Re: [asterisk-users] I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?

On 14/05/2020 16:41, Joshua C. Colp wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:31 AM John Hughes > wrote: On 14/05/2020 08:10, John Hughes wrote: I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using either g729 or alaw.  I can do alaw but not g729 so asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?

Argh. That was for chan_pjsip and you are using chan_sip. Be aware that chan_sip is effectively dead. Richard On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 9:50 AM Richard Mudgett wrote: > The other end is sending g729 even though it was not negotiated. The > other end should not do this and it usually seems

Re: [asterisk-users] I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?

The other end is sending g729 even though it was not negotiated. The other end should not do this and it usually seems that the other ends that do send g729. This was recently fixed. See https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28139 Richard On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 1:11 AM John Hughes

Re: [asterisk-users] I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:31 AM John Hughes wrote: > On 14/05/2020 08:10, John Hughes wrote: > > I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using either g729 or > alaw. I can do alaw but not g729 so asterisk should negotiate alaw right? > In fact from the sip debug it looks like it

Re: [asterisk-users] I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?

On 14/05/2020 08:10, John Hughes wrote: I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using either g729 or alaw.  I can do alaw but not g729 so asterisk should negotiate alaw right?  In fact from the sip debug it looks like it does, but then I get the dreaded "channel.c:5630

Re: [asterisk-users] I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?

On 14/05/2020 16:08, Michael L. Young wrote: I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using either g729 or alaw.  I can do alaw but not g729 so asterisk should negotiate alaw right?  In fact from the sip debug it looks like it does, but then I get the dreaded

Re: [asterisk-users] I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?

> From: "John Hughes" > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List, Non-Commercial Discussion" > > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 2:10:45 AM > Subject: [asterisk-users] I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and > alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY? > I am having a problem with

[asterisk-users] I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?

I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using either g729 or alaw.  I can do alaw but not g729 so asterisk should negotiate alaw right?  In fact from the sip debug it looks like it does, but then I get the dreaded "channel.c:5630 set_format: Unable to find a codec translation path: