Hello!
The T.38 Digium Fax Driver sometimes responds with a successful
sending of a fax, when in fact, the fax did not go through.
1. Where does this problem lie?
2. How to go about fixing it.
Thanks,
Elliot
--
_
-- Bandwidth
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 02:30:42AM -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:50:32AM -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am using asterisk-1.8 and I am having problems getting
conferencing to work properly. I did
Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 02:30:42AM -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:50:32AM -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am using asterisk-1.8 and I am having
Le 15/01/2011 20:38, Cédric Lemarchand a écrit :
Hello,
Hi
[...]
I am sure there are RTP packets losses somewhere, except RTP debug in
the asterisk CLI, how can i determine where the problem come from ?
[...]
You don't tell which protocol (SIP, IAX, H323) nor which asterisk
version.
Dears;
I am looking for the card that does not need an electrical power, which one? Is
the PCI express doing this?
Regards
Bilal
--
While we're at it, can someone please tell me whether I
should be using
vi or emacs? ;-)
Many thanks,
Tom
PS: Bilal: You
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Elliot Murdock murdo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
The T.38 Digium Fax Driver sometimes responds with a successful
sending of a fax, when in fact, the fax did not go through.
1. Where does this problem lie?
2. How to go about fixing it.
Thanks,
Elliot
If
James Miller wrote:
From the command you suggested to enter:
Class: default
File: /var/lib/asterisk/moh//reno_project-system
You have 1 too many // in the directory structure.
It should be:
/var/lib/asterisk/moh/reno_project-system
Not
/var/lib/asterisk/moh//reno_project-system
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 07:20:53AM -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 02:30:42AM -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:50:32AM -0500,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:29:09AM -0500, Doug Lytle wrote:
James Miller wrote:
From the command you suggested to enter:
Class: default
File: /var/lib/asterisk/moh//reno_project-system
You have 1 too many // in the directory structure.
It should be:
Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 07:20:53AM -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 02:30:42AM -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Is that really an issue? open() and all others would normally just
reduce '//' to a '/'.
That, I really wouldn't know. I'm not a programmer. I noted the
differences between mine and his.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to
On Jan 16, 2011, at 7:29 AM, bilal ghayyad wrote:
Dears;
I am looking for the card that does not need an electrical power, which one?
Is the PCI express doing this?
Regards
Bilal
Bilal,
The only telephony cards that require a power connector are those with FXS
ports for plugging in
Well... Looks like he's trying to use a streaming MOH solution like an online
radio station or something, so the files are irrelevant. Too bad the original
post didn't specify that. I still think there is a different source selected
for the call queue than for the rest of the system.
Sorry
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:53:39AM -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
'module reload chan_dahdi.so' is not the same as:
module unload chan_dahdi.so
module load chan_dahdi.so
Please try that one.
Will you? Please? What's the
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 09:20:10AM -0500, James Miller wrote:
I'm going out on a limb here, as I'm still pretty new to Astrisk and running
my own VOIP server, however I believe there is a bug or flaw with the Music
on Hold feature.
I have it all configured and it should work, and it did
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen
Sent: Sunday, 16 January, 2011 12:47
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Music on Hold not working?
On Sat, Jan 15,
MOH plays the default class unless specified by a channel variable to play a
different one. In queues.conf you can specify the MOH class on a queue by queue
basis, but that's the hold music for someone waiting to be answered. Once an
agent answers, if they put someone on hold they'll be put
That's what I'm wanting to change. I want it to stream 100% of the time no
matter if the person is in queue or if an agent has answered.
Sent from my Verizon BlackBerry. Always on, Always Connected
-Original Message-
From: Warren Selby wcse...@selbytech.com
Sender:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:20 AM, James Miller paramedi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have it all configured and it should work, and it did briefly several
weeks ago, however now, it doesn't work at all and only plays the default
hold music.
the middle, and still can not get MOH to work.
Did you
Since digium is apparently blind to users of their Free Fax for
Asterisk, does anyone have advice on how to report a crashing problem
with res_fax_digium and Asterisk 1.8.2 ?
I have detailed logs/reports and a backtrace ready, but I have no idea
who can help.
--
Jeremy Kister
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Warren Selby wcse...@selbytech.com wrote:
MOH plays the default class unless specified by a channel variable to play a
different one. In queues.conf you can specify the MOH class on a queue by
queue basis, but that's the hold music for someone waiting to be
Sorry for the top-post, on my phone...
Then change the settings in the default class to what you want, or set a
channel variable at the start of the call for the MusicOnHold class you want.
Thanks,
--Warren Selby, dCAP
On Jan 16, 2011, at 12:44 PM, James Miller paramedi...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone see any issues here? I cannot get it to work.
Passwords are not real!
[general]
;register = 999:999...@carrier.callwithus.com
register = 999:999...@sip.callwithus.comi
context=default
port=5060
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
srvlookup=yes ; enable DNS SRV server
[joesipshow]
type=friend
On 11-01-16 03:58 PM, Thomas Perron wrote:
Does anyone see any issues here? I cannot get it to work.
