[Assp-user] WhiteList vs. whitelisted domains/addresses

Hi, can someone clarify whats the difference between "add to WhiteList" and "add to whitelisted domains/addresses, which is offered when clicking on a sender in the ASSP maillog window. Thanks, Thomas -- Check out the v

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist has no precedence

> > Thomas > > Von:"Philippe Schelté" > An:"For Users of ASSP" > Datum: 26.06.2018 17:45 > Betreff:Re: [Assp-user] whitelist has no precedence > > - > > Thomas, > in fact I have ret.com (wi

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist has no precedence

use *@ret.com in blackListedDomains Thomas Von:"Philippe Schelté" An: "For Users of ASSP" Datum: 26.06.2018 17:45 Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] whitelist has no precedence Thomas, in fact I have ret.com (with no wild card) in the blackdomains.txt

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist has no precedence

>what can I do then ? recommended to read: - the complete section for 'DoBlackDomain' Thomas Von:"Philippe Schelté" An: "For Users of ASSP" Datum: 26.06.2018 17:45 Betreff:Re: [Assp-user] whitelist has no precedence Thomas, in fact

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist has no precedence

there is nothing wrong removing the file from the spam folder, if > blockreporting is not used. > > Thomas > > Von:"Philippe Schelté" > An:"Assp User" > Datum:26.06.2018 14:26 > Betreff:[Assp-user] whitelist has no pr

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist has no precedence

r, if blockreporting is not used. Thomas Von:"Philippe Schelté" An: "Assp User" Datum: 26.06.2018 14:26 Betreff:[Assp-user] whitelist has no precedence Hello, I have a false positive tagged [BlackDomain] that I have reported as a non spam. Assp replie

[Assp-user] whitelist has no precedence

Hello, I have a false positive tagged [BlackDomain] that I have reported as a non spam. Assp replied that it has put the email on the whitelist. But the email continue to be blocked as [BlackDomain], I believed that the Whitelisting had a precedence over all the other processings. Another thi

[Assp-user] Whitelist & strict SPF?

Look at the message below: Aug-24-16 12:15:32 m1-33732-13084 [Worker_3] 176.62.160.58 info: found message size announcement: 19.47 kByte Aug-24-16 12:15:33 m1-33732-13084 [Worker_3] 176.62.160.58 to: s...@snip.be Whitelisted sender Domain: bounce.plopsa.email...@gmail.com Aug-24-16 12:15:33

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist & spam

So I have to add ups.com to blockstrictSPFRe? - Original Message - From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] To: For Users of ASSP [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net] Sent: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 18:15:18 +0100 Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist & spam > >They ar

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist & spam

>They are all sent from random *@ups.com addresses using a lot of different IP's. SPF will catch it. Thomas Von:"Andy Knuts" An: "For Users of ASSP" Datum: 18.08.2016 16:42 Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist & spam Yes. I'm using

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist & spam

16:26:19 +0100 Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist & spam > Do you have ups.com in whiteListedDomains? > > The line: > Aug-18-16 12:46:17 m1-17176-01346 [Worker_3] 83.110.218.163 < > rosalyn.backman...@ups.com> to: s...@seniorennet.be Whitelisted sender > Domain: @u

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist & spam

> From: Andy Knuts [mailto:a...@knuts.be] > To: > assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:40:20 > +0100 > Subject: [Assp-user] Whitelist & spam > > > > Today we have a lot of spam getting through. They are all sent from > random > > *@ups.co

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist & spam

mailto:a...@knuts.be] To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:40:20 +0100 Subject: [Assp-user] Whitelist & spam > Today we have a lot of spam getting through. They are all sent from random > *@ups.com addresses using a lot of different IP's. Here's an example: &

[Assp-user] Whitelist & spam

Today we have a lot of spam getting through. They are all sent from random *@ups.com addresses using a lot of different IP's. Here's an example: Aug-18-16 12:46:15 [Worker_3] Connected: session:7EFE8B4366C0 83.110.218.163:56196 > :25 > 127.0.0.1:125 Aug-18-16 12:46:17 m1-17176-01346 [Worker_3]

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist entries disappear

any saving and the cleanup of old records. Thomas Von:Tony den Haan An: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 22.12.2015 14:37 Betreff: [Assp-user] whitelist entries disappear hi, An extremely annoying 'feature': whitelist entries get deleted: MaxWhitelistDays is set

