I have checked off every test mode button (and applied changes), but none of
my incoming email has anything prepended to the subject line. Am I
misunderstanding the purpose of test mode? What should this do?
Thanks,
MD
-
I have a new ASSP installation, mostly at defaults. After 1/2 day of
running, my stats show (see below) 17.6% non-local mail blocked. However,
the \spam folder is empty. Where are these blocked messages going? I want
to confirm they are truly spam!
(I'm running in test mode - all boxes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Marcus
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 11:22 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] In test mode but no subject changes?
Michelle Dupuis wrote:
I have
After a day of testing, I have a reasonable sample of message in the
\notspam and \error\spam directories. I ran the rebuildspamdb.pl script (I
think it was succesfull), but I see my directories still contain the .eml
and .rpt files.
Are these directories going to grow indefinately? Do I have
Our company's email arrives at our SMTP server from a single host (our ISP's
backup mail server). Since they don't offer RTBL filtering, I would like to
try to do the same. For this reason, all inbound SMTP connections come from
1 IP addresses.
Is there a way to apply the RBL to IP addresses
I have a couple of log entries that I need help with. The first is:
66.231.184.40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regex:Red 'Unsubscribe'
What does the Regex:Red 'Unsubscribe' mean? Which regex is matching this
message? The next is:
My assp setup (running in test mode) received a message which is confusing
mesee below. It was FROM revenuemanagement.com, showing that a message
with the subject [SPAM] deign out-of-bounds was rejected and bounced back
to me.
My ASSP is setup to prefix [SPAM] on the subject line of spam
lists so I haven't had reason to look into that
yet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:assp-user-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michelle Dupuis
Sent: Monday, 12 February 2007 11:58 AM
To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy'
Subject: [Assp
This isn't purely an ASSP question...but hopefully someone can help. I
grabbed the Bomb regex samples from the ASSP web site, to improve my
filtering. One group of regex's trap for bank fraud spam, as follows:
(bank|credit|ebay|pal|security|union|YOUR_ORG) (antivirus|support|team)#
phishing
I would like to throw out a feature request - which sounds (based on my
little knowledge) like and easy fix/implementation.
Users like me have all inbound mail route through an ISP. This adds one
received line to the top of the header file.
The problem is, that this line makes it impossible to
?
MD
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 12:42 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Feature request: Strip first received line of
header
Michelle Dupuis
: [Assp-user] 1.2.7(final) ASSP Perl process hanging w/ 100%
CPUfor about 1-
Michelle Dupuis wrote:
Ok - my lack of knowledge here
My ISP adds one received line to the header. Perhaps and option for
home many received's to strip off the top?
As for ASSP, could it be an option to use
I've been working with ASSP, and I've wondered if a blacklist feature
would be usefull.
Whereas the whitelist confirms VALID senders that one wishes to accept,
would it be usefull to have a blacklist for VALID senders you wish to
refuse? (but later may wish to re-enable)
This is based on my
, February 15, 2007 4:43 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Do we need a blacklist feature?
Michelle Dupuis wrote:
I've been working with ASSP, and I've wondered if a blacklist
feature would be usefull.
Whereas the whitelist confirms VALID
I've gotten a couple of emails with the prefix : in the subject.
What does this mean? Is it being added by ASSP?
Thanks,
MD
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel
and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy'
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Prefix : in subject
It's a common spam subject line from Russian spam mail.
-Original Message-
Michelle Dupuis wrote:
I've gotten a couple of emails with the prefix : in the subject.
What
: in subject
You've definitely not got anything in the Bayesian Test mode subject suffix?
In ASSP's logs, does the subject for the mail have the question marks?
James.
On 20/02/2007, at 9:30 AM, Michelle Dupuis wrote:
These are emails from a client - so they are not spam. My header
shows (I X'd out
for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Prefix : in subject
Michelle Dupuis wrote:
My log shows:
Feb-19-07 15:40:26 66.231.184.40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
local or
whitelisted - (attachments unchecked) _Locking_in_Business_Strategy_
- c:\assp
I'm trying to compile pwlib, and have followed instructions to the letter.
