in that while it is considered mostly stable, much of the enterprise product's changes are implemented there first and then added into the enterprise product once any bugs are worked out. If you do choose CentOS, you'll need to compile and install version 5.10.x of perl as it comes with 5.8. You'll want to leave both on the system but 'disable' version 5.8 and prevent it from auto updating. If you go that route I have a quick how to I can shoot you. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:12:44 + To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Assp-test] What platform is best. I'm having problems installing the modules for V2 on a new installation of Fedora 12. Is there a recommended platform? Thanks Steve -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
Do you use 32 bit or 64 bit? -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
Doesn't matter. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:05:26 + To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best. Do you use 32 bit or 64 bit? -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
Downloading now, your doc would be welcome... Thanks steve -Original Message- From: Paul K. Dickson [mailto:pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:14 PM To: ASSP development mailing list Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best. Doesn't matter. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:05:26 + To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best. Do you use 32 bit or 64 bit? -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] spam slipped through, general question
Ah ha! Good catch!!! You'd think that they'd simply not reply if the service was discontinued, not just say all ok Thanks as always GrayHat for your insight. On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:49 AM, GrayHat gray...@gmx.net wrote: I saw this on my system this morning (while testing a new release) - but the mail reached the PB and was blocked. Is there a problem with ' exemptions.ahbl.org' ? dig 2.0.0.127.exemptions.ahbl.org TXT ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;2.0.0.127.exemptions.ahbl.org. IN TXT ;; ANSWER SECTION: 2.0.0.127.exemptions.ahbl.org. 3599 IN TXT This service has been retired. Please stop using exemptions.ahbl.org clear enough, isn't it :) ? Now, since they retired the service quite some time ago, yet people kept querying the zone they decided to return a whitelisted to ALL queries so that someone would eventually realize there's something wrong g That said... I don't use that list, so got no problems :) -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
http://www.kirsle.net/doc/perl510.html Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:20:47 + To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best. Downloading now, your doc would be welcome... Thanks steve -Original Message- From: Paul K. Dickson [mailto:pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:14 PM To: ASSP development mailing list Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best. Doesn't matter. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:05:26 + To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best. Do you use 32 bit or 64 bit? - - ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
Cheers. -Original Message- From: Paul K. Dickson [mailto:pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 4:02 PM To: ASSP development mailing list Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best. http://www.kirsle.net/doc/perl510.html Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:20:47 + To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best. Downloading now, your doc would be welcome... Thanks steve -Original Message- From: Paul K. Dickson [mailto:pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:14 PM To: ASSP development mailing list Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best. Doesn't matter. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:05:26 + To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best. Do you use 32 bit or 64 bit? - - ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
[Assp-test] Message score lower limit not observed. Bug?
As far as I can tell the message¹s score matched the lowerlimit, but it was marked as ³OK². The lower limit is 45, and its score was 45. X-Assp-Delay: rpur...@frederickcountymd.gov not delayed (noDelayHelosRe contains: mail); 30 Apr 2010 12:52:10 -0400 X-Assp-Score: -5 (SPF pass) X-Assp-Score: 50 (Bayesian Probability: 1.) Received: from mail.coastingfly.com ([199.231.142.162] helo=mail.coastingfly.com) Apr-30-10 12:52:11 46330-18508 199.231.142.162 magicso...@coastingfly.com to: rpur...@frederickcountymd.gov [scoring:50] Bayesian Check - Prob: 1. = spam; Apr-30-10 12:52:11 46330-18508 [MessageOK] 199.231.142.162 magicso...@coastingfly.com to: rpur...@frederickcountymd.gov -- Message OK -- [FWD RE Confirmation] - notspam/18508.eml; I¹m running 1.7.1.4 2.0.05 Is this a bug or am I missing something? Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] Message score lower limit not observed. Bug?
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: As far as I can tell the messages score matched the lowerlimit, but it was marked as OK. The lower limit is 45, and its score was 45. MessageScoring Lower Limit (MessageScoringLowerLimit) MessageScoring will tag messages with totalscore higher than this limit -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
