On 26 Jan 2006, at 12:22, Rich Adamson wrote:However, in addition to the magic, anyone moving complete new code intoa high visibility production network without "first" testing it is nuts. I agree with you, but in this case, we test 1.2 stable, but not test in"time machine" mode, i mean moving the
On 1/27/06, tim panton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006, at 12:22, Rich Adamson wrote:
However, in addition to the magic, anyone moving complete new code into
a high visibility production network without first testing it is nuts.
I agree with you, but in this case, we test 1.2
On 27/01/06, tim panton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I read the patch right this was a bug where a signed 32bit quantity was
treated as if it were unsigned (or the other was around).
You'll only catch this kind of thing with lint, and/or strict use of
macros/functions to do time comparisons.
