---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4112/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: testsuite
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4113/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24455
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4113/#review13593
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- wdoekes
On Oct. 27, 2014, 8:03 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4111/#review13594
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- wdoekes
On Oct. 27, 2014, 5:53 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4114/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24307
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4112/#review13595
---
Ship it!
Sounds good. Note that the following three tests
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4115/
---
(Updated Oct. 27, 2014, 8:12 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
Hey there,
I've got a trivial question I hope to get a quick response to :)
I am fiddling with dahdi 2.10.0.1 on non-linux variant of UNIX. To be
more specific, I am trying to build dahdi from sources, and am a bit
confused about autoconf.
It seems that 'configure' script generated using
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4115/#review13597
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- wdoekes
On Oct. 27, 2014, 12:12 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4111/#review13598
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- rmudgett
On Oct. 27, 2014, 12:53 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4110/#review13599
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matt Jordan
On Oct. 27, 2014, 12:38
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4106/#review13600
---
Ship it!
I think this is fine to go into 13.
- Matt Jordan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4106/
---
(Updated Oct. 27, 2014, 12:54 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
I have released an updated AppKonference that compiles with Asterisk 13. You
can download the latest code from source forge:
sourceforge.net/projects/appkonference
That said Asterisk 13 doesn’t get that much attention because I use Asterisk
1.4 + some hacks. Here’s a link to my Asterisk 1.4
The reason the dial plan can never be deprecated is because Asterisk wouldn’t
be Asterisk without the dial plan. Sure, you could re-engineer Asterisk so that
it would be “better for a small select group of users at the expense of the
majority of community that use the product as designed for
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com wrote:
The reason the dial plan can never be deprecated is because Asterisk wouldn’t
be Asterisk without the dial plan. Sure, you could re-engineer Asterisk so
that it would be “better for a small select group of users at
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4116/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers and Mark Michelson.
Bugs:
dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 07:01:10PM -0300, Joshua Colp wrote:
As there is no crypto support written it is not possible to
negotiate it. Support would have to be added. All 3 variants are
implemented. Non-Documented Google, Google, and XEP.
So Google Voice's protocol
dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 07:24:27PM -0300, Joshua Colp wrote:
dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 07:01:10PM -0300, Joshua Colp wrote:
As there is no crypto support written it is not possible to
negotiate it. Support would have to be added. All 3
19 matches
Mail list logo