[Assp-user] whitelist entries disappear

hi, An extremely annoying 'feature': whitelist entries get deleted: MaxWhitelistDays is set to high value, UpdateWhitelist is set to 0 and still whitelist entries users set simply disappear. How am i supposed to prevent this? Tony ---

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist

Yes - if 'EmailErrorsModifyWhite' and/or 'EmailErrorsRemoveWhite' is set in V1. Yes - if 'EmailErrorsModifyWhite' in V2. Thomas Von:Phil Cook An: For Users of ASSP Datum: 11.10.2014 16:12 Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist Does the spam

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist

Does the spam and not-spam reports remove or add to the whitelist as in previous versions? Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 2:52 AM To: For Users of ASSP Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist

Sorry - there is V2 code for the privat whitelist operations in V1, which is incompletely implemented. I'll correct this. Thomas Von:Phil Cook An: 'For Users of ASSP' Datum: 10.10.2014 22:18 Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist On my system it's assp-n

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist

On my system it's assp-notwhite. Just tested it and it's not working. Everything looks good. I get a report back but when I check it, still in the list. Running ASSP Version: 1.10.0(14261) > What's the value for : Remove from Whitelist > Address/(EmailWhitelistRemove)/ Listed under Email > In

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist

What's the value for : Remove from Whitelist Address/(EmailWhitelistRemove)/ Listed under Email Interfaces For my installation it's asspnotwhite (no -). On 10/9/2014 6:57 PM, Phil Cook wrote: > Sending an email to assp-notwhite with an email address in the body of the > message, does not remo

[Assp-user] Whitelist

Sending an email to assp-notwhite with an email address in the body of the message, does not remove that address from the list. Anyone else having trouble with this? -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with Even

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist all e-mails for one domain

For Users of ASSP schreibt: >Is it possible to whitelist all e-mails coming to a specific domain ? Put @specificdomain.com into ->spamLovers and ->spamLoverSubjectSelect ed -- This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Win

[Assp-user] Whitelist all e-mails for one domain

Hi, Is it possible to whitelist all e-mails coming to a specific domain ? Regards, Andreas Krüger -- This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist interface not working

For Users of ASSP schreibt: >That appears to have fixed the startup problem. Shortly after logging >into the admin interface assp crashed. The only thing I see in the >maillog is 'Jan-10-12 13:18:47 Terminating ASSP: mainloop exception;' I have no clue what is causing this with V 1.9. (never

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist interface not working

On 1/10/2012 12:44 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > It is the first time I ever saw such a message. > However I changed the code to: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/assp/ASSP%20Installation/AutoUpdate/ASSP1x/assp.pl.gz That appears to have fixed the startup problem. Shortly after logging

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist interface not working

It is the first time I ever saw such a message. However I changed the code to: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/assp/ASSP%20Installation/AutoUpdate/ASSP1x/assp.pl.gz -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and to

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist interface not working

On 1/10/2012 12:09 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > For Users of ASSP schreibt: >> 'Unknown encoding '40' at assp.pl line 2944' >> >> Line 40 = use MIME::Base64; > > The line was 2944 not 40, anyhow what Perl are you running? > Did you run the modul installaton descibed in changelog.txt? Haha, sorr

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist interface not working

For Users of ASSP schreibt: > >'Unknown encoding '40' at assp.pl line 2944' > >Line 40 = use MIME::Base64; The line was 2944 not 40, anyhow what Perl are you running? Did you run the modul installaton descibed in changelog.txt? -

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist interface not working

I upgraded and when I restarted assp I get the following... 'Unknown encoding '40' at assp.pl line 2944' Line 40 = use MIME::Base64; On 1/9/2012 12:34 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > Please upgrade to 1.9.2.5 > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/assp/files/ASSP%20Installation/ASSP_1.9.x.x-Insta

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist interface not working

Please upgrade to 1.9.2.5 http://sourceforge.net/projects/assp/files/ASSP%20Installation/ASSP_1.9.x.x-Install/ -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resou

[Assp-user] Whitelist interface not working

Hello, I'm running assp in Ubuntu Server 11.10 (the apt package 1.5.1.4(1.0.06) ). When I use the admin interface and try and enter manual whitelist entries nothing happens. I get no feedback at all. Any suggestions? Thanks, El

