I just had a thought I've been getting tons of spam over the last few
months, that I still have in my email client's spam folder (just haven't
gotten around to deleting it). Probably have over 30 or 40K spam msgs. Can
I just take those and copy them all directly into the spam/ directory t
> But just wait, my book "ASSP For Dummies" will hit the shelfs shortly,
> price is just 79$ for US citizen or 49 Euro for everybody else.
>Ha! I protest! What's with the anti-americanism? Or is it because most
of the worlds spam originates here? ;)
Its because we can afford it ;)
-
> > The survey takes only 30 seconds. The survey takes only 30 seconds.
>
>http://www.junkfax.org/fax/spam/SpamFilterUserSurvey.htm
Ok, I did my duty here :)
Even if ASSP might be of the most efficient filters that exists right
now it probably wont reach up to the top. This because the user
Alright. Maybe it's because it's Friday night and the dense-cap is back on
again, but I'm having trouble figuring out the diff between the
"ISP/Secondary MX Servers" list and the "Accept All Mail" list.
Is the only difference that mail that comes from Accept All Mail servers
automatically get
which OS and which version of the Net-DNS module are you running?
--
ME2 (mobile)
-Original Message-
From: "Cameron Biggart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, Dec 1, 2006 5:47 pm
Subject: [Assp-user] Still having problems with RBL
Hi all,
I'm still running 1.2.5(2) (I can't get any of
Hi all,
I'm still running 1.2.5(2) (I can't get any of the 1.2.6 builds to run for
more than 40 seconds) but RBL doesn't seem to be working - here is a typical
snip of the log for a mail transaction:
Dec-2-06 09:44:38 Connected: 220.233.0.8:50570 -> 128.1.1.100:25 ->
128.1.1.100:8125
Dec-2-06
At 12:59 PM 12/1/2006, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> >The connections show usually 4-5 connections, none of which are the
> >ones being limited, usually.
>
>what version are you running?
The most recent. 1.2.5(2).
-
Take Surveys
- Original Message -
From: "Matti Haack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy"
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] IMail User/domain scavenging script for local
usersand local domains
> Guten Tag Cameron Bi
> But just wait, my book "ASSP For Dummies" will hit the shelfs shortly,
> price is just 79$ for US citizen or 49 Euro for everybody else.
Ha! I protest! What's with the anti-americanism? Or is it because most
of the worlds spam originates here? ;)
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
JunkFax.org is having spam filter survey:
>
> Which spam filters work the best in real life use? Take our 30
> second spam filter survey.
>
> We all hate spam. But there is so much vendor hype, we decided to
> survey the users of these products and find out what the users of
> these filters
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> Just ask
>> Fritz if all he runs are the default settings for instance.
>
> Yes, I run the default settings in production.
>
> But just wait, my book "ASSP For Dummies" will hit the shelfs shortly,
> price is just 79$ for US citizen or 49 Euro for everybody else.
>
> F
>>Or is this entirely intentional, assuming that all outgoing mail is
>>valid
>>and thus, should contribute to the /notspam corpus?
>
> That is intentionally.
> You can reduce that by red and np and the logging frequency.
Perfect. Thanks for confirming. I thought I was going nuts for a moment
l
"Eric B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreibt:
>Or is this entirely intentional, assuming that all outgoing mail is
>valid
>and thus, should contribute to the /notspam corpus?
That is intentionally.
You can reduce that by red and np and the logging frequency.
--
Hi,
I'm looking at my logs, and noticing that outgoing mail (except those with
addresses on the NP lists) are getting copied into the /notspam directory.
I had originally thought that the logging settings controlled what would get
copied in the /notspam directory, but it seems that even though
>> What is the simplest way to revert to the 0.57 version (as a Perl
>> newbie)? - the only thing I can find is how to upgrade to the latest
>> version, not how to downgrade to an older version.
>
> This link http://ppm.activestate.com/PPMPackages/ has the older package
> versions. Add a local dir
For whom ASSP is mainly addressed to, I would suggest you only write a
pamphlet...and even then most wouldn't read it :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: December 1, 2006 12:46 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users
>The connections show usually 4-5 connections, none of which are the
>ones being limited, usually.
what version are you running?
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel an
>Just ask
>Fritz if all he runs are the default settings for instance.
Yes, I run the default settings in production.
But just wait, my book "ASSP For Dummies" will hit the shelfs shortly,
price is just 79$ for US citizen or 49 Euro for everybody else.
Fritz
Donnie Bachan (Island Wizards) wrote:
> Thanks very muchI really needed it more as a guideline so I will
> experiment with it and see how it goesThanks again...
You're welcome. Feel free to ask questions. Sorry for the bad
grammar/spelling in some spots, but I was typing very hastily at
Thanks very muchI really needed it more as a guideline so I will
experiment with it and see how it goesThanks again...
Donnie Bachan
Island Wizards
P: 516-992-1658
C: 646-696-1366
W: www.islandwizards.com
Get Your Mary Kay Cosmetics at http://www.marykay.com/malikab
-Original Messag
Andrew Macpherson wrote:
> This has not been my experience. I'm confused but delighted that you
> report otherwise. SpamCop themselves have made that claim from time to
> time
> over the past few years, and from time to time anti-spam activists have
> demonstrated that claim to remain false.
>
Scott MacLean wrote:
> At 07:09 PM 11/30/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What is the simplest way to revert to the 0.57 version (as a Perl
> newbie)? - the only thing I can find is how to upgrade to the latest
> version, not how to downgrade to an older version.
This link http://ppm.activestate
--On Friday, December 01, 2006 13:01:23 -0500 Micheal Espinola Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| SpamCop doesn't have an unverified
| hair-trigger. It takes *multiple* reports to get added to the SCBL
| list.
This has not been my experience. I'm confused but delighted that you
report otherwis
I thought of that too, I have it set at 30, no effect.
At 09:39 AM 12/1/2006, Doug Traylor wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Scott MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >I have a serious problem with my ASSP installation that I can't seem
> > to figure out.
>
>What do you have "SMTP Idle Time
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Habeas was the only one who could sue spammer because of nfringe Habeas
> copyrights and trademarks
>
>
> Habeas is/was a normaö rbl.
Ahh, right. I just re-read some things, and I see now that "IP
addresses of those who infringe Habeas copyrights and trademarks"
act
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 1 Dec 2006 at 16:40, Andrew Macpherson wrote:
>
>
>> One should also remove Spamcop. It has an unverified hair-trigger, and
>> documents itself as being unsuitable for use in a mail-filter context
>>
>
> I agree, but many may not, and I think this highlights
The connections show usually 4-5 connections, none of which are the
ones being limited, usually.
When I got it to happen from my own IP, and I could establish two
simultaneous connections from my IP (but no more) those two
connections would show up on the connections screen.
At 03:13 AM 12/1/
Donnie Bachan (Island Wizards) wrote:
> Micheal,
>
> Can you share those RegExs?
>
> Thanks much.
I have been meaning to finish a wiki article about it, but I have fallen
behind on it. I'll post them here for now. I was really hoping to have
properly comment them, because some of the things I
Micheal,
Can you share those RegExs?
Thanks much.
Best Regards,
Donnie Bachan
Island Wizards
P: 516-992-1658
C: 646-696-1366
W: www.islandwizards.com
Get Your Mary Kay Cosmetics at http://www.marykay.com/malikab
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On 1 Dec 2006 at 16:40, Andrew Macpherson wrote:
> One should also remove Spamcop. It has an unverified hair-trigger, and
> documents itself as being unsuitable for use in a mail-filter context
I agree, but many may not, and I think this highlights the dangers of putting a
list of
'recommend
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>"The Habeas
>Infringers List (ÄúHILÄù), which is a DNS-based list of the IP
>addresses
>of those who infringe Habeas copyrights and trademarks."
>
>Based on that quote, I think it should be removed from the interface
>as
>>Ahh, I see.
>>
>>Could this be anything to do with the NET::DNS v0.59 problem? Some
>>people have reported strange
>>results when using that version on windows.
>
> What is the simplest way to revert to the 0.57 version (as a Perl
> newbie)? - the only thing I can find is how to upgrade to the l
Andrew Macpherson wrote:
>
> --On Friday, December 01, 2006 08:23:29 -0800 Kevin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> |
> | Agreed, we need a "recommended settings" article with suggestions and
> | solutions for common needs that people look to ASSP for.
