Re: [asterisk-dev] pjsip vs cel

2015-06-11 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:30 PM, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote: RM == Richard Mudgett rmudg...@digium.com writes: RM You can specify the dialplan context incoming calls go to when defining RM the endpoint. Obviously I've done that. The issue is that the CHAN_START cel event does not

Re: [asterisk-dev] pjsip vs cel

2015-06-10 Thread Richard Mudgett
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:22 PM, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote: I've finally gotten a box setup with pjsip. I see that the CHAN_START cel event logs exten='s', context='default' instead of the INVITEd extension and the endpoint's context. All of the rest of the events log the expected

[asterisk-dev] pjsip vs cel

2015-06-10 Thread James Cloos
I've finally gotten a box setup with pjsip. I see that the CHAN_START cel event logs exten='s', context='default' instead of the INVITEd extension and the endpoint's context. All of the rest of the events log the expected data. This is unlike chan_sip. Is this a bug? Or an expected behavorial

Re: [asterisk-dev] pjsip vs cel

2015-06-10 Thread James Cloos
RM == Richard Mudgett rmudg...@digium.com writes: RM You can specify the dialplan context incoming calls go to when defining RM the endpoint. Obviously I've done that. The issue is that the CHAN_START cel event does not reflect the specified context and the INVITE's ruri like chan_sip's