On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Alexander Traud pabstr...@compuserve.com
wrote:
What you're proposing is a change to the semantics of ast_sockaddr.
Not sure what you mean by semantics. Please, let us ignore ast_sockaddr for
a second and see
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Alexander Traud
pabstr...@compuserve.com wrote:
B) Change my patch not to use a char* but char[128].
Your easiest option with less chance of regression elsewhere would be this.
Yes. Anyway: Is the Asterisk team interested in a patch at least for the 5
affected
Alexander Traud wrote:
In a patch of mine (DANE for Asterisk 13/chan_sip; available on request), a
char* was added in the struct ast_sockaddr to store the DNSSEC failure
reason (why_bogus). Not to create any memory leaks, this pointer has to be
freed. For this, the pointer must be initialized to
B) Change my patch not to use a char* but char[128].
Your easiest option with less chance of regression elsewhere would be this.
Yes. Anyway: Is the Asterisk team interested in a patch at least for the 5
affected files? These are 54 changes. I am not sure if the path via an issue
(Jira) and a