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist and np domains still getting moved to spam

>Please show the log of an example (and the mailheaders, if possible). Hey Fritz, The logs have been purged, but it seems to happen regularly with this user and domain, so I am sure by next Sunday I will have something to submit. Thanks! jlc --

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist and np domains still getting moved to spam

For Users of ASSP writes: >I have one email address and one domain in noProcessingFrom and >noProcessingDomains which still have mail getting caught in the spam >and several of these get removed every rebuild. > >What setting am I missing that is still processing these emails? Please show the lo

[Assp-user] Whitelist and np domains still getting moved to spam

I have one email address and one domain in noProcessingFrom and noProcessingDomains which still have mail getting caught in the spam and several of these get removed every rebuild. What setting am I missing that is still processing these emails? Thanks, jlc --

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist based on subject

For Users of ASSP schreibt: >Will the regular expression below do the trick? > >^.*\b(banana|apple)\b.*$ whiteRe does not search in subject only. So actually subject: (banana|apple)\b will do. But there is grouping involved which makes it slow. Better would be: subject\:\s(?:banana|apple)\b

[Assp-user] Whitelist based on subject

I was looking for a way to whitelist emails with a specific subject line of text like for example (banana or apple.) I think I need to use "Regular Expression to Identify Non-Spam* (whiteRe)" to get this done. Will the regular expression below do the trick? ^.*\b(banana|apple)\b.*$ Thank yo

[Assp-user] Whitelist

What would cause my whitelist to go from 3.6 meg in size to 82kb? Days to keep on the list is set to . -- Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment a

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist DB vs bombsubjectre.

I know what you meant. I think we just miscommunicated. On Sep 13, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > For Users of ASSP > Thanks for the help fritz. I got them set. Told them to just use >> Trend for that particular subject. They never want to turn off >> obeying the whitelist for

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist DB vs bombsubjectre.

our test emails kept coming through, so we went with the Trend solution instead. Please don't think ill of me:) Joyce -Original Message- From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de] Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 12:30 PM To: For Users of ASSP Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist DB vs bombsubjectre.

For Users of ASSP Thanks for the help fritz. I got them set. Told them to just use >Trend for that particular subject. They never want to turn off >obeying the whitelist for 99.999% of checks per management policy so >that fix wasn't really an option for them. *sigh* I do not understand. I e

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist DB vs bombsubjectre.

Thanks for the help fritz. I got them set. Told them to just use Trend for that particular subject. They never want to turn off obeying the whitelist for 99.999% of checks per management policy so that fix wasn't really an option for them. *sigh* On Sep 13, 2010, at 10:20 AM, Fritz Borgsted

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist DB vs bombsubjectre.

For Users of ASSP schreibt: >We have been asked by our security officer to block the phrase "here >you >have" from the subject in emails coming in from the outside. We put >\Ahere you have\Z in the subjectre.txt file to try to do that (and >restarted ASSP). When we tested it, it came through be

[Assp-user] Whitelist DB vs bombsubjectre.

Hi All, We have been asked by our security officer to block the phrase "here you have" from the subject in emails coming in from the outside. We put \Ahere you have\Z in the subjectre.txt file to try to do that (and restarted ASSP). When we tested it, it came through because the sender's addr

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist Pollution

Its still a bad feature. Spam that makes it through is auto-whitelisted. Fritz' response only explains a bad feature. NOT your mistake. assplove wrote: > > My mistake. > > > On Aug 10, 2010, at 2:04 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > >> For Users of ASSP schreibt: >>> There is a newish feature

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist Pollution

My mistake. On Aug 10, 2010, at 2:04 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > For Users of ASSP schreibt: >> There is a newish feature that by default *sigh* adds entries to the >> whitelist if they have been in the OK cache for X amount of time. >> Look under whitelisting I believe. > > > Enable OKAd

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist Pollution

For Users of ASSP schreibt: >There is a newish feature that by default *sigh* adds entries to the >whitelist if they have been in the OK cache for X amount of time. >Look under whitelisting I believe. Enable OKAddress Cache (DoOKCaching) OKAddress: If a message is marked 'Message OK' the se

