ksh93 uses O_CLOEXEC to avoid passing all its file descriptors to a
child process. That is IMO a good thing (clean!).
However, is there a way to pass a file descriptor to a child process?
Tina
--
Tina Harriott - Women in Mathematics
Contact: tina.harriott.mathemat...@gmail.com
Dan, what does super() do?
Olga
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Dan Douglas orm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:40:01 PM David Korn wrote:
cc: ast-users@lists.research.att.com orm...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Re: [ast-users] _ doesn't refer to the correct object.
Irek, I agree. The idea of nested name spaces, which work like java
and are organised like DNS, would help with building a set of standard
libraries for ksh93, which do not interfere with libraries from other
projects.
Olga
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Irek Szczesniak iszczesn...@gmail.com
In version Version AIJM 93v- 2013-07-24 (SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP2)
var=value command eval command leaves the current environment unaffected,
however var=value eval command simply sets var in current context but does
not propagate it to command. (same as in Version AJM 93u+
Version AJM 93u+ 2012-08-01 :
cp003421 ksh -c 'echo \nTest\n'
Test
Version AIJM 93v- 2013-07-24 :
cp003421 ksh93v -c 'echo \nTest\n'
\nTest\n
cp003421 cat /etc/SuSE-release
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 11 (x86_64)
VERSION = 11
PATCHLEVEL = 2
Best Regards
Axel Philipp
--
MTU Aero Engines
Axel, the work around is to use the POSIX printf utility/builtin, or
it's print sibling (has more options, see print --man). printf(1) has
standard behaviour on all platforms, and is tested on regular basis
against the test suites of the standards.
Olga
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:23 AM, ольга
On Monday, July 29, 2013 09:40:45 AM ольга крыжановская wrote:
Dan, what does super() do?
To oversimplifiy, it returns a reference to the superclass (a bit more
complicated since python has multiple inheritence). In ksh we have a reference
to the current object using _, but can't for example
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Dan Douglas orm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:40:01 PM David Korn wrote:
cc: ast-users@lists.research.att.com orm...@gmail.com
[snip]
# Static method
typeset -fS totalpop
function totalpop
Thanks, Olga.
ksh93v -c 'echo -e \nTest\n' and ksh93v -c echo $'\nTest\n' also work, but
we don't want to change all scripts.
In this context I would like to understand, why ksh complains about unbalanced
apostrophes in the following assignment:
cp003421 aux='ab\'c d\'ef'
cp003421 aux=ab\c
Currently there is no bug tracking software being used. You can submit
bugs to the ast-developers list or even here for that matter.
Regards
Danny
On 29 July 2013 16:34, Tina Harriott tina.harriott.mathemat...@gmail.comwrote:
On 25 July 2013 19:03, Tina Harriott
cc: iszczesn...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Re: [ast-users] Nested namespaces for function/type libraries
(e.g. com.att.research...) ... / was: Re: ksh -c 'namespace a.c.b { integer
i=5 ; } ; ' = a.c.b: is not an identifier?
Interesting.
namespace --man doesn't work. Is this because
cc: tina.harriott.mathemat...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ast-users] Passing a file descriptor to a child process?
ksh93 uses O_CLOEXEC to avoid passing all its file descriptors to a
child process. That is IMO a good thing (clean!).
However, is there a way to pass a file descriptor to
On 29 July 2013 03:17, Wendy Lin wendlin1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 July 2013 06:17, Roland Mainz roland.ma...@nrubsig.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Wendy Lin wendlin1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 July 2013 04:35, David Korn d...@research.att.com wrote:
cc: wendlin1...@gmail.com
From: tina.harriott.mathemat...@gmail.com
On 29 July 2013 14:40, David Korn d...@research.att.com wrote:
cc: tina.harriott.mathemat...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ast-users] Passing a file descriptor to a child process?
ksh93 uses O_CLOEXEC to avoid passing all its file
(Minor ?!) nit: ksh93 doesn't support static functions in typeset -T
... AFAIK you want namespaces in this case...
Bye,
Roland
What does a static function mean? Does it mean that each instance
cannot redefine it?
Does it mean that _.foo refers to the default value of foo
On 29 July 2013 22:43, Tina Harriott tina.harriott.mathemat...@gmail.comwrote:
On 29 July 2013 03:17, Wendy Lin wendlin1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 July 2013 06:17, Roland Mainz roland.ma...@nrubsig.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Wendy Lin wendlin1...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12
On 29 July 2013 14:43, Tina Harriott
tina.harriott.mathemat...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 July 2013 03:17, Wendy Lin wendlin1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 July 2013 06:17, Roland Mainz roland.ma...@nrubsig.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Wendy Lin wendlin1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 July
On 30 July 2013 05:11, Danny Weldon danny.wel...@gmail.com wrote:
But for stuff that is standard/builtin/core for ksh93, rather than:
com.att.research.hello
I think this would be much nicer:
std.hello
Sure, but first someone has to write something and put it into a place
which is NOT
18 matches
Mail list logo
