Daniel Pocock wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but I believe I can safely say that there is no such
thing as source code that infringes on a patent. It is the use of the
code that infringes the patent, not the code itself. I don't see how
Digium can possibly be worried about `contributory
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:29:23PM -0600, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
[snip]
The issue is that these 'alternative' G.729 codecs for Asterisk involve
the usage of code that is _not_ licensed for commercial use, nor do the
recipients of the code have the right to redistribute it in any form at
all
Patents are not the issue here, at all.
I thought they were - otherwise, everyone would be running G.729 now.
The Intel code is not licensed the as restrictively as the ITU sample
code. It also performs much better.
The issue is that these 'alternative' G.729 codecs for Asterisk
Hello Diyanat Ali ,Christian Braun and others
My g729 is working OK with the old patch
g729-rob.diff.
Now i am trying the new patch ipp-050903.diff.txt
getting following errors
I patch against the vm_types_linux32.h include and now
getting errors
gcc -I./include -I./vm/include
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 08:37 -0800, hemant surjuse wrote:
Beyond my normal annoyance at the intel G729 hack, couldn't you read
this file enough to realize you probably broke your license by mailing
this? We in the opensource world need to be very mindful of intelectual
property. Many of us are
Subject: [Asterisk-Dev] asterisk 1.2 g729 compile errors
I had sucessfully compiled and tested free g729 codec for asterisk 1.09
based on Intel ipp with patch and instructions from
http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/ipp-codecs-g729-g723.1/
I am trying to compile again with asterisk 1.2 and getting
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Dev] asterisk 1.2 g729 compile errors
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:46:59 +0100
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Nov 2005 13:50:37.0076 (UTC)
FILETIME=[36D6CD40:01C5F1C7]
Hello Ali,
try this patch against the vm_types_linux32.h include. Worked for me
