Re: [asterisk-dev] Jira / Gerrit Integration Issue

2021-06-11 Thread BJ Weschke
just wrappers > around maven. > atlas-compile and atlas-package will do it. > > > > > >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:37 AM George Joseph wrote: >> >> >>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:00 AM BJ Weschke wrote: >>> I’d be willing to take a

Re: [asterisk-dev] Jira / Gerrit Integration Issue

2021-06-10 Thread BJ Weschke
I’d be willing to take a look at it for you George. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 10, 2021, at 11:31 AM, George Joseph wrote: > >  > > You already know about the SSH host key issue related to the upgrade of > Gerrit we did on May 28th.That issue we knew about in advance so we gave >

Re: [asterisk-dev] Module Deprecation, Default Not Building, and Removal

2020-11-09 Thread BJ Weschke
Makes sense to me! Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 9, 2020, at 8:24 AM, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > >  >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 7:55 AM Joshua C. Colp wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> I just wanted to drop an email and say that this hasn't been dropped or >> anything. A 2 year option just isn't

Re: [asterisk-dev] Module Deprecation, Default Not Building, and Removal

2020-10-01 Thread BJ Weschke
now can work only with the older os etc > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:55 PM Joshua C. Colp wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 4:31 PM BJ Weschke wrote: >> >>> Four years, is indeed, really long. I do agree with this. As an example, I >>> work with an

Re: [asterisk-dev] Module Deprecation, Default Not Building, and Removal

2020-10-01 Thread BJ Weschke
I’d personally be OK with this. The more I think about this, two years is really long enough. With your approach below, someone would have an entire LTS release cycle to make any necessary integration changes that come as a result of a module that is removed. If someone complains about

Re: [asterisk-dev] Module Deprecation, Default Not Building, and Removal

2020-10-01 Thread BJ Weschke
Four years, is indeed, really long. I do agree with this. As an example, I work with another project where the work involves some integrations with software that is in the head units of vehicles. Right now, they’re working to certify and lock down code and functionality for the 2023 vehicle

Re: [asterisk-dev] Module Deprecation, Default Not Building, and Removal

2020-10-01 Thread BJ Weschke
I’m in favor of this approach as well.  On October 1, 2020 at 10:23:30 AM, Jared Smith (jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net) wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:04 AM Joshua C. Colp wrote: Not really, and I think part of the problem is that this entire thing hasn't really been documented, communicated,

Re: [asterisk-dev] Video calling

2019-11-15 Thread BJ Weschke
I’ve been using it in several production systems for nearly a year now on the 16 branch and it has yet segfault. My remaining chan_sip Asterisk 13 systems dump code at least once or twice every 3 months or so. I feel very safe saying chan_pjsip is stable enough for my production needs. Sent

Re: [asterisk-dev] write my self app. Debug

2018-09-12 Thread BJ Weschke
be your best bet to figure out what went wrong when the Asterisk instance crashed.  --  BJ Weschke Sent with Airmail On September 12, 2018 at 3:37:24 PM, i...@magnussolution.com (i...@magnussolution.com) wrote: that’s correct. I wrote a ael context with func_odbc and this work very well

Re: [asterisk-dev] write my self app. Debug

2018-09-12 Thread BJ Weschke
AGI is limited in its TPS scalability because it needs to fork an external application to complete processing. func_odbc run from within the dial plan does not need to fork anything external so it does not have the same scalability issues that present with an AGI based solution. --  BJ Weschke

Re: [asterisk-dev] write my self app. Debug

2018-09-12 Thread BJ Weschke
Why a native application? What data are you looking to store in the DB? It seems like you could do what you’re looking to do in the dial plan with func_odbc.  --  BJ Weschke Sent with Airmail On September 12, 2018 at 3:12:35 PM, i...@magnussolution.com (i...@magnussolution.com) wrote: hi

Re: [asterisk-dev] Adding a Key/Value Store mechanism to Asterisk

2017-12-22 Thread BJ Weschke
I would have an immediate use case for something like func_redis. I think it would be very useful.  On December 22, 2017 at 8:02:28 AM, Nir Simionovich (nir.simionov...@gmail.com) wrote: Abhay, Migrating astsb from SQLlite to redis isn't the topic here. I'm talking adding a new type of