>
> I think you're missing something here.
Andrew Macpherson wrote:
> --On Friday, December 01, 2006 11:32:08 -0500 Micheal Espinola Jr
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |
> | Based on that quote, I think it should be removed from the interface as
> | a suggested provider to use.
>
> One should also remove Spamcop. It has an unverified hair
--On Friday, December 01, 2006 11:32:08 -0500 Micheal Espinola Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| Based on that quote, I think it should be removed from the interface as
| a suggested provider to use.
One should also remove Spamcop. It has an unverified hair-trigger, and
documents itself as b
--On Friday, December 01, 2006 08:23:29 -0800 Kevin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| Agreed, we need a "recommended settings" article with suggestions and
| solutions for common needs that people look to ASSP for.
I think you're missing something here. There are default values. The BSD
port f
I am going through them all and am documenting them, with notations, on
the wiki page:
http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/DNSBL
Coming across hil.habeas.com, I dont understand why its listed in the
ASSP providers list. After some research, I found that, "The Habeas
Infringers List (“HIL”), which
>once you understood what the general concept
The *general* concept never changed, all is described in the docs.
Someone just should change this "outdated" to "core" documentation and
you have it. But nobody bothers to read it.
My way of communication is the GUI.
fritz
-
eric B. wrote:
> Being a rather new to ASSP, I will take a look at the interface as well and
> point out where I find/found it unclear. Maybe someone else will be able to
> pick up on the thread afterwards for additional clarification. Overall,
> however, I have to say that in general, I didn't f
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>Gimme a couple of days and I'll go through it as well, and post back
>my
>comments/thoughts here.
Please no additional work. I need support in expanding the GUI - not
comments.
fritz
--
>Personally, what I would like to see is the guy descriptions shortened
>and have links to ASSP documentation. I think that would be easier to
>maintain.
That is not what I think.
But you are invited to give me any link to any documentation I should
built in.
And all others please go on, if y
>> It would be nice, if some people (Doug??))), would pick some part of
>> the GUI and expand it, so that fewer questions arise. Just copy that
>> part and send me the expanded part.
>> Thanks.
>
> Who? Me?
>
> I'll see what I can do. :o)
Being a rather new to ASSP, I will take a look at
Guy Deslauriers wrote:
> Fritz
>
> I'll take a shot at this portion of the GUI, should any questions for
> clarification arises, be indulgent 'cause I've been using ASSP for a
little
> more than 2 months.
Before either of you (or anyone else) get started on this, please
email me off-list. I
Fritz
I'll take a shot at this portion of the GUI, should any questions for
clarification arises, be indulgent 'cause I've been using ASSP for a little
more than 2 months.
Thanks
What's your ETA on this???
gd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
- Original Message -
From: "Fritz Borgstedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Assp-user] Help! Please! 1
> It would be nice, if some people (Doug??))), would pick some part of
> the GUI and expand it, so that fewer questions arise. Just copy that
> part and send me the expanded part.
> Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Scott MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I have a serious problem with my ASSP installation that I can't seem
> to figure out.
What do you have "SMTP Idle Timeout" set to?
If nothing, set it to "60".
Doug
---
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>What I am looking for is *someway* to tell ASSP that the message has
>been rejcted by SA, and that ASSP should drop all whitelisting
>information on that network (I have the *Netblocks options turned on)
>and host.
may be
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Please make your configuration clearer.
>
>
Um..
64.72.x.y:25 [ASSP] -> 127.0.0.1:25 [Exim]
[Exim] has the exiscan patch in it so it can talk directly to
spamassasin and clamd
In my exim config I have acl_smtp_data defined as going to acl_check_data:
###
### START A
Will do, thanks.
--
ME2 (mobile)
-Original Message-
From: "Fritz Borgstedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, Dec 1, 2006 4:14 am
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] bug: PB scoring and logging issue when essage is NP
and fails
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schre
It would be nice, if some people (Doug??))), would pick some part of
the GUI and expand it, so that fewer questions arise. Just copy that
part and send me the expanded part.
