---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3496/
---
(Updated Nov. 18, 2014, 9:53 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3496/#review12419
---
/asterisk/trunk/lib/python/asterisk/asterisk.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3496/#review12137
---
/asterisk/trunk/runtests.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3496/
---
(Updated June 6, 2014, 9:06 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
On June 5, 2014, 3:57 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
/asterisk/trunk/runtests.py, lines 98-99
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3496/diff/1/?file=58127#file58127line98
I think a message could be good even when the test was already failed.
Leaks that happen due to error's are just
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3496/#review12061
---
/asterisk/trunk/lib/python/asterisk/test_case.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3496/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: testsuite
