---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4476/
---
(Updated March 11, 2015, 4:30 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4477/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24864
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4466/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24833
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4477/#review14643
---
branches/11/apps/app_confbridge.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4170/
---
(Updated March 11, 2015, 3:13 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
So far most of authorization between Kamailio and Asterisk relies on IP
addresses, but those need to be provisioned one by one in both sides. The
new module is practically adding a custom header with a hash over parts of
the message or other environment attributes (eg., IP address) and a
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net wrote:
So far most of authorization between Kamailio and Asterisk relies on IP
addresses, but those need to be provisioned one by one in both sides. The
new module is practically adding a custom header with a hash over parts
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4468/#review14645
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Corey Farrell
On March 10, 2015, 11:27
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4475/#review14640
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On March 11, 2015, 5:30
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4474/#review14641
---
/trunk/include/asterisk/dns_recurring.h
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
Good to see the discussion had more people and wider approach on different
levels, covering pure agnostic signaling up to specific application
constraints.
While being somehow silent, I worked to make a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4475/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers and Joshua Colp.
Repository:
On Feb. 20, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
/branches/11/include/asterisk/utils.h, lines 946-948
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4370/diff/2/?file=71539#file71539line946
I feel that configure should create a #define for the type of nested
procedure supported. This
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4370/#review14653
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Corey Farrell
On Feb. 20, 2015, 9:35
On Feb. 21, 2015, 1:24 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
/branches/11/configure.ac, line 1065
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4370/diff/3/?file=71557#file71557line1065
I missed this before / thought Josh pointed it out. This one should be
AC_MSG_ERROR as well.
Matt Jordan wrote:
On Feb. 21, 2015, 12:24 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
/branches/11/configure.ac, line 1065
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4370/diff/3/?file=71557#file71557line1065
I missed this before / thought Josh pointed it out. This one should be
AC_MSG_ERROR as well.
Matt Jordan wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4466/
---
(Updated March 11, 2015, 6:36 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On March 10, 2015, 1:26 p.m., Ed Hynan wrote:
/trunk/res/res_timing_kqueue.c, line 240
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/diff/1/?file=71888#file71888line240
Portability: at least EVFILT_USER and NOTE_TRIGGER are not defined on
all kqueue(2) systems.
Justin T. Gibbs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4474/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24834
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4478/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: testsuite
On Feb. 21, 2015, 12:24 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
/branches/11/configure.ac, line 1065
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4370/diff/3/?file=71557#file71557line1065
I missed this before / thought Josh pointed it out. This one should be
AC_MSG_ERROR as well.
Matt Jordan wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4370/#review14655
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Diederik de Groot
On Feb. 21, 2015,
On Feb. 21, 2015, 7:24 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
/branches/11/configure.ac, line 1065
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4370/diff/3/?file=71557#file71557line1065
I missed this before / thought Josh pointed it out. This one should be
AC_MSG_ERROR as well.
Matt Jordan wrote:
On March 12, 2015, 2:27 a.m., Diederik de Groot wrote:
Ship It!
Have you made a plan for addressing the warnings generated by clang's static
analysis ? There are quite a number of them, some of which seem to be quite
helpfull in pointing out some sore points, not sure if they uncover any
24 matches
Mail list logo