On Nov. 6, 2014, 6:04 a.m., wdoekes wrote:
Isn't the better fix to disable coverage for the shadow compilation?
Corey Farrell wrote:
Probably. I have updated code but I won't have time to test until this
weekend. I'll update the review once I've had a chance to do some builds
Den 2014-11-06 21:40, Matthew Jordan skrev:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Johan Wilfer li...@jttech.se wrote:
Den 2014-11-05 08:45, BJ Weschke skrev:
As for the timestamps for deciding whether the local cache is dirty
On 28 Oct 2014, at 17:44, Russell Bryant russ...@russellbryant.net wrote:
I said this in my talk last week and will reiterate it here. I think the
Asterisk dev community has been doing an amazing job over the last few years.
Internal refactorings have been achieved that we used to dream
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4152/
---
(Updated Nov. 8, 2014, 11:28 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4151/
---
(Updated Nov. 8, 2014, 1:29 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4157/
---
(Updated Nov. 8, 2014, 6 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been marked
On 8 November 2014 07:18, Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net wrote:
On 28 Oct 2014, at 17:44, Russell Bryant russ...@russellbryant.net
wrote:
I said this in my talk last week and will reiterate it here. I think the
Asterisk dev community has been doing an amazing job over the last few
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4153/
---
(Updated Nov. 9, 2014, 1:56 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
