Kevin wrote:
> Interesting. I didn't even think of that!
> I'll have to add that to the URIBL FAQ as I'm sure someone else will
> have this issue in the future.
I think this should go into the generic FAQ. This can be applicable to
most any form of blocking by ASSP where the spam is added to the
Evan wrote:
> Well I can close out my own mystery on this one. Failed to realize that ASSP
> only stores part of the failed message in the spam folder head>. So, the offending URL did, indeed, occur in the email message... but
> in the part that ASSP had discarded which is why I didn't see it in
Well I can close out my own mystery on this one. Failed to realize that ASSP
only stores part of the failed message in the spam folder . So, the offending URL did, indeed, occur in the email message... but
in the part that ASSP had discarded which is why I didn't see it in the
stored message. Li
Kevin wrote:
> Open the message in a text editor and check the source.
Hi Kevin...
I should have said up front, that I did that already. The reported failed
URL onlinebusinessshow.com does not appear anywhere in the message source.
If anybody wants to look at the source let me know and I'll be
Evan wrote:
> I'm getting a URIBL failure
>
> Received-URIBL: fail
> (onlinebusinessshow.com.multi.surbl.org->127.0.0.16; )
>
> where the domain listed in the logfile as the cause of the failure (which is
> indeed on a SURBL list), does NOT appear anywhere in the email itself. Is
> t
I'm getting a URIBL failure
Received-URIBL: fail
(onlinebusinessshow.com.multi.surbl.org->127.0.0.16; )
where the domain listed in the logfile as the cause of the failure (which is
indeed on a SURBL list), does NOT appear anywhere in the email itself. Is that
even possible?
This err