Thanks.
[0,0,0,'heading','Experimental'],
[baysConfidence,'Bayesian Confidence
Level',3,textinput,'','(.*)',undef,'Spam-Mail
It would be nice, if some people (Doug??))), would pick some part of
the GUI and expand it, so that fewer questions arise. Just copy that
part and send me the expanded part.
Thanks.
[0,0,0,'heading','RBL'],
[ValidateRBL,'Enable Realtime Blacklist
Validation',0,checkbox,1,'(.*)',updateRBL,
'Sende
It would be nice, if some people (Doug??))), would pick some part of
the GUI and expand it, so that fewer questions arise. Just copy that
part and send me the expanded part.
Thanks.
[0,0,0,'heading','Validate Sender'],
[denySenderRe,'Expression to Identify Sender You Want To Block at Any
Cost*',60
Yeah, I noticed that too. My original start.dat had that in there, from
pre v1.0. At some point someone changed it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Graziano
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 2:23 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of AS
It would be nice, if some people (Doug??))), would pick some part of
the GUI and expand it, so that fewer questions arise. Just copy that
part and send me the expanded part.
Thanks.
[0,0,0,'heading','Network Setup'],
# except for the heading lines, all config lines have the following:
# $name,$
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>2.
>
>James.
No, there are options to force otherwise.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and
Look into the code. You are joking, right?
fritz
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through bri
On 01/12/2006, at 11:26 PM, Graziano wrote:
> Thank you ,
>
> another question please , to understand well how works assp . If assp
> receive a whitelist email
>
> 1) assp executes bayes , HELO , SPF and RBL checks and then bypass
> them
> because whitelisted
>
> OR
>
> 2) assp bypass all filt
Thank you ,
another question please , to understand well how works assp . If assp
receive a whitelist email
1) assp executes bayes , HELO , SPF and RBL checks and then bypass them
because whitelisted
OR
2) assp bypass all filters and process the email immediately .
I am asking this because
Please make your configuration clearer.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>Hello
>
>The email on whitelist bypass also HELO , SPF and RBL checks ?
>Or the email on whitelist works(bypass) only with Bayesian filter ?.
>
>
>Thank you
>Graziano
Graziano, it would be nice if you read the web GUI. You w
Hello all,
I really like the assp package, but I'm having a *heck* of a time trying
to get it to do any bayes things successfully..
- So to stop the phone calls; it's been disabled -
With the greylisting in place the boxes are now able to keep up the
demand/load that SA puts on them.
I found th
Hello
The email on whitelist bypass also HELO , SPF and RBL checks ?
Or the email on whitelist works(bypass) only with Bayesian filter ?.
Thank you
Graziano
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceF
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>While if I set score "1" for these 2 HELO checks , assp will block
>email
>without assigning
>a score , so it will never go on black PB .
>
>Is it right/correct ?
No.
Blocking includes scoring, at least it is meant to do i
Thank you .
If I set score "3" for these 2 HELO checks , assp will assign a score
only for PB , so
after some time the sender using a wrong HELO will be on black PB .
While if I set score "1" for these 2 HELO checks , assp will block email
without assigning
a score , so it will never go on bla
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>OK. Just to confirm: something that is an NP match will always get
>its
>IP PB White listed, and never removed or scored Black ?
That was the idea. After you mentioned it, I changed it to: If you
explicitly ignore NP and SP
Guten Tag Cameron Biggart,
am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2006 um 04:37 schrieben Sie:
CB> After not being able to get Matti's iMail vbscript to run on my server I
CB> tried to hack it to see where it was breaking.
CB>
CB> The version I have running at my site
CB> (12 domains & 392 users/aliases) is a s
On 30 Nov 2006 at 21:34, Scott MacLean wrote:
What does the connections screen shaow when this is happening?
paul
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
Graziano wrote:
> Hello
>
> anyone can explain me what is the difference between
>
> Validate Format of HELOs
> If activated, the HELO is checked against the expression below
>
If the Regular Expression matches, the HELO is validated as being ok.
Meaning it *wont* be blocked.
> and
>
> Invali
68 matches
Mail list logo
