Re: [asterisk-users] INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway

2019-01-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 07:29 -0700, George Joseph wrote: > When you have an "identify" object configured, you should just use > "ip" as > the "identify_by", But isn't ip the highest priory check in the default value of endpoint_identifier_order and by extension, wouldn't an endpoint without an

Re: [asterisk-users] INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway

2019-01-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 07:29 -0700, George Joseph wrote: > > What version of Asterisk 13.11.1 I know, I could stand to upgrade. > and what's the value of the "identify_by" > parameter for the endpoint? It doesn't have one. I guess you are implying it should have one. > When you have an

Re: [asterisk-users] INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway

2019-01-28 Thread George Joseph
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 10:56 AM Brian J. Murrell wrote: > I have a trunk set up for the DID from my provider: > > [my_provider] > type=registration > outbound_auth=my_provider > server_uri=sip:sip.example.com > client_uri=sip:my_usern...@sip.example.com > retry_interval=60 > > [my_provider] >