Re: [asterisk-dev] ARI Bridge Behavior

2017-01-16 Thread BJ Weschke
 I think you’re referring to the asterisk-app-dev mailing list where ARI, AGI, and AMI are all covered.  http://lists.digium.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-app-dev On January 16, 2017 at 3:40:53 PM, Phil Mickelson (p...@cbasoftware.com) wrote: Re asterisk-ari list. I don't believe

Re: [asterisk-dev] Advanced feature query

2015-02-06 Thread BJ Weschke
Short answer: yes. However you'll probably want to take this to asterisk-users for the particulars and different ways it could be implemented. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2015, at 10:26 AM, David Radcliffe david.radcli...@clockworkit.co.uk wrote: Hi, Does anyone know if Asterix has

Re: [asterisk-dev] Process change proposal: allowing new features and improvements into release branches

2014-11-12 Thread BJ Weschke
+1 This sounds more than reasonable to me. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 10, 2014, at 5:57 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote: At AstriDevCon, we spent a good amount of time discussing whether or not we should allow new features or improvements to be made in release branches. As I

Re: [asterisk-dev] Asterisk 14 - Remote URI Playback

2014-11-06 Thread BJ Weschke
On 11/6/14, 4:04 PM, Matthew Jordan wrote: eg - Playback(http://myserver.com/monkeys.wavhttp://myserver.com/can.wavhttp://myserver.com/act.wavhttp://myserver.com/like.wavhttp://myserver.com/weasels.wav) --- On an empty HTTP Media cache, the previous app invocation would probably sound pretty

Re: [asterisk-dev] Asterisk 14 - Remote URI Playback

2014-11-04 Thread BJ Weschke
Matt - This is a pretty neat idea, indeed, but I've got some questions/thoughts on implementation. :-) Apologies if all of this was already considered/accounted for already.. 1) Does the entire file need to be downloaded and in place on the HTTP Media Cache before you can call an

Re: [asterisk-dev] Asterisk 14 - Remote URI Playback

2014-11-04 Thread BJ Weschke
On 11/4/14, 3:40 PM, Matthew Jordan wrote: On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:57 PM, BJ Weschke bwesc...@btwtech.com wrote: Matt - This is a pretty neat idea, indeed, but I've got some questions/thoughts on implementation. :-) Apologies if all of this was already considered/accounted for already

Re: [asterisk-dev] AstriDevCon 2014: Agenda item Deprecate AMI/AGI(Ben Klang)

2014-10-22 Thread BJ Weschke
On 10/22/14, 12:14 PM, Paul Albrecht wrote: On Oct 22, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote: Paul Albrecht wrote: Really? Shouldn’t something this major affecting the entire Asterisk community get discussed on the lists? Any idea what Leif is talking about when he says the

Re: [asterisk-dev] AstriDevCon 2014: Agenda item DeprecateAMI/AGI(Ben Klang)

2014-10-22 Thread BJ Weschke
On 10/22/14, 3:06 PM, Paul Albrecht wrote: On Oct 22, 2014, at 11:47 AM, BJ Weschke bwesc...@btwtech.com wrote: On 10/22/14, 12:14 PM, Paul Albrecht wrote: On Oct 22, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote: Paul Albrecht wrote: Really? Shouldn’t something this major

Re: [asterisk-dev] Deprecate every '* reload' CLI command?

2007-11-27 Thread BJ Weschke
Tilghman Lesher wrote: On Tuesday 27 November 2007 11:26:34 Eliel Sardanons wrote: On 11/27/07, Russell Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eliel Sardanons wrote: We could start a janitor for creating a 'foo reload' and we could make de 'module reload *.so' do a module unload;

Re: [asterisk-dev] Deprecating sip call-limit

2007-11-21 Thread BJ Weschke
Olle E Johansson wrote: 20 nov 2007 kl. 22.58 skrev BJ Weschke: Johansson Olle E wrote: Friends, Blitzrage and I had a discussion about busylevel and call-limit in chan_sip on the IRC I wanted to expand to the rest of you deveopers out there... My proposal in this discussion

Re: [asterisk-dev] More concise CLI commands - something we really want?