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist Pollution

Yes, tricky spammers must frequent this forum. assplove wrote: > > There is a newish feature that by default *sigh* adds entries to the > whitelist if they have been in the OK cache for X amount of time. Look > under whitelisting I believe. > > > On Aug 9, 2010, at 4:40 PM, bytehd wrote: >

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist Pollution

There is a newish feature that by default *sigh* adds entries to the whitelist if they have been in the OK cache for X amount of time. Look under whitelisting I believe. On Aug 9, 2010, at 4:40 PM, bytehd wrote: > > i found lots of email addresses that spam senders are using. > The logs all

[Assp-user] Whitelist Pollution

i found lots of email addresses that spam senders are using. The logs all show "OKCache whitelist addition: joeu...@domain.com" No ONE in the company added these. Has my linux box been hacked? I turned off the email interface temporarily. I noticed that in 1.7.X there is a setting to auto-whitel

[Assp-user] Whitelist not obeyed narrowed down.

In one instance, it seems assp is only looking at the envelope sender and not the ³from² when checking against the whitelist. An email with the following headers was tagged by the bayesian filter. The from address was whitelisted, the envelope sender was not. Is this how it is supposed to work?

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist and Greylisting

Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt: > >> Hmm, was that an intentional change in functionality? Older versions >> didn't work that way as far as I can tell. >> > > No, it was not. It was a bug. Already patched and confirmed corrected > by Joseph. > As always, 2 steps ah

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist and Greylisting

[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt: >Hmm, was that an intentional change in functionality? Older versions >didn't work that way as far as I can tell. No, it was not. It was a bug. Already patched and confirmed corrected by Joseph. ---

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist and Greylisting

Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Is it shown in log as whitelisted? >> > > What finally worked for the ca.example.com sender was modifying the > whitelistedDomains > file with *example.com from example.com. > > I assumed that example.com matched everything possible forward, but I guess > not. Now

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist and Greylisting

>Is it shown in log as whitelisted? What finally worked for the ca.example.com sender was modifying the whitelistedDomains file with *example.com from example.com. I assumed that example.com matched everything possible forward, but I guess not. Now I guess example.com matches all possibilities

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist and Greylisting

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: >I have a text file with white listed domains, one of them is >"example.com" written on its own line without quotes. >DelayWL is unchecked, yet I can see from the logs mail is getting >delayed from a subdomain, ca.example.com.

[Assp-user] Whitelist and Greylisting

Running 1.4.3.1, I have a text file with white listed domains, one of them is "example.com" written on its own line without quotes. DelayWL is unchecked, yet I can see from the logs mail is getting delayed from a subdomain, ca.example.com. Am I missing something somewhere else maybe? Thanks! jl

Re: [Assp-user] WhiteList Adition

>Is there an easy way to >remove all of them for all local domains? grep ? - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration f

Re: [Assp-user] WhiteList Adition

Hi Fritz It works like it should, there is no Whitelist addition for local users, we tested it some times now. Sorry for that. But fact is, that we have many local users on the whitelist and have no idea how they comes in? Any idea how this can happen? Is there an easy way to remove all of them

Re: [Assp-user] WhiteList Adition

>There is a problem with Whitelist addition in 1.3.3.2(29) > >When sending local user email to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] over the >e-mail >interface, the local address gets white listed. > >This will be a problem, when the user becomes spam because it slips >throu. > >has anybody else seen this? Did

[Assp-user] WhiteList Adition

There is a problem with Whitelist addition in 1.3.3.2(29) When sending local user email to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] over the e-mail interface, the local address gets white listed. This will be a problem, when the user becomes spam because it slips throu. has anybody else seen this? Thanks Milan

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist deletion

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: >9th or 19th? > >I received this on the 11th, so was just wondering what date you were >meaning. I was repeating my own mail from July 5th. The planned day was 9th but I send Ged today another fix. Best would be to take the

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist deletion

> My next hospital stay is shifted to next monday, so 1.3.2 will be > released on July 9th. 9th or 19th? I received this on the 11th, so was just wondering what date you were meaning. Thanks, Doug Traylor PS. How ya doin Fritz? Getting the pneumonia out of your system? Me, I threw my back o

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist deletion

That has fixed the issue. Thanks very much. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Borgstedt Sent: 11 July 2007 11:30 To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] whitelist deletion Questions

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist deletion

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: >Hi Fritz, > >Where can we download the beta? Funny that you missed my old posting and several other about that. My next hospital stay is shifted to next monday, so 1.3.2 will be released on July 9th. I am not able to debug

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist deletion

Hi Fritz, Where can we download the beta? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Borgstedt Sent: 11 July 2007 11:11 To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] whitelist deletion Questions

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist deletion

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: >I have been having an issue with whitelisting through the email >interface. I receive a reply from the server but the mail address to >be >whitelisted is not present in the reply, and the server whitelist is >not >updated...

