Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Segmentation Faults Using Skinny (v1.6.0.10)

2009-07-11 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 19:07, Fri 10 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote: And convert those phones to SIP, forget chan_skinny. Opinion time for me as well: Dont. without bugreports chan_skinny will never be on par with chan_sip. I know there are some segfaults with it here and there, but it's being worked on. --

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Segmentation Faults Using Skinny (v1.6.0.10)

2009-07-11 Thread Steve Totaro
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.infowrote: On 19:07, Fri 10 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote: And convert those phones to SIP, forget chan_skinny. Opinion time for me as well: Dont. without bugreports chan_skinny will never be on par with chan_sip. I know

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Segmentation Faults Using Skinny (v1.6.0.10)

2009-07-11 Thread Steve Totaro
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Steve Totaro stot...@asteriskhelpdesk.comwrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.infowrote: On 19:07, Fri 10 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote: And convert those phones to SIP, forget chan_skinny. Opinion time for me as well:

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Segmentation Faults Using Skinny (v1.6.0.10)

2009-07-11 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 08:58, Sat 11 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Steve Totaro stot...@asteriskhelpdesk.comwrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.infowrote: On 19:07, Fri 10 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote: And convert those phones to

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Segmentation Faults Using Skinny (v1.6.0.10)

2009-07-11 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 08:53, Sat 11 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.infowrote: On 19:07, Fri 10 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote: And convert those phones to SIP, forget chan_skinny. Opinion time for me as well: Dont. without bugreports

[asterisk-users] ooh323 and h323

2009-07-11 Thread bilal ghayyad
Hi All; To those who used H323, which u advise to use: h323 that come with Asterisk or the ooh323? Why? Anyone can advise if still need gnugk for registration or I can register the h323 endpoint on asterisk without need for gnugk? Regards Bilal

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Segmentation Faults Using Skinny (v1.6.0.10)

2009-07-11 Thread Wayne
Michiel van Baak wrote: On 19:07, Fri 10 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote: And convert those phones to SIP, forget chan_skinny. Opinion time for me as well: Dont. without bugreports chan_skinny will never be on par with chan_sip. I know there are some segfaults with it here

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Segmentation Faults Using Skinny (v1.6.0.10)

2009-07-11 Thread Jonathan Thurman
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Wayne wa...@planetwayne.com wrote: Thanks for all for the feedback with this - I'd like to help where I can - I'm building another 1.6 system for the office to try out the exchange tie in so if the general consensus is SIP is ok - then that's good for me too

[asterisk-users] MACRO-INCOMING-CALL-TO-EXTENSION

2009-07-11 Thread Danny Dias
Hello my friends, I've a doubt, i want to be able to forward the incoming calls from PSTN to my cell phone...i mean, qhen i'm out of the office i need like aq macro that helps me to forward the incoming call that goes for example to my internal extension SIP 207, i 've this macro but i can make

Re: [asterisk-users] ooh323 and h323

2009-07-11 Thread Dovid Bender
Stay away form ooh323. It tends to crash Asterisk. If you get h323 let me know. I was never able to get it working. - Original Message - From: bilal ghayyad bilmar...@yahoo.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 19:20 Subject: [asterisk-users] ooh323 and