---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3982/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 6:08 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3916/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 8:09 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3996/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 9:42 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3996/#review13310
---
Ship it!
There are now several places in the code where the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3996/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 11:32 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3966/#review13311
---
Ship it!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3990/#review13312
---
/branches/12/include/asterisk/dial.h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3994/#review13314
---
The relationship between the native, local, and remote types
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3971/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 1:15 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
I think to have found an issue, but before reporting on issue.asterisk.org,
I'd like to get an advice here...
I am using realtime ODBC voicemail and all works great except I cannot set
the fromuser settings. It is ignored and the default one is used.
The problem seems laying in the definition of
On Sept. 16, 2014, 12:32 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
The place that needs the most improvement is Multi-party - Mixing:
- MeetMe is _not_ more performant (ever). The description also doesn't
tell a user what MeetMe actually is: a conference bridge for multiple
channels.
-
On Sept. 16, 2014, 12:37 p.m., Scott Griepentrog wrote:
The relationship between the native, local, and remote types is not clear.
This could cause confusion in the reader trying to understand the types.
Although there is a hierarchy in the underlying document format, this is
not
And there was much rejoicing
But seriously, we all know that a lot of people have wanted to move to Git
for some time. For the record, everyone at Digium has wanted to move the
project to Git for some time. I swore to myself that we wouldn't do another
Standard release on Subversion - after we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3999/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers, Matt Jordan and rmudgett.
Bugs:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
And there was much rejoicing
To summarize:
* A comparison of management platforms has been done. Barring a giant
catastrophe or some insane limitation, we're going to go simple here and
stick with gitolite. Reasoning
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
And there was much rejoicing
\o/
But seriously, we all know that a lot of people have wanted to move to Git
for some time. For the record, everyone at Digium has wanted to move the
project to Git for some time. I
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Russell Bryant russ...@russellbryant.net
wrote:
From a high level, all patches go to a code review system. *Every* patch
must be peer reviewed (usually by 2 people, but that's a policy decision).
*Every* patch must also pass tests. Once a patch passes both
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Russell Bryant russ...@russellbryant.net
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Russell Bryant russ...@russellbryant.net
wrote:
From a high level, all patches go to a code review system. *Every* patch
must be peer reviewed (usually by 2 people, but that's
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:31 PM, George Joseph george.jos...@fairview5.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com
wrote:
And there was much rejoicing
To summarize:
* A comparison of management platforms has been done. Barring a giant
catastrophe or some
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Russell Bryant russ...@russellbryant.net
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Russell Bryant russ...@russellbryant.net
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Russell Bryant
russ...@russellbryant.net wrote:
From a high level, all patches go to a code
20 matches
Mail list logo