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist deletion

Markus Sent: 11 July 2007 08:56 To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Assp-user] whitelist deletion Hello, I am using assp 1.3.1() and the whitelist addition/deletion with the email interface doesn't work. Does anyone has the same experience ? M

[Assp-user] whitelist deletion

Hello, I am using assp 1.3.1() and the whitelist addition/deletion with the email interface doesn't work. Does anyone has the same experience ? Markus - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C -

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist reload

You can use mysql for sharing the whitelist,redlist and delaydb. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Cli

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist reload

Fritz Borgstedt schrieb: > The whitelist is reloaded when the file is changed this doesn't seems to be the case IMHO: when I add an entry, its correctly written to file (I opened the file directly and checked). Now if I use another installation to add another entry (which is once again correct

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist reload

The whitelist is reloaded when the file is changed (Cache reset (./whitelist)). I do not see any other reason to reload the whitelist. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version

[Assp-user] whitelist-file: coexistance of different installations (i.e. processes)

Hi I want to have several installations running on the same machine using the same whitelist file. I managed this using symlinks. Now how is assp updating the whitelist: is it rereading the existing file before writing a new one? So if one installation added [EMAIL PROTECTED], and this has bee

[Assp-user] whitelist reload

Hi all Is it possible to have the whitelist being reloaded more frequently? By the way: how often is it done? I just found an option to have it written more frequently (updateWhitelist) but it doesn't seem to concern the reloading time. Thanks a lot Gregor. --

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist entries being removed???

:32 AM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist entries being removed??? Dickson, Paul wrote: > In reverse order, you can see by this log that [EMAIL PROTECTED] was > whitelisted back in apr. A message from her was tagged as sp

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist entries being removed???

Dickson, Paul wrote: > In reverse order, you can see by this log that [EMAIL PROTECTED] was > whitelisted back in apr. A message from her was tagged as spam and > when re-submitted to whitelist, was whitelisted again, thus it was > some how removed from whitelist. Usually, when I see a whitelist

[Assp-user] Whitelist entries being removed???

In reverse order, you can see by this log that [EMAIL PROTECTED] was whitelisted back in apr. A message from her was tagged as spam and when re-submitted to whitelist, was whitelisted again, thus it was some how removed from whitelist. Usually, when I see a whitelist submission, it only says add

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist symlink is deleted when assp is updating whitelist

Fritz Borgstedt wrote: >> If the whitelist is modified, ASSP seems to delete the >> whitelist file (which is in fact a symlink) and creates a new one >> with >> the modified data in it. > > You are sure this is done by ASSP? > > rebuildspamdb.pl is "repairing" the whitelist in every run. It's

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist symlink is deleted when assp is updatingwhitelist

> Symlink the folder the whitelist is in and not the whitelist itself. > Pretty smart - I'll do it like this, switching to mysql as soon as I have time to set it up. Big thx to all who helped! Gregor. - This SF.net ema

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist symlink is deleted when assp is updating whitelist

>If the whitelist is modified, ASSP seems to delete the >whitelist file (which is in fact a symlink) and creates a new one >with >the modified data in it. You are sure this is done by ASSP? rebuildspamdb.pl is "repairing" the whitelist in every run. fritz --

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist symlink is deleted when assp is updatingwhitelist

Gregor Reich wrote: >> Assp doesn't really like symlinks. The database files are polled for >> changes and reread if a change (in time stamp) is detected. Symlinks >> don't change their time stamp even if the file it's pointing to does. >> > I tried to overcome this problem by using hardlinks -

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist symlink is deleted when assp is updatingwhitelist

Gregor Reich wrote: >> Assp doesn't really like symlinks. The database files are polled for >> changes and reread if a change (in time stamp) is detected. Symlinks >> don't change their time stamp even if the file it's pointing to does. >> >> > I tried to overcome this problem by using hard

