hkc323 hkc323 at gmail.com writes:
SOLVED NOW
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Hi Olle,
adding Kamailio is one option, but I must admit that I don't want to
complicate the existing setup any more and Asterisk is working quite well.
Actually I can live without the feature - it would just make things more
nicer ;)
About adding this feature - I can only offer some my work
Matthew Jordan wrote:
Like a normal person, I decided to poke at the format work while
watching tornadoes track North and South of Huntsville (because really,
what else are you going to do?) After looking through Josh's notes on
the wiki [1] and the code in the team branch [2], I decided to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3480/
---
(Updated April 29, 2014, 6:19 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3479/
---
(Updated April 29, 2014, 11:29 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:
Matthew Jordan wrote:
(1) Where will the packetization of a format on a channel reside? With
the format on the channel? Or with the capability of the channel?
It has to reside in the RTP engine layer and optionally can
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:
snip
The ability to set the framing per-format, globally in a capabilities
structure, and to get the framing already exists. What doesn't exist
Matthew Jordan wrote:
snip
snip
The ability to set the framing per-format, globally in a
capabilities structure, and to get the framing already exists. What
doesn't exist is adding a format and then setting the framing as two
separate API calls. That is something that could
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:
Matthew Jordan wrote:
snip
snip
The ability to set the framing per-format, globally in a
capabilities structure, and to get the framing already exists. What
doesn't exist is adding a format and then
Matthew Jordan wrote:
snip
So something like:
read_ptime0 = ast_format_cap_get_framing(cap0,
ast_channel_rawreadformat(c0-chan));
read_ptime1 = ast_format_cap_get_framing(cap1,
ast_channel_rawreadformat(c1-chan));
write_ptime0 = ast_format_cap_get_framing(cap0,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3481/#review11778
---
branches/11/res/res_http_websocket.c
On April 29, 2014, 7:28 a.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
branches/11/res/res_http_websocket.c, line 125
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3481/diff/2/?file=58003#file58003line125
Is there any need for this since it should always be non-NULL now?
There is at least one code path where this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3481/
---
(Updated April 29, 2014, 8:14 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On April 29, 2014, 12:28 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
branches/11/res/res_http_websocket.c, line 195
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3481/diff/2/?file=58003#file58003line195
I don't see a close_sent change in here.
opticron wrote:
close_sent is set to 1 on line 206.
I meant:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3481/#review11781
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On April 29, 2014, 1:48
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3490/
---
(Updated April 29, 2014, 2:20 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3472/#review11782
---
Ship it!
/branches/12/res/res_pjsip_sdp_rtp.c
On April 29, 2014, 2:25 p.m., opticron wrote:
/branches/12/res/res_pjsip_sdp_rtp.c, lines 1080-1081
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3472/diff/1/?file=57771#file57771line1080
I guess people don't use SRTP+video/text that often...
activate isn't really used by res_rtp_asterisk,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3473/#review11784
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3491/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-23498
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3485/
---
(Updated April 29, 2014, 10:47 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3494/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-22697
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3495/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-23560
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3496/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: testsuite
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3027/
---
(Updated April 29, 2014, 1:28 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3495/#review11785
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matt Jordan
On April 29, 2014, 11:51
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3490/#review11786
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matt Jordan
On April 29, 2014, 9:20
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3501/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-22697
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3491/#review11787
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sean Bright
On April 29, 2014, 3:21
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3505/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-23381
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3506/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers, Joshua Colp and Kevin Harwell.
bridge_native_rtp up for review. One down, three hundred to go...
But onward anyway. Next on the list: format attributes!
The new specification calls for setting attributes using
ast_format_set_attr, which takes in a key/value pair along with the format
to set the attribute on. While this seems
32 matches
Mail list logo
