Hi am
I am using 1.4 asterisk and asterisk GUI. If I do moh upload its is
not working .help me on this
Thanks
Nikhil
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a
On 06/01/2011 05:42 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:10:34PM +0200, randall wrote:
On 06/01/2011 03:55 PM, randall wrote:
On 06/01/2011 03:41 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:06:02AM +0200, randall wrote:
Hi all,
After running fine for a few months now
Are you suggesting that there are no bugs in 1.4 or 1.6?
Currently there seems to be a fear of 1.8. We're about to put it into
production and yes, we've had issues with it, mostly due to the fact we
use RealTime, but before you change anything it is always advisable to
test the hell out of it.
On Thursday 02 Jun 2011, khalid touati wrote:
Hi Guys,
Actually My question is as in the subject, may I use a regular phone line
to receive faxes with FFA (Fax For Asterisk), I am using asterisk 1.6.2.8.
Yes, you can. BUT, you will need some sort of FXO interface (allows the
computer to
If 1.8 doesn't panic for subset of PBX features for someone, you can not say
it is stable. You should also look at other
features and how they work with 1.8.
I didn't say 1.4 or 1.6 have no bugs or issues. When there were 1.4 or 1.6.0
branches, they did have bugs. But since people
started
I am thinking about using numbers from voxbone. Before I make up my mind if
this is the right service for me I want to know what kinds of details will be
found when checking up on a voxbone number.
I am interested in UK numbers. Can anyone give an example on an actual voxbone
number in
I am thinking about using numbers from voxbone. Before I make up my mind if
this is the right service for me I want to know what kinds of details will be
found when checking up on a voxbone number.
I am interested in UK numbers. Can anyone give an example on an actual voxbone
number in
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:28 AM, devr devr d...@gmx.com wrote:
I am thinking about using numbers from voxbone. Before I make up my mind if
this is the right service for me I want to know what kinds of details will
be found when checking up on a voxbone number.
I am interested in UK numbers.
Voxbone works correctly, no problem, the only problem is that you need
to spend a minimum amount of 500€/month to open an account...
Best regards,
Olivier
Le 3/06/11 11:58, randulo a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:28 AM, devr devrd...@gmx.com wrote:
I am thinking about using numbers
thanks for your reply
This is the details I get
Locality
Alloa, Clackmannanshire
Charging
B1 National
Operator
Voxbone SA
Locality
Alloa, Clackmannanshire
Charging
B1 National
Operator
Voxbone SA
My query now is willl all voxbone numbers show up as the operator as Voxbone
Yesterday my 1.8 got crashed and I have nothing in log or anywhere
which I can show you or submit bug. Kinda funny :(
--
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Satish Barot satish4aster...@gmail.com
wrote:
If 1.8 doesn't panic for subset of PBX features for someone, you can
On 3 Jun 2011, at 11:57, devr devr wrote:
My query now is willl all voxbone numbers show up as the operator as Voxbone
SA as above. I wanted to find out who the service provider is on some
numbers, I suspected the service to be voxbone but the operator shows as
other companies.
My idea
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, devr devr wrote:
thanks for your reply
This is the details I get
Locality
Alloa, Clackmannanshire
An intersting place... I spent my youth in a small town near there. (Not
that Alloa is a particularly big town to start with!) Central Scotland.
Full of history and places
Yeah I am using a TDM410P, thanks for the answer.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:30 AM, A J Stiles asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.ukwrote:
On Thursday 02 Jun 2011, khalid touati wrote:
Hi Guys,
Actually My question is as in the subject, may I use a regular phone line
to receive faxes with FFA (Fax
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Satish Barot wrote:
With due respect to Digium work, are there no issues with Asterisk 1.8?
https://issues.asterisk.org/view_all_bug_page.php
And the first of those is a real show stopper at least for us. We've got to
have multiple parking lots and that has been
Hey Guy,
I want to implement Queue base custom ring tone so Agent will get aware of
incoming call for sale or tech etc.. I know its possible with SIPAddHeader
http://www.technicallyamusing.com/?p=44
I am confused here
alertInfo voIpProt.SIP.alertInfo.1.value=custome-ring
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
Kevin P. Fleming
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:51 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] benefits of asterisk 1.8
On
On 6/3/2011 9:49 AM, satish patel wrote:
But unfortunately i compiled with DON'T OPTIMIZED option do you
think it will generate dumpcore in that case ?
Yes, it will create a coredump. Telling the compiler to not optimize
(IIRC) leaves more debugging info in the binary for dumps
--
Sherwood,
I was wrong here
But unfortunately i compiled with DON'T OPTIMIZED option do you
think it will generate dumpcore in that case ?
I have just cross check and we have option OPTIMIZED. That mean don't create
coredump right ?
-S
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:53:01 -0500
From:
I don't know the statistics involved, but not allowing the compiler to optimize
would almost assuredly have some negative effect on performance
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:16 AM, satish patel satish...@hotmail.com wrote:
But anyway let me set coredump=yes in asterisk.conf
Do
Paul Belanger pabelan...@digium.com writes:
Sounds like asterisk was not told to generate a coredump, add the
following, then you can generate a backtrace[1]:
asterisk.conf
[options]
dumpcore = yes
The challenge with Asterisk and core dumps is that the Asterisk user
often does not have
(reposted with correct subject line, I think messing up the subject
line last time prevented my question from being read. Cheers :)
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Jesse Thompson jes...@gmail.com wrote:
Letting a carrier use you as a carrier seems like quite a bad idea
generally..
I think I
Why not setup a default catch-all route that goes to either your main line (to
drive sales) or a pre-recorded message (the number you dialed is
disconnected...etc), and then setup more specific pattern matches for assigned
numbers? I've done this before for clients that have large blocks of
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 09:07 +0100, Ishfaq Malik wrote:
Are you suggesting that there are no bugs in 1.4 or 1.6?
I presume that you are aware of the fact that it is impossible to prove
the absence of bugs in any piece of software
You might not have detected them yet.
Furthermore behaviour
24 matches
Mail list logo
