1)
The digit represent days not hours - no way to change this.
You may write your own "post filter" in 'lib/BlockReport/modify.pm'.
2)
If a block report is requested (per mail) for a specific address or group
of addresses, the report will show that there is no mail blocked (if so).
Scheduled block reports will skip an address, if no blocked mail is found.
The BR-filter works as "just in time filter" not as a "post filter" - the
complete lines in the maillog.txt (bmaillog.txt) are ignored.
3)
block report shows blocked mails (as the name supposes). If HMM/Bayesian
are set to test mode, the mails will be delivered to the users. They
should classify them and report them if required.
The default setup is to use the short 'bmaillog.txt' for the block reports
to speedup processing. Lines for test mode mails are not stored there.
Thomas
Von: Colin <colin.war...@gmail.com>
An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 08.08.2017 09:36
Betreff: [Assp-test] Block Reports and filtering
Hi,
Further to my emails on the user list regarding trying to get our
HMM/Bayes working better I have turned on blocking and am doing my best
to keep on top of reclassifying mistakes.
As a result I've got a block report coming to me every 4 hours of
everything that has been blocked which leads me to 3 issues.
1) Although the frequency is set to 4 hours there is no way I can set it
to only report on last then 1 day - it appears fractions are ignored in
the report request. Would it be possible to have the report request
process the first digit after the decimal? At least then I'd be able to
generate reports an specify it in 2.4 hour blocks rather than 24 hour
blocks.
2) I've filtered out none bayes/hmm blocks. When an email address has a
blocked message, the header for that email address is included in the
report even when all of the emails have been filtered from the display
and it says "found no blocked messages". Would it be possible to have
the header for each email address included only if there are blocked
messages to be displayed on the report?
3) Finally, I have two particular customers who were being affected
badly by HMM/Bayes blocks so I have had to set them as test mode for
HMM/Bayes. Unfortunately this means that they don't appear on the block
report so I can't correct the mistakes. I would like to suggest that if
anything is set on test mode such as this there needs to be an admin
report so that work can be done to get them off test mode. This could be
as simple as including them on the block report with something to
identify them as test mode. Leaving as is will be training the database
the wrong way and my only options are to grep the mail logs or trawl
through the spam corpus looking for anything out of place.
All the best,
Colin Waring.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
