Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: agi segfaults 1.2.9.1

2006-06-22 Thread Thomas Kenyon
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote: Kevin, Slow down - it was meant to be read with a smiley. It *is* impossible to manually go through all possible combinations of parameters to make sure that they all work. In regards to the AddQueueMember, I simply forgot to add @context to the end of the device

Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: agi segfaults 1.2.9.1

2006-06-22 Thread BJ Weschke
On 6/22/06, Thomas Kenyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In regards to the AddQueueMember, I simply forgot to add @context to the end of the device name. I don't think that this should cause a segfault. On the other hand, I wouldn't expect you to be testing for

Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: agi segfaults 1.2.9.1

2006-06-22 Thread Thomas Kenyon
BJ Weschke wrote: You're reading this out of context. @context is required for Local/ interfaces specified in AddQueueMember. The segfault condition has been corrected and you get a warning on the CLI now when you do something that you should not. When I hadn't done this (back on 1.2.5) It