Re: [asterisk-dev] The CI/CD pipeline on Jenkins
Hi, > On May 14, 2022, at 1:54 PM, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > >> On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 2:04 PM Philip Prindeville >> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was trying to figure out why builds on my laptop on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and >> Openssl 1.1.1f and 3.0 both succeed, but CI/CD is failing. >> >> OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017 >> >> NAME="CentOS Linux" >> VERSION="7 (Core)" >> ID="centos" >> ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" >> VERSION_ID="7" >> PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" >> ANSI_COLOR="0;31" >> CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7" >> HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/"; >> BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/"; >> CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT="CentOS-7" >> CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT_VERSION="7" >> REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="centos" >> REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="7" >> >> Why are we building against an EOL version of CentOS and an equally old >> version of Openssl 1.0.x? > > CentOS 7 is still widely used and is something we're supporting. It's the > oldest distro I think really that we're still supporting, which is why CI/CD > uses it. Then maybe bracket things, with a 2nd build environment that's relatively modern and with current releases of runtimes and toolchains? Can we deprecate res_crypto.so on Openssl 1.0.x and say it's no longer supported? >> Can we update the CI/CD recipe to something more current? Like CentOS 8.5? > > Update? No. Add in addition? Possibly, but I don't want to sink time into it > at this point because we're planning to move away from our current > environment and usage (not for a few months, email and wiki page coming in > the future). Then... my reviews are parked until they can get a successful build? Or do we just test the reviews outside of CI/CD? I've added a workaround for the bug in Openssl 1.0.2f, and confirmed that it was fixed for the 1.1.0 release. At the very least builds against Openssl 1.1.x or 3.0 (maybe with a tag or attribute in the Gerrit review so that not every review consumes the resources unnecessarily) would give coverage... THanks, -Philip -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [asterisk-dev] The CI/CD pipeline on Jenkins
On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 2:04 PM Philip Prindeville < philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to figure out why builds on my laptop on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and > Openssl 1.1.1f and 3.0 both succeed, but CI/CD is failing. > > OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017 > > NAME="CentOS Linux" > VERSION="7 (Core)" > ID="centos" > ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" > VERSION_ID="7" > PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" > ANSI_COLOR="0;31" > CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7" > HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/"; > BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/"; > CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT="CentOS-7" > CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT_VERSION="7" > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="centos" > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="7" > > Why are we building against an EOL version of CentOS and an equally old > version of Openssl 1.0.x? > CentOS 7 is still widely used and is something we're supporting. It's the oldest distro I think really that we're still supporting, which is why CI/CD uses it. > > Can we update the CI/CD recipe to something more current? Like CentOS 8.5? > Update? No. Add in addition? Possibly, but I don't want to sink time into it at this point because we're planning to move away from our current environment and usage (not for a few months, email and wiki page coming in the future). -- Joshua C. Colp Asterisk Technical Lead Sangoma Technologies Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
[asterisk-dev] The CI/CD pipeline on Jenkins
Hi, I was trying to figure out why builds on my laptop on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and Openssl 1.1.1f and 3.0 both succeed, but CI/CD is failing. OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017 NAME="CentOS Linux" VERSION="7 (Core)" ID="centos" ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" VERSION_ID="7" PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" ANSI_COLOR="0;31" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7" HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/"; BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/"; CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT="CentOS-7" CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT_VERSION="7" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="centos" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="7" Why are we building against an EOL version of CentOS and an equally old version of Openssl 1.0.x? Can we update the CI/CD recipe to something more current? Like CentOS 8.5? Thanks, -Philip -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev