On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:15:58PM +0100, Chris Bagnall wrote:
To everyone whose business has been hurt or impaired by the practices of the
big 5 operators in the UK, perhaps you could all sign a petition by
following the
link below, or attached email:
OFCOM is now in consultation to
Chris,
I struggle to criticise anything that makes people think twice before
phoning my mobile when I have a perfectly good SIP phone on my desk
There are millions of people who work depend on their mobile phone as the
primary means of contact without the luxury of having a desk, surely they
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:40:41PM +0100, Abdul Hakeem wrote:
[snip]
There's an EU directives in place capping data and roaming charges.
It's a bit of saying if I put in more secure locks on my door that would
only give the burglar incentive to try another trick !.
I believe there's a cap in
Steve,
b) The big 5 (and now 6 if you include Virgin) are being firced to open up
the central porting database etc to new-entrants. UK01 (Mundio Mobile) are
such a player and have interconnects (maybe via a 3rd party) roaming with
T-Mobile and porting.
c) SS7 lookups are always free and comes
There are millions of people who work depend on their mobile phone as the
primary means of contact without the luxury of having a desk, surely they
have a voice too.
Yes, that was one of the points I was making. If the MNOs are forced to
decrease termination charges, then they'll make up
Sorry about the top-post. Only just discovered that it annoys people. Shame you
cant change Outlook to be more mailing list friendly.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-biz
I think the USA way of doing things makes life easier for telecoms companies.
Charge the caller the same rate for landline and mobile calls. And charge the
mobile user for receiving calls.
Then the user makes use of inclusive plans to make it more affordable.
-Original Message-
From:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 03:19:09PM +0100, Abdul Hakeem wrote:
b) The big 5 (and now 6 if you include Virgin) are being firced to open up
the central porting database etc to new-entrants. UK01 (Mundio Mobile) are
such a player and have interconnects (maybe via a 3rd party) roaming with
Dan Journo wrote:
Sorry about the top-post. Only just discovered that it annoys people. Shame
you cant change Outlook to be more mailing list friendly.
Don't worry, some others are annoyed by bottom posting. You can't keep
everyone happy...
:) :)
Best regards,
Vlasis Hatzistavrou.
--
Hey, Folks:
Am looking for DID's in Panama city and also ports for unlimited local
service. Please send me prices and rates.
Luis B. Mata
http://www.ocntechnologies.com
954-889-8626
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation
I think the USA way of doing things makes life easier for telecoms companies.
Charge the caller the same rate for landline and mobile calls. And charge the
mobile user for receiving calls.
So the mobile owner has to pay to receive calls from unscrupulous telemarketers
they never wanted to
So the mobile owner has to pay to receive calls from unscrupulous
telemarketers they never wanted to hear from in the first place?
I've never felt the US approach of charging the caller to *receive* calls
seemed very fair to me.
I didn't say it was fair to the consumer. I said its easier
Hi,
If I was going to post this as an iPhone-only SIP client, I'd expect
loud booing and hissing, but Media5 mobile SIP client is available for
the Symbian S60 platform, too, or will be shortly. Interested? To join
us and hear about Media5 form Pascal Dore, see http://vuc.me
Speaking of mobile,
13 matches
Mail list logo