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist symlink is deleted when assp is updatingwhitelist

> > Assp doesn't really like symlinks. The database files are polled for > changes and reread if a change (in time stamp) is detected. Symlinks > don't change their time stamp even if the file it's pointing to does. > I tried to overcome this problem by using hardlinks - still the same. Why doe

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist symlink is deleted when assp is updatingwhitelist

> machine (running linux and ASSP 1.2.6), I use Symlinks in the > base directory of each installation that point to the Assp doesn't really like symlinks. The database files are polled for changes and reread if a change (in time stamp) is detected. Symlinks don't change their time stamp even if

[Assp-user] whitelist symlink is deleted when assp is updating whitelist

Hi everyone Because I'm sharing spamdb, delaydb, spam/notspam folders and the whitelist among different installations one the same machine (running linux and ASSP 1.2.6), I use Symlinks in the base directory of each installation that point to the corresponding files/directories in a "shared" d

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist entry, is this a problem fritz?

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: >I confirmed this bug in 1.3.0. If I forward a mail w/ [ >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] to whitelist, I see the whitelist >addition in the log for that address. If I do the full name w/ the >.org on the

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist entry, is this a problem fritz?

> Everything else worked as designed. > good for me too in maillog : email hamreport Apr-18-07 15:28:42 Email whitelist addition: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lastest version 1.3.1 - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Dow

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist entry, is this a problem fritz?

I confirmed this bug in 1.3.0. If I forward a mail w/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] to whitelist, I see the whitelist addition in the log for that address. If I do the full name w/ the .org on the end, the log just says 'ham report', but no whitelist addition. Neither exist in the whitelist between tries.

[Assp-user] Whitelist entry, is this a problem fritz?

The .org is cut off. Should be .pti.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click

[Assp-user] whitelist entry title=3d

Hello, I've noticed that I have approximately 30 entries in the whitelist where "title=3d" prepends the actual email address whitelisted. Has anyone else ever seen this? It just seems kind of weird. King regards, Elvar -

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist field...

: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 11:16 AM Subject: [Assp-user] Whitelist field... > Hi, > > is there another possibility to add domains and addresses to the whitelist > instead of the field in the webinterface, textfile or sql db? > If we set up assp for about 8000 user, it's nearl

[Assp-user] Whitelist field...

Hi, is there another possibility to add domains and addresses to the whitelist instead of the field in the webinterface, textfile or sql db? If we set up assp for about 8000 user, it's nearly impossible to administer a whitelist with this small field. Thanks! Nicole ---

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist empty

you do not have your outgoing mail setup correctly to route through ASSP. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 12:02 PM To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Assp-user] Whitelist empty Hi, after 5 da

[Assp-user] Whitelist empty

Hi, after 5 days running assp my whitelist it continues empty. (I dont received none spam, very, very good work! clap clap clap!) ASSP Proxy Uptime: 4.950 days My maillog.txt shows: Dec-22-06 02:14:53 199.175.137.231 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> renewing whitelisted tuplet: (199.175.137.0,lists.horde

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist question

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: >2. > >James. No, there are options to force otherwise. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist question

Look into the code. You are joking, right? fritz - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through bri

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist question

On 01/12/2006, at 11:26 PM, Graziano wrote: > Thank you , > > another question please , to understand well how works assp . If assp > receive a whitelist email > > 1) assp executes bayes , HELO , SPF and RBL checks and then bypass > them > because whitelisted > > OR > > 2) assp bypass all filt

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist question

Thank you , another question please , to understand well how works assp . If assp receive a whitelist email 1) assp executes bayes , HELO , SPF and RBL checks and then bypass them because whitelisted OR 2) assp bypass all filters and process the email immediately . I am asking this because

Re: [Assp-user] whitelist question

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: >Hello > >The email on whitelist bypass also HELO , SPF and RBL checks ? >Or the email on whitelist works(bypass) only with Bayesian filter ?. > > >Thank you >Graziano Graziano, it would be nice if you read the web GUI. You w

[Assp-user] whitelist question

Hello The email on whitelist bypass also HELO , SPF and RBL checks ? Or the email on whitelist works(bypass) only with Bayesian filter ?. Thank you Graziano - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceF

  1   2   >