On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Corey Farrell wrote:
> Overall I like it. I think leaving pbx_ael out of this is best as it
> might not be straight forward. Anyone who wants pbx_ael to provide
> information about config sources can create a follow-up patch once the
> core functionality is imple
Overall I like it. I think leaving pbx_ael out of this is best as it
might not be straight forward. Anyone who wants pbx_ael to provide
information about config sources can create a follow-up patch once the
core functionality is implemented.
Some thoughts:
* It would be nice if the registrar ("p
I've been working through a lot of complicated dialplan setups lately,
mostly written in AEL. Doing so has left me painfully aware of the fact
that it can sometimes be hard to trace a dialplan through its various
extensions. More so in pbx_ael of course where what you write isn't
necessarily matche