On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 04:49:11PM -0600, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Whatever explaination we chose what would be the preferred fix ?
1. cast the operand to int and always use %d
2. cast the operand to long and always use %ld
I don't think I like either of these
Hi,
I had the problem with recent asterisk versions that chan_modem_i4l is
only receiving noise.
I decided to examine what leads to this problems an found the reason.
This patch was applied in cvs in order to fix some gcc4 compiler
warnings and has broken receiving.
Bye,
David Arendt
---
Martin Mateev wrote:
it's friday night, at least here, get a life
Um...it's Sunday here (5:13am) and I'm still working.
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free
Good Day List,
Please accept my apology regarding posting in this list, however
I have posted in the users list and in the irc channel with no response.
Any help, url nudge etc would be greatly appreciated.
~ron
I am having a bit of an issue as it relates to the musiconhold
Ryan Courtnage wrote:
... to it. In other words, Asterisk isn't passing along the duration of
the original event.
Correct.
Is this by design? Can * be made to pass on the initial event duration?
It is by design, i.e. not accidental. There is no way to pass on the
duration at this time,
Will McCown wrote:
We're testing asterisk 1.2 Beta and I've noticed a minor
bug with the message menu on Polycom SIP phones (This is confirmed
with both a IP300 and an IP501 both running 1.4.1).
Why are you using such an old firmware version? The current release is
1.5.3, and 1.6.2 is about
On Saturday 05 November 2005 14:17, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
It is by design, i.e. not accidental. There is no way to pass on the
duration at this time, because incoming events are turned into
AST_FRAME_DTMF as they pass through the Asterisk core, and those frames
do not currently have any way
On Saturday 05 November 2005 12:45, Ronald Hartmann wrote:
Please accept my apology regarding posting in this list, however
I have posted in the users list and in the irc channel with no
response.
This list is not an appeals process for I asked elsewhere and got
no response. It is the
On Friday 04 November 2005 19:21, Martin Mateev wrote:
it's friday night, at least here, get a life
Unless you're the manager of the person posting, you have no
business regulating when he does his work.
In fact, I'd be interested in hearing about the last thing you
contributed to the Asterisk
You're right. The discrepancy does exist in the 1.0 tree. It was
fixed recently in CVS-HEAD and should certainly be in 1.2b2 and later.
On 11/5/05, Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 05 November 2005 12:45, Ronald Hartmann wrote:
Please accept my apology regarding
10 matches
Mail list logo