2007-11-15 Thread BJ Weschke
Olle E Johansson wrote: 15 nov 2007 kl. 13.22 skrev Tzafrir Cohen: On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 12:43:40PM +0100, Johansson Olle E wrote: While browsing the bug tracker today, I found a patch for adding more concise commands to the SIP channel. My personal opinion is that I don't like

Re: [asterisk-dev] Call Specific MOH

2007-03-29 Thread BJ Weschke
On 3/29/07, Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 28 March 2007 11:08, Vadim Lebedev wrote: I hope it can be integrated in mainline Why not just use the SetMusicOnHold application in the dialplan? Because app_queue won't observe that. This patch is valid, but we need to

Re: [asterisk-dev] Support for Agent channels in Bridge manager and dial plan patch

2007-01-05 Thread BJ Weschke
On 1/3/07, Moises Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have been working with the patch for the Bridge manager action and dial plan application. So far it seems to work, however, more testing is needed, this bug/feature has more than 1 year on the bugtracker, plz if someone has the time, test

Re: [asterisk-dev] Bug marshals - won't you take a look at 8188

2006-11-02 Thread BJ Weschke
On 11/2/06, Jared Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Stephen Davies wrote: I posted up a change that gets chan_iax2 to log jitter buffer stats into the logs regularly during active calls. I've also responded to the bug (#8188), but I'll repost my comments below as they're

Re: [asterisk-dev] Possible app_transcribe?

2006-09-13 Thread BJ Weschke
On 9/13/06, Slim Shady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I would like to know if anyone is interested in doing a quick and dirty custom application module to be used similar to the monitor application within features.conf. The application is for the medical industry and in my oppinion I think

Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: agi segfaults 1.2.9.1

2006-06-22 Thread BJ Weschke
On 6/22/06, Thomas Kenyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In regards to the AddQueueMember, I simply forgot to add @context to the end of the device name. I don't think that this should cause a segfault. On the other hand, I wouldn't expect you to be testing for

[asterisk-dev] The app_lock mutex in chan_agent.c

2006-06-21 Thread BJ Weschke
Short of a dev conference call earlier this week to discuss, based on JackEStorm's posts in #asterisk-bugs about his research into deadlock issues with chan_agent/app_queue I've now also taken a harder look at chan_agent.c this past week and I'm coming up with blanks at this point trying to

Re: [asterisk-dev] Asterisk instability - resolved - res_features.c

2006-04-17 Thread BJ Weschke
On 4/17/06, Dov Bigio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I made the following changes on my res_features.c to resolve an instability I had with atxfer... (Actually, I wasn't the one who did it cause I don't know C, but this worked, so I am forwarding to you so that you can confirm it makes sense

Re: [asterisk-dev] Asterisk Developers' Conference Call Proposal

2006-04-11 Thread BJ Weschke
On 4/11/06, Russell Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, We've had various attempts to have ongoing developers' conference calls in the past. Josh Colp, Kevin Fleming, and I were talking about this again today and would like to propose that we start this up again. The first

Re: [asterisk-dev] DSP pci board.

2006-03-22 Thread BJ Weschke
On 3/22/06, Wai Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Has been poking through the * source code a bit and trying to identify the most CPU demanding piece of code. Is trans-coding the most CPU demanding? I happen to have access to a DSP pci board. If I can move the encoder/decoder off the host

Re: [asterisk-dev] DSP pci board.

2006-03-22 Thread BJ Weschke
On 3/22/06, Matt Florell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2006/03/14/1456373.htm Digium Inc., the creator of Asterisk(TM), and pioneer of open source telephony, today announced the availability of new hardware solutions to enhance Asterisk transcoding and echo

Re: [asterisk-dev] What to do with RTCP ????

2006-02-27 Thread BJ Weschke
On 2/27/06, Andreas Sikkema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The RTCP branch includes improved support of RTCP, but also a reporting facility we do not use currently. Would it be useful to add this to a channel variable - or even better a CDR variable - so you can add it to CDRs and make reports

Re: Repost: Re: [asterisk-dev] How does RFC2833 get indicated to the SIP peer

2006-02-18 Thread BJ Weschke
On 2/17/06, Ed Greenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can somebody who understands chan_sip.c please explain this to me? THanks. --On Thursday, February 16, 2006 6:20 AM -0800 Ed Greenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Back in Asterisk 1.0.5, when we sent our SDP packet to the distant end, we sent

Re: [asterisk-dev] Outgoing call from MeetMe?

2006-02-15 Thread BJ Weschke
On 2/15/06, Tony Mountifield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone done any work on enhancing the MeetMe keypad menu to allow the initiation of an outgoing call which will be connected to the conference? e.g. *5 followed by the number to call. This would be very useful for adding participants

Re: [asterisk-dev] Asterisk 1.2.3 Released - Critical Update... Thanks for the stability!

