I saw this on my system this morning (while testing a new release) -
but the mail reached the PB and was blocked. Is there a problem with '
exemptions.ahbl.org' ?
dig 2.0.0.127.exemptions.ahbl.org TXT
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;2.0.0.127.exemptions.ahbl.org. IN TXT
;; ANSWER SECTION:
That said... I don't use that list, so got no problems :)
just in case, at the moment I'm using the following WLs
hul.habeas.com
query.bondedsender.org
iadb.isipp.com
I removed list.dnswl.org from the above since imHo
it's not so reliable (let's say it's too permissive); then
btw I also use
Hello @all!
Actually i have 1.7.1.5 running perfectly and tried to switch to 2.0.1. with
unchanged assp.cfg
At first it looks running very well but I´ve noticed that the local adresses
are not looked up by V2 anymore leading to not received mails for all users
listed in file:local.txt. Here
Set
ValidateUserLog to diagnostic
allLogReRE - to a domain or user
you should see more information in the log.
Thomas
Von:Michael a...@agrodur.com
An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 30.04.2010 12:47
Betreff:[Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1
Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the file,
saved it, restarted asp pasted the addresses back in
-Original Message-
From: Michael [mailto:a...@agrodur.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 7:28 AM
To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the
file, saved it, restarted asp pasted the addresses back in
And what is the difference between the two files (old - new)?
Thomas
Von:Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm
An: ASSP development mailing list
Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared
the file, saved it, restarted asp pasted the addresses back in
Sounds like the file (or at least its image in memory) got corrupted
--
Sounds like the file (or at least its image in memory) got corrupted
The directory ./files/optRE contains the more or less optimized
regular expressions (memory) .
Thomas
Von:GrayHat gray...@gmx.net
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum:
Nothing
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 9:09 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13
Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the
Now, after deleting /lib/Regex/* it is working again as expected so far. So I
guessthat there is some problem with the Regexoptimizer.
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Just send me the optimized version of your flat file
(files/optRE/LocalAddresses_Flat.txt).
Thomas
Von:Michael a...@agrodur.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 30.04.2010 15:02
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working
AdminUpdate: asspCfgVersion changed from '1.7.1.4(2.0.05)' to
'1.7.1.4(2.0.04)';
I went from 2.0.04 to 2.0.05, not the other way around.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
I'm having problems installing the modules for V2 on a new installation of
Fedora 12. Is there a recommended platform?
Thanks
Steve
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
What modules? Some are windows specific and as such will not compile in
linux. Other than that, perl isn't platform dependant. You can always try
compiling perl from scratch to see if that helps.
Did you do a install bundle:CPAN inside cpan to update it? Also, you may
try exiting cpan then
Do you use 32 bit or 64 bit?
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Doesn't matter.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
From: Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm
Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list
Downloading now, your doc would be welcome...
Thanks
steve
-Original Message-
From: Paul K. Dickson [mailto:pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:14 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.
Doesn't matter.
Paul
Ah ha! Good catch!!!
You'd think that they'd simply not reply if the service was
discontinued, not just say all ok
Thanks as always GrayHat for your insight.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:49 AM, GrayHat gray...@gmx.net wrote:
I saw this on my system this morning (while testing a new
http://www.kirsle.net/doc/perl510.html
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
From: Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm
Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list
Cheers.
-Original Message-
From: Paul K. Dickson [mailto:pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 4:02 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.
http://www.kirsle.net/doc/perl510.html
Paul K. Dickson
Systems
As far as I can tell the message¹s score matched the lowerlimit, but it was
marked as ³OK². The lower limit is 45, and its score was 45.
X-Assp-Delay: rpur...@frederickcountymd.gov not delayed (noDelayHelosRe
contains: mail); 30 Apr 2010 12:52:10 -0400
X-Assp-Score: -5 (SPF pass)
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
As far as I can tell the messages score matched the lowerlimit, but
it was
marked as OK. The lower limit is 45, and its score was 45.
MessageScoring Lower Limit (MessageScoringLowerLimit)
MessageScoring will tag messages
22 matches
Mail list logo
