Sorry for the noise, ${ANSWEREDTIME} do the job, CDR's can be forgetted.
Le 10/07/2020 à 16:08, Administrator a écrit :
I forgot to mention that I need billsec and in all those cases I have
2 seconds and not 258 as it should
Le 10/07/2020 à 15:58, Administrator a écrit :
Hi,
in dialplan
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 4:59 PM John Covici wrote:
>
> But the question is, are his statements correct that we need some
> service -- not necessarily his -- to sign the call before sending it
> to our normal carrier, or will the normal carrier -- whoever -- sign
> the call if they know the
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users On Behalf Of
Matthew Fredrickson
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 2:44 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Stir Shaken
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:34 PM Saint Michael wrote:
>>
>> There is a
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
Some of us may actually be interested in what you have to offer if you
changed the way you were presenting it. Who is going to base their
business on some list guy with a gmail address?
And can't follow directions and honor the mailing list rules.
I used their scam checking service. Below is part of the dialplan I
used. I don't know how their STIR/SHAKEN service works the same.
same = n,GosubIf($[${LEN(${CALLERID(num)})} == 11]?scam-check,${EXTEN},1)
same = n,Goto(from-pstn,${EXTEN},1)
[scam-check]
exten = _XX.,1,Noop
same =
On 7/13/20 2:32 PM, Saint Michael wrote:
There is a big confusion here about Stir Shaken. It is NOT a
provider issue. Un fact, all providers are whasing their hands and
modifying their swihtches to pass-through the Signature. They
cannot sign the call because then the become the
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:44:12 -0400,
Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:34 PM Saint Michael wrote:
> >>
> >> There is a big confusion here about Stir Shaken. It is NOT a provider
> >> issue. Un fact, all providers are whasing their hands and modifying their
> >> swihtches
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:34 PM Saint Michael wrote:
>>
>> There is a big confusion here about Stir Shaken. It is NOT a provider issue.
>> Un fact, all providers are whasing their hands and modifying their swihtches
>> to pass-through the Signature. They cannot sign the call because then the
>
> There is a big confusion here about Stir Shaken. It is NOT a provider
> issue. Un fact, all providers are whasing their hands and modifying their
> swihtches to pass-through the Signature. They cannot sign the call because
> then the become the responsible party for the call before the FCC,
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:59 PM Michael Maier wrote:
> On 13.07.20 at 10:54 Joshua C. Colp wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 11:37 PM Michael Maier
> wrote:
> >> One more question,
> >> what about the pjsip pcap support? Will it be backported to Asterisk 16,
> >> too? Would be absolutely cool!
On 13.07.20 at 10:54 Joshua C. Colp wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 11:37 PM Michael Maier wrote:
>> One more question,
>> what about the pjsip pcap support? Will it be backported to Asterisk 16,
>> too? Would be absolutely cool! Debugging encrypted SIP is really a pain.
>>
>
> It can't be
Thanks Josh for clarifying! I'd assumed it would be backported but
didnt want to just assume :) Thanks Matt for doing the video! (hint hint
theres a load of good content THIS WEEK over on the commcon youtube channel
but that's all I'll say about that here)
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 9:55 AM Joshua
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 11:37 PM Michael Maier wrote:
> On 13.07.20 at 00:17 Joshua C. Colp wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 7:12 PM Dan Jenkins wrote:
> >
> >> Asterisk 18 will have support based on this asterisk update Matt F did
> for
> >> CommCon's sponsor slots
> >>
> >>
13 matches
Mail list logo