2006-01-27 Thread BJ Weschke
On 1/27/06, tim panton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 26 Jan 2006, at 12:22, Rich Adamson wrote: However, in addition to the magic, anyone moving complete new code into a high visibility production network without first testing it is nuts. I agree with you, but in this case, we test 1.2

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: click-to-call cleint

2006-01-17 Thread BJ Weschke
On 1/17/06, Phil Menico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul, Can you give us the details on this: a .call file is sent to asterisk, which then calls you, detects pickup, and then calls the remote party. I am interested in making this work. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+auto-dial+out

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] [PATCH] Fix bug in handle_request_info

2006-01-13 Thread BJ Weschke
On 1/13/06, Marc Haisenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, I spotted a bug in handle_request_info: in an if condition the code assumes to receive NULL on error, while in fact it receives an empty string. The attached trivial patch fixes this. Patch is done against chan_sip.c from r8023.

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Asterisk extra logging to file

2005-12-28 Thread BJ Weschke
= notice,warning,error,debug,verbose but still extra detail is not logged into file! On 12/28/05, BJ Weschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/28/05, ast guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Connecting to asterisk through command # asterisk -r ( using ast_log fxn

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] ztdummy? is it necessary?

2005-12-28 Thread BJ Weschke
On 12/28/05, Jason DiCioccio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, I was having a conversation with someone the other day and was informed that ztdummy is basically unnecessary in BSD and perhaps in more recent linux kernels. Is this indeed the case? Would you need to run asterisk at a

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] default value of ast_opt_priority_jumping

2005-12-20 Thread BJ Weschke
On 12/20/05, Russell Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As we all already know, the n+101 priority jumping behavior of applications is being deprecated. For Asterisk 1.2, we made the default value of the global priority jumping option to be on. However, if it was a new installation,

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] New Jersey ATT Vocie T1 Asterisk Toll free not working

2005-12-01 Thread BJ Weschke
On 12/1/05, Charles Huang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Alex: After taking your suggestion change from em to fxoks, it still did not work, and this time even calling to normal PSTN number also failed? Any more suggestion? Charles Is this a dedicated LD trunk or a DID PRI trunk from

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] app_page

2005-11-17 Thread BJ Weschke
On 11/17/05, Michael Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm wanting to alter app_page so that I can specify an Alert Info sip header to send (our Polycoms are set to auto answer on that one). Eventually I would want to make it customizable, but for a first test I thought I'd try the following:

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Delphi ActiveX component

2005-11-16 Thread BJ Weschke
On 11/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody. I need develop a IAX softphone with Delphi, but i didnt find a OCX component. Anyone know how can I find this component ? Tomas I don't believe one exists as part of the standard distribution. You're welcome to roll

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Current HEAD: res_config_odbc.c compilation failure

2005-11-08 Thread BJ Weschke
Please post a bug for this in bugs.digium.com. On 11/8/05, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I hope this is not considered a -users question. If so please accept my apologies for the noise. Compilation of cvs HEAD from about two hours ago fails in res_config_odbc.c with the following

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] How to start?

2005-11-08 Thread BJ Weschke
Welcome! You can go here for some initial information about the Asterisk architecture: http://www.digium.com/downloads/AstriconEurope2005Tutorial.pdf And once you're ready, you can visit this link for information on how to contribute: http://www.asterisk.org/developers On 11/8/05, Isack

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] musiconhold -vs- musicclass problems setting the differnt class of music

2005-11-05 Thread BJ Weschke
You're right. The discrepancy does exist in the 1.0 tree. It was fixed recently in CVS-HEAD and should certainly be in 1.2b2 and later. On 11/5/05, Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 05 November 2005 12:45, Ronald Hartmann wrote: Please accept my apology regarding

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Bug 4301 - ztdummy accuracy problem

2005-10-17 Thread BJ Weschke
Are you using the name/record playback option? On 10/18/05, Chih-Wei Huang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BJ Weschke wrote: The bug was closed because the ztdummy behavior is not the specific cause for the delay problem. That patch with USE_RTC was intended to make use of the real time resource

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] SIP REINVITE

2005-05-16 Thread BJ Weschke
On 5/16/05, Olle E. Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BJ Weschke wrote: Server A (IP 192.168.1.1) Server B (IP(s) 192.168.1.2 [actual] 192.168.1.3 [vip]) Server C (IP(s) 192.168.1.4) All servers are Asterisk installs. All servers have SIP canreinvite=yes. Server A calls Server