Can anyone help me get past the error below?
(I did have the latest openh323 and pwlib on my system before, but did a
make clean, removed them, and then downloaded the mimas patch versions)
I looks like contain.cxx
What about the config file? Are missing entries automatically created with
default values (upon installation)?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 5:14 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of
We struggled on a recent installation of ASSP - which lead to a couple of
questions. Hopefully some can shed some light on:
1. Does one need a smarthost for outbound mail? (Or can ASSP handle
sending direct to destination MTA)
2. If ASSP listens on only 1 port , how can it distinguish
We recently setup a client using exchange as follows
Internet--ASSP--Exchange
And Exchange--ASSP--Internet
We put ASSP in the outbound path to allow for the mail interface to work.
For some reason, we could not get outbound to work unless we specified a
smarthost in ASSP. Then all worked
We've been running ASSP on Windows with great success - actually on the same
box as our Exchange 2007. We'd like to get away from Symantec, and hope to
experiment with ClamAV on this same windows box.
We see that ASSP can integrate with ClamAV, and we found a www.clamwin.com
site offering
Can NOD32 be integrated with ASSP (on a Windows machine)?
MD
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Marcus
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:16 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user]
My mail server does not support a catch all account, so I'm hoping that ASSP
can help out. My mail server is exchange 2007, and cannot support a catch
all without a separate edge server (we have a single server).
I'm running ASSP 1.2.6 successfully; can I use it to rewrite
invalid/non-existent
I'm not using the Validate Local Addresses feature - because I didn't want
to block valid messages to users with mistyped addresses. (We have two
employees with French names, and it's amazing how often senders get it
wrong).
Unfortunately, upgrading to Exchange 2007 caused us to lose the
That KB article is for Exchange 2003 only. Exchange 2007 works very
differently.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mirko Scholz
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 3:17 PM
To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy'
We have encountered an ASSP install in which all mail is being flagged as
spam unless it's on the whitelist. To find out why, we took an spam message
and run it through the ASSP analyzer.
1. We found the it match many words to bad words, however, the good
words column was empty! Why is it not
I'm running ASSP 1.2.6 and am thinking about upgrading. Can I find a list
of features somewhere to help me decide whether or not to upgrade?
As well, is upgrading a complex process? (Or is it a simple install and all
settings move over)
MD
Because of our MTA's limitations (Exchange 2007 all-in-one setup), I am
unable to implement a catchall account in Exchange. Does ASSP offer the
ability to rewrite the TO address of an email that the MTA refuses (or ASSP
determines does not exist), sending it instead to a catchall account? (I'm
I'm still getting emails containing links to sites in russia. I have this
regex in my BombRe file:
http\:\/\/[A-Za-z\.]+?\.(?:ru|ly|nl|ec|cc|vc|ua|in|am)[\s\/\n\r\\]
Which according to my (web based) regex testers SHOULD catch the email message
below. So, I put it into the mail tester in ASSP
I upgraded from 1.2.x to version 2 of ASSP. And WOW are there a lot more
settings (not wow in a good way). I'm trying to tune ASSP to behave as well as
my old ver 1.x but I'm missing info. In particular, many messages have hardle
any x-assp-* in the header (see example below). Why? Some
I'm setting up ASSP in an environment with an SMTP gateway at the network edge.
So, all mail must flow through that SMTP gateway (relay) before hitting ASSP.
This messes up a lot of ASSP features like SPF, since everything is arriving at
ASSP from an approved SMTP host, but prior hosts may
Just another opinion - but I too have been stuck on ASSP problems, posted
questions, and never got answers. I've learned to live with the problems and
just have to weigh the benefits of a broken ASSP installation vs no ASSp
installation.
I understand the OP's concerns, and understand why he
34 matches
Mail list logo
