[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the people who would suspect digium is strong-arming anyone,
hell, if it weren't for them you wouldn't have asterisk would you? And
therefore probably no openpbx either, and we all would be spending
thousands to do what asterisk can do for free.
And if it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Millions of dollars in hardware sales? I admit I don't know what there
sales level is, but I doubt that it's 1 mil at this stage in the game.
And, if it were, that has nothing to do with profit. You can make 1 mil
in sales in a year but still walk away with a net
Jonathan k. Creasy wrote:
It doesn't look like they have any goals yet...
Goals:
The goal of the project is to produce a free Software PBX that will be
highly robust and stable, featureful, and easy to use and deploy. We will
build a positive forward-thinking community around OpenPBX.org
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
I guess I read 1 more FAQ than you. But I'm not sure how quoting a
Google FAQ is libelous FUD.
Your original message did not quote a Google FAQ, it accused Digium of
joining the SoC program only to collect the $500 mentoring fees. I
believe
On 2005-07-22 11:49:50 -0400, Kevin P. Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
So what are they planning on doing with the Google Summer of Code results?
http://code.google.com/summfaq.html#what_licenses_will_i_have
What licenses will I have to choose from?
This depends
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
The first two statements are true; the third is not.
While you can certainly distribute the code you contribute to us via any
other means you wish (under any other license you wish, including the
GPL), the Digium Asterisk source tree cannot accept GPL only code.
So
Kevin Walsh wrote:
One piece of good news can be found here:
http://www.asterisk.org/index.php?menu=summer_of_code
The requirements say nothing about being asked to sign a disclaimer,
so perhaps either Google have views on this sort of practice, or people
will be quietly rejected,
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
Further his point seems to be anti BSD license. If I write software and
give it away free what difference does it make to me if someone sells
it. They still have to find someone who is willing to pay for it when
they could get it from me for free.
* Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050529 21:07]:
On Sunday 29 May 2005 20:59, Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
1) Simply CVS head (as of some point in time) with certain features or
bug fixes backed out
2) In addition to CVS head, some important features and bug fixes.
I think it's simply
...
a.
--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to see more than 1 digit?
Thanks,
--
Aidan Van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Developer +1 215 438-4638 x8103
iFAX Solutions, Inc.http://www.ifax.com
to the 1.0 branch as well? Or will I
have to carry this change locally?
--
Aidan Van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Developer +1 215 438-4638 x8103
iFAX Solutions, Inc.http://www.ifax.com
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050203 15:52]:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 03:08:57PM -0500, Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
* Dennis Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050203 13:59]:
Try setting
emdigitwait=500
this is the time it waits for DTMF digits on a EM T1 channel
This only came
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote:
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
And how many routers and firewalls out there do support OpenVPN? Do
Cisco routers support it?
Neither I, nor anyone else here, seems to be saying that OpenVPN is a
replacement for IPsec. There's
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Friday 30 July 2004 19:51, Mike Benoit wrote:
Tuning these [PCI latencies] should allow you to give your TDM cards
long burst lengths, and make your IDE devices very premptable...
I would have figured you want very short burst lengths to prevent any one
device
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Friday 30 July 2004 19:51, Mike Benoit wrote:
Tuning these [PCI latencies] should allow you to give your TDM cards
long burst lengths, and make your IDE devices very premptable...
I would have figured you want very short burst lengths to prevent any one
device
16 matches
Mail list logo
