On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:14 PM, James Cloos wrote:
>> "MJ" == Matthew Jordan writes:
>
> MJ> That is incorrect. The sip_sendhtml callback will update the url
> MJ> stringfield on the SIP pvt. It then transmits a re-INVITE via
> MJ> transmit_reinvite_with_sdp.
>
> There was no re-INVITE, just
> "DG" == Dennis Guse writes:
DG> If you are in control of the SIP-Phone, you could pass additional
DG> information via SIPAddHeader in your dialplan.
Thanks. That turns out to be exactly what I wanted.
I've spent the last few years at a lower level, including when working
with voip softwa
> "MJ" == Matthew Jordan writes:
MJ> That is incorrect. The sip_sendhtml callback will update the url
MJ> stringfield on the SIP pvt. It then transmits a re-INVITE via
MJ> transmit_reinvite_with_sdp.
There was no re-INVITE, just the initial INVITE. And it did not have an
Access-URL header.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Dennis Guse wrote:
> If you are in control of the SIP-Phone, you could pass additional
> information via SIPAddHeader in your dialplan.
>
> On Jun 2, 2014 10:33 AM, "James Cloos" wrote:
>>
>> Looking at app_dial.c and chan_sip.c, I get the impression that the url
>
If you are in control of the SIP-Phone, you could pass additional
information via SIPAddHeader in your dialplan.
On Jun 2, 2014 10:33 AM, "James Cloos" wrote:
> Looking at app_dial.c and chan_sip.c, I get the impression that the url
> in a dial string cannot get sent as part of the sip INVITE, ye
Looking at app_dial.c and chan_sip.c, I get the impression that the url
in a dial string cannot get sent as part of the sip INVITE, yes?
(I base that on sip_sendhtml().)
Am I reading chan_sip correctly? Will I need to change sip_sendhtml()
to send the url as part of the INVITE?
A test call show
