Hello,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Al lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any of you guys have used FOP for drag and drop transfer on 30 40 phones
environment?
how stable is that?
I'm playing with it but so far drag and dropping phone icon to another phone
disconnectes the call.
If your
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Rob Hillis wrote:
As is just about always the case, posting twice to the list within three
hours is not only unlikely to get a faster response, I would in fact imagine
it would /reduce/ your chances of getting a response at all.
I suspect he didn't. I've seen many
On 25 Apr 2008, at 15:58, lotusscript wrote:
A good while back when installing 1.2 there were major issues with UK
callerid. Asterisk 1.2 didn't recognise the callerid correctly
because
of the way BT sent the information. Sometimes before the first ring
or
just after. After applying
Hello All,
A company has two requirements:
1) They are looking to develop its own CRM
2) Second thing is that they want to develop enhancements / new features in
Asterisk like Thirdlane.
What are your comments about technology to be used. Which one would be most
beneficial in future ? PHP, JSP,
Vicidial has call center / CRM integration with asterisk ... with many years
of bug reporting ... it open source.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Kashif Naeem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello All,
A company has two requirements:
1) They are looking to develop its own CRM
2) Second thing is
AJAX!
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Arthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vicidial has call center / CRM integration with asterisk ... with many years
of bug reporting ... it open source.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Kashif Naeem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello All,
A
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Matt Florell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/25/08, Jared Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 18:48 +, Arthur wrote:
I still hope someone would enlighten us by his experience in doing
call recordings without recording to RAM Drive.
Hi to all
is it possible to retrieve the sip tag (server side) of a sip call
from the dialplan?
Thanks.
--
/*/
nik600
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ccmanager
https://sourceforge.net/projects/reportmaker
https://sourceforge.net/projects/nikstresser
OK, I think you need to home in on the differences
between the server(s)
that work fine and the one that doesn't.
As I said in my other mail, the faulty one is a
.. mono processor machine, with SMP turned on
.. running CentOS 5
.. with kernel : 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5
There are other kernels
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 15:11 +0300, Kashif Naeem wrote:
Hello All,
A company has two requirements:
1) They are looking to develop its own CRM
2) Second thing is that they want to develop enhancements / new
features in Asterisk like Thirdlane.
What are your comments about technology to
Hi list,
Regarding callback functionality, it seems that Asterisk only includes
a provision for callback in the voicemail configuration, for
authorization purposes, but not an actual callback mechanism. For
that, there are various
free 3rd party AGI (Asterisk Gateway Interface) scripts
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Benjamin Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I think you need to home in on the differences
between the server(s)
that work fine and the one that doesn't.
As I said in my other mail, the faulty one is a
.. mono processor machine, with SMP turned on
When i try to call '36946811' from the outside the call gets through,
but is rejected and the sound file is not played, this is my conf and
sip debug output:
## sip.conf
[general]
context=incoming
register = 36946811:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1234
port=5060
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
srvlookup=yes
##
Screwed up really bad. This is the correct config and sip debug:
## sip.conf
[general]
context=incoming
register = 36946811:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1234
port=5060
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
srvlookup=yes
## extensions.conf
[incoming]
exten = _X.,Background(hello-world)
## sip debug (updated)
--- SIP read from
Hi all,
we are running Asterisk SVN-branch-1.4-r114299 and face following
problem: we have a main extension (102) and other extensions (104 and 107)
When extension 104 is calling extension 107 and 107 is on the phone, the
caller is parked for 5 seconds (Park-And-Announce) and the going back to
Kashif Naeem wrote:
Hello All,
A company has two requirements:
1) They are looking to develop its own CRM
2) Second thing is that they want to develop enhancements / new features
in Asterisk like Thirdlane.
What are your comments about technology to be used. Which one would be
most
Some times ago i've started these projects:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ccmanager
https://sourceforge.net/projects/reportmaker
Now i am too busy to update them, but you can use the main logic of
ccmanager and the flexibility of reportmaker (you can define your
report via xml) to make your
Dear All;
If i need to download the source for the kernel
2.6.23.1-42.fc8-i686 (i do not need the latest one, i
need this kernel specifically), what the command to be
used?
Also, any one tried to run zaptel 1.4.10 + asterisk
1.4.19 on fedora core 8? I am facing the problem that
zaptel is not
I am facing the problem that
zaptel is not going online when booting,
most people run it from /etc/rc.local ...
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options
Install kernel-version.src.rpm with the following command:
rpm -Uvh kernel-version.src.rpm
this is from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/CustomKernel
ubuntu is better/safer/faster/has 5 year of updates ... you name it.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:31 PM, bilal ghayyad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arthur wrote:
I am facing the problem that
zaptel is not going online when booting,
most people run it from /etc/rc.local ...
