On Nov 14, 2007 9:21 PM, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The call is going out on a PRI in this case.
>
>The question I asked was rather theoretical; what we are trying to do
> concretely is use the automatic dial-out functionality
> (/var/spool/asterisk/outgoing) to play a messa
Um...
http://store.digium.com/productview.php?category_id=5&product_code=8G729CODEC&main_category_id=5
On Nov 15, 2007 10:59 AM, Lokesh Agrawal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to purchase commercial license of G.729 Codec through Digium. Can
> anyone help me for the same and tell
Hi,
Looking at this and the commit for it, and having disabled it to fix an
issue with a system that we have, I want to ask - are you sure people
don't want single-channel unanswered events? What if the call started
but got hung-up before the dialplan was able go find the destination and
do Dial()
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 08:35 -0700, Corey Edwards wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 15:23 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Olle E Johansson wrote:
> > >
> > > 15 nov 2007 kl. 13.22 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> >
> > > > 1. "concise" tend to better fit in a 80-column
15 nov 2007 kl. 15.51 skrev Russell Bryant:
> Johansson Olle E wrote:
>> I propose that we deprecate the existing "concise" commands in trunk,
>> don't accept new ones and refer
>> users and developers to our lovely AMI solution.
>
> I agree with you here, as well.
Seems like we've reached cons
Johansson Olle E wrote:
> I propose that we deprecate the existing "concise" commands in trunk,
> don't accept new ones and refer
> users and developers to our lovely AMI solution.
I agree with you here, as well.
--
Russell Bryant
Senior Software Engineer
Open Source Team Lead
Digium, Inc.
__
Olle E Johansson wrote:
> 15 nov 2007 kl. 13.22 skrev Tzafrir Cohen:
>
>
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 12:43:40PM +0100, Johansson Olle E wrote:
>>
>>> While browsing the bug tracker today, I found a patch for adding more
>>> "concise" commands to the SIP channel.
>>>
>>> My personal opinion i
Hi All,
I want to purchase commercial license of G.729 Codec through Digium. Can
anyone help me for the same and tell me the price of it.
Thanx in advance.
--
Regards
Lokesh Agrawal
---
- Original Message -
From: Tony Plack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Ast Dev List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 15 Nov 2007
10:48:47 -0400
Subject: [asterisk-dev] Audiohooks-1.4
> I am having the same chanspy crash as others are having reported in bugs.
>
> I am attempting to run a
is there any work going on for implementing struct ast_channel with astobj2?
I am running in a problem with the video extensions that i think
already came out in some other channel driver, and would be completely
solved implementing ast_channel using refcounted structures.
In this specific case,
I am having the same chanspy crash as others are having reported in bugs.
I am attempting to run a MixMonitor against a SIP to SIP channel and getting a
Seg Fault 11 in channel.c:3587 because app_mixmonitor.c:169 is sending over a
chan pointer to address 0.
Since this is off the main branches,
On Thursday 15 November 2007 03:56:26 Rizwan Hisham wrote:
> As you can see in the code which i mentioned in my last email that for
> decrementing the call-limit value they are actually incrementing it, and
> some how it is called reverse decrementing. I need to know What is the
> reason for doing
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Olle E Johansson wrote:
>
> 15 nov 2007 kl. 13.22 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > 1. "concise" tend to better fit in a 80-column terminal (such as the
> > Linux console).
> That won't be the case with other listings - we have much more
> information
> than wha
Tzafrir Cohen ha scritto:
> 2. asterisk -rx "just works" if you're a local root. manager requires
> extra setup.
I've replaced rasterisk with a manager script that return just the
output. Instead with the CLI it return also other bogus messages that
are not the direct output of the command i exe
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 12:43:40PM +0100, Johansson Olle E wrote:
> While browsing the bug tracker today, I found a patch for adding more
> "concise" commands to the SIP channel.
>
> My personal opinion is that I don't like adapting the CLI for machine
> parsing. If we're about to do that, we
While browsing the bug tracker today, I found a patch for adding more
"concise" commands to the SIP channel.
My personal opinion is that I don't like adapting the CLI for machine
parsing. If we're about to do that, we might
as well convert all CLI listings in one big janitor project. But we
16 matches
Mail list logo