Passwords are not real!
No, however you did not provide any debug logs [1].
[1] https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Collecting+Debug+Information
--
Paul Belanger
Digium, Inc. |
On 11-01-16 03:37 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote:
Since digium is apparently blind to users of their Free Fax for
Asterisk, does anyone have advice on how to report a crashing problem
with res_fax_digium and Asterisk 1.8.2 ?
I don't believe Digium is blind to its users: Users of Free Fax For
OK. I set up the logger.conf via the steps provided.
Now, how do I get the results. I reproduced the scenario.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Paul Belanger pabelan...@digium.com wrote:
On 11-01-16 03:58 PM, Thomas Perron wrote:
Does anyone see any issues here? I cannot get it to work.
On 01/17/2011 04:37 AM, Jeremy Kister wrote:
Since digium is apparently blind to users of their Free Fax for
Asterisk, does anyone have advice on how to report a crashing problem
with res_fax_digium and Asterisk 1.8.2 ?
Use spandsp.
I have detailed logs/reports and a backtrace ready, but I
Shaun Ruffell sruffell at digium.com writes:
Whatever your preferred style, the following post is at least worth
considering.
http://brooksreview.net/2011/01/interleaved-email/
My belief is that it would be nearly impossible for me to follow a high
volume list if top posting was the
I hate to disagree but I find it much, much easier to follow conversations when
the newest reply is on top. I find it too time consuming to scroll through a
long message just to find out someone left a three word reply.
As I am on my blackberry more than I am at a pc, if I don't see the reply
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 02:31 +, James Miller wrote:
I hate to disagree but I find it much, much easier to follow conversations
when the newest reply is on top. I find it too time consuming to scroll
through a long message just to find out someone left a three word reply.
As I am on my
When you get over 500 emails a day on your blackberry you have make a decision
on what is or is not worth reading at that moment.
Its not lazy at all its cutting through the fluff and finding the emails worth
while. When inside outlook you don't have the hot key b to scroll to the
bottom so
On Sunday 16 January 2011 20:47:56 James Miller wrote:
When you get over 500 emails a day on your blackberry you have make a
decision on what is or is not worth reading at that moment.
Clearly, then, the problem is your blackberry. Ditch it. Or stop
subscribing to list email on a device which
On 1/16/2011 4:13 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
I don't believe Digium is blind to its users: Users of Free Fax For
Asterisk are not entitled to any Digium technical support [1].
I'm not looking for technical support; I'm just looking for a way to
report a bug and possibly help debug/resolve it.
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 21:43 -0500, Fred Posner wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 02:31 +, James Miller wrote:
I cannot imagine considering scrolling to the end of an email time
consuming. Very sad. If you find it too difficult on your blackberry to
press the B key (to jump to the bottom of the
We obviously have all our own opinions about being on top or bottom.
And it boils down to personal preference obviously.
I think in all cases, top posting is by far superior. But I think the
battle will continue ad infinitum.
One, because of speedups in finding the most recent content which
On 01/16/2011 10:28 PM, Mark Murawski wrote:
We obviously have all our own opinions about being on top or bottom. And
it boils down to personal preference obviously.
And it looks like I top posted, heh. I just usually hit reply and start
typing, the default is top.
I guess I go both ways.
Surely there is some mail client smart enough to be able to flip around
the levels of indenting so most recent is top or bottom.
If not quit bitching and make one - I will continue top posting since I
don't seem to be alone in preferring it.
On 01/16/2011 10:28 PM, Mark Murawski wrote:
We
On 01/17/2011 10:31 AM, Mark Murawski wrote:
On 01/16/2011 10:28 PM, Mark Murawski wrote:
We obviously have all our own opinions about being on top or bottom. And
it boils down to personal preference obviously.
And it looks like I top posted, heh. I just usually hit reply and
start typing,
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 02:47 +, James Miller wrote:
When you get over 500 emails a day on your blackberry you have make a
decision on what is or is not worth reading at that moment.
Its not lazy at all its cutting through the fluff and finding the emails
worth while. When inside
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman
Lesher
Sent: Sunday, 16 January, 2011 22:18
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On
On 11-01-16 10:18 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote:
I'm not looking for technical support; I'm just looking for a way to
report a bug and possibly help debug/resolve it. But as you know,
Digium's website gives FFA users no clear to contact them - even to
report problems. issues.asterisk.org has no
Hi,
I thought this kind of discussion didn't exists in asterisk list.
I guess most tech list members will argue on top-vs.-bottom subject at
some point :)
anton
It only exists when someone starts the discussion. The top posters never
start it.
Bottom posting wouldn't be bad if the
James M Miller wrote:
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman
Lesher
Sent: Sunday, 16 January, 2011 22:18
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re:
43 matches
Mail list logo