I thought most people ran it from /etc/rc.d/init.d/zaptel
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
I thought most people ran it from /etc/rc.d/init.d/zaptel
here is what README file says :
Installation
Note: If using `sudo` to build/install, you may need to add /sbin to
your PATH.
--
make
make install
# To install init scripts and
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:31:32AM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
Dear All;
If i need to download the source for the kernel
2.6.23.1-42.fc8-i686 (i do not need the latest one, i
need this kernel specifically), what the command to be
used?
When all else fails, read the manual :-)
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 04:45:54PM +, Arthur wrote:
Install kernel-version.src.rpm with the following command:
rpm -Uvh kernel-version.src.rpm
this is from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/CustomKernel
ubuntu is better/safer/faster/has 5 year of updates ... you name it.
And
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Arthur wrote:
ubuntu is better/safer/faster/has 5 year of updates ... you name it.
By what criteria do you form the opinion that Ubuntu is better, safer, and
faster? Or do you have facts? I'm not looking for a flame-fest, just if
you have objective measurements to move
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 04:47:25PM +, Arthur wrote:
I am facing the problem that
zaptel is not going online when booting,
most people run it from /etc/rc.local ...
Most people who don't understand what init.d script are do that. And
later they reboot the sysetm unnecessarily
[Moving to asterisk-users]
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:55:24AM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
Dear Steve;
Thanks for your kindly reply.
First of all, which kernel u used when u used fedora
core 8?
About me, I used:
wget
http://ftp.digium.com/pub/zaptel/zaptel-1.4-current.tar.gz
Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
Most people who don't understand what init.d script are do that. And
later they reboot the sysetm unnecessarily because they can't properly
restart Asterisk.
Recall that Asterisk must be run after Zaptel. Ordering of init.d
scripts is something that is easy to assure
Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My dual proc, dual core AMD boxen show as four procs. I guess the AMD
architecture uses Hypertheading (or whatever the equivalent is for
AMD, I assume Intel owns the rights to the name Hyperthreading).
I think the more likely explanation is that two
By what criteria do you form the opinion that Ubuntu is better, safer, and
faster?
well I don't know what's your favourite but compared to fedora ... i guess
it is.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Benny Amorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My dual proc, dual core AMD boxen show as four procs. I guess the AMD
architecture uses Hypertheading (or whatever the equivalent is for
AMD, I assume Intel owns the rights to
By what criteria
its a like a car you've got to drive it to feel it.. so give it a shot
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Benny Amorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My dual proc, dual core AMD boxen show as four procs. I guess the AMD
architecture uses Hypertheading (or whatever the equivalent is for
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:24:45PM +0200, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
Most people who don't understand what init.d script are do that. And
later they reboot the sysetm unnecessarily because they can't properly
restart Asterisk.
Recall that Asterisk must be run after
Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:24:45PM +0200, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
Most people who don't understand what init.d script are do that. And
later they reboot the sysetm unnecessarily because they can't properly
restart Asterisk.
Recall that
No, a dual core processor has two cores. :)
My Quad core shows four processors.
Steve Totaro wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Benny Amorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My dual proc, dual core AMD boxen show as four procs. I guess the AMD
Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But then that gets back to my Intel C2D show as two procs. 2 x 2 = 2.
Or is C2D not four cores?
D is for duo.
/Benny
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
Does anyone have a script for manual wardialer for asterisk? not sure
if wardialer is the correct term but basically I want to call X
number say 555- through 555-0050 and be able to listen to each
call and when I hang up or press a key it will dial the next number
for me. I guess sort of
if wardialer is the correct term
this must be a predictive dialer ... which is simply a dialer that dials a
list of numbers you supply to him ... then you need to configure if for when
to pass the call to you when to hung up ... vicidial is a good project to
start with
D is for Disturbing other poeple.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Benny Amorsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But then that gets back to my Intel C2D show as two procs. 2 x 2 = 2.
Or is C2D not four cores?
D is for duo.
/Benny
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 06:41:44PM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
Does anyone have a script for manual wardialer for asterisk? not sure
if wardialer is the correct term but basically I want to call X
number say 555- through 555-0050 and be able to listen to each
call and when I
Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
Does anyone have a script for manual wardialer for asterisk? not sure
if wardialer is the correct term but basically I want to call X
number say 555- through 555-0050 and be able to listen to each
call and when I hang up or press a key it will dial the next
Got it, sorry, nothing to see here...
I thought the 2 and duo meant 2 x 2 as the name would imply (to me at least).
I stopped keeping up on processors with the exception of exceptional
hardware like the ARM, RISC, FPGA, and Itanium2.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Arthur
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
Does anyone have a script for manual wardialer for asterisk? not sure
if wardialer is the correct term but basically I want to call X
number say 555- through 555-0050 and be able to
44 matches
Mail list logo
