On April 1, 2009 01:32:18 pm Jason Aarons (US) wrote:
I don't think a off the shelf modem has the necessary DSPs to convert
voice to codecthat is why a Voice Gateway/Analog Telephony Adapter
or FXO/FXS cards exist instead of modem having a second life.
There are no DSPs in any of the
On March 30, 2009 12:48:59 pm randulo wrote:
Except for roaming and in particular international roaming, isn't the
best plan to forward calls the iPhone. It is a phone, too isn't it? Or
just a game platform, browser and GPS?
That's pretty much what I do; I use siax (I have a jailbroken iPhone)
On January 2, 2009 01:44:14 pm David wrote:
2007
2006
Andrew Kohlsmith 290
2005
Andrew Kohlsmith 731
Damn... I'm slipping! 2nd place in 2005.
-A.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
On December 17, 2008 05:03:00 pm Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
To me top posting is like people talking about SIP Trunks. There is
no such thing as a SIP Trunk. There are SIP connections, peers,
friends, etc. The term is simply a marketing buzzword to make people
that don't know much about
On December 17, 2008 06:59:19 pm David fire wrote:
you are soamming my mail box whit this useless discution
the solution is doble posting (top and bottom)
It's a public mailing list. If you're having trouble managing it, you may
want to try a digest version, or perhaps a moderated list.
-A.
On December 4, 2008 08:31:40 pm Matt Gibson wrote:
1st place: An APSTel dial plan (professional license) donated by -- you
guessed it - APSTel!
2nd place: An Aastra 57I IP telephone donated by Ottawa Phone Systems and
Flewid Inc!
3rd place: An APSTel dial plan (standard license) donated by
On December 2, 2008 07:55:00 pm Erik (Caneris) wrote:
Nuance would say no :)
I'd say maybe. Call up +14164854854, it's a recent project we did for a
That's pretty cool! Is there any SIP or IAX access to this (aside from
dialing a POTS number) ?
-A.
On December 4, 2008 02:14:52 pm Erik (Caneris) wrote:
Thanks. Unfortunately no SIP/IAX access at this time, only by dialing one
of the TNs. However, I'll bring it up with the client and see if they'd
want us to configure that.
Definitely would be cool, you don't lose any ad revenue and I don't
On December 1, 2008 07:21:33 pm Doug wrote:
Hmmm. When our users are pounding the network
with BitTorrent traffic, we just shut them down
and wait for them to complain. It's against our
Acceptable Use Policy, and causes all sorts of
VOIP headaches.
As someone who is the technical lead for
On October 29, 2008 10:19:36 am Bill Michaelson wrote:
I'm wondering how prevalent the practice of physically segregating voice
and data networks is in the Real World.
What are the factors that typically lead to such a decision?
DIscussions of pros and cons are most welcome by me.
On October 28, 2008 12:58:25 pm JD wrote:
The folks that devloped the fax V.protocols took into acount typical
copper problems like noise or echo. But what they never conceived of as
even being possible is that a call might shift around in the time
domain. Thanks to jitter/latency, the delay
On October 27, 2008 02:01:43 pm Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
Speaking of fring, I just got my brand new iphone 3G. Anyone have any
comments on how well fring or any other sip client (siphon?) works on
iphone?
I do not like fring. It's buggy, it's unstable, it looks goofy -- but I
have to say that
On October 3, 2008 04:15:26 pm Tariq .. wrote:
it is FRING i'm sorry for the mistype...
www.fring.com
I just downloaded it for the iphone... it's pretty cheap looking, crashes
occasionally and appears to force all audio through their server, but I have
to say that yes, it does have potential.
On October 3, 2008 08:56:34 pm Philipp Kempgen wrote:
I could live with 1 or maybe 2 of these issues but 5 is a bit
much. You didn't even notice these problems, so, ok, sorry for
being rude. But for people who are used to email in ages it feels
like a punch in the face. It's a real culture
On October 5, 2008 12:22:37 pm Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Thunderbird could probably render his text/html part just fine but
I don't want it to. (Nothing is wrong with preferring text/plain in
the MUA.)
Thus it renders his text/plain part which lacks line breaks.
I posted some links to the list
On September 25, 2008 09:01:52 am Dean Collins wrote:
Yep you got it world coverage includes all the countries of the
world like USA, Canada and Mexico, and not something like USA and 212
other countries globally.
BTW I hear that Iraq also now uses CDMA (some senator shoe-horned it
into
On September 25, 2008 10:41:45 am Drew Gibson wrote:
Once CDMA has gone the way of the dodo in North America, I really will
miss one of my favourite scenes:-
Visiting Brit steps off plane and checks phone for messages...
Puzzled look appears as they ask Why doesn't my phone work? It worked
Good morning,
I have a Bell Canada PRI here (switchtype=national) and I am trying to perform
a call-forward-unconditional on one of the DIDs.
The idea is that when DID 5551234 receives a call, Asterisk redirects it back
out the same PRI to some external number.
This is simple enough to do
On August 23, 2008 07:57:33 pm Alex Balashov wrote:
Yes, indeed. Encapsulation protocols such as IPSec/GRE won't work at
all over high RTT latency (= 400 ms).
Why not? Is there some kind of timing involved in encapsulating data that I'm
not aware of?
-A.
On August 11, 2008 06:59:23 pm JR Richardson wrote:
So my question is this: Can I setup Asterisk to only allow t.38 pass
through from these ATA's, without the need to use the #99 in every dial
string from the fax machine?
Can you use disallow/allow with UDPTL? I'm not sure, I've never played
On July 24, 2008 04:42:42 pm David Cook wrote:
Have the Norstar programmer send all 3 digit, unused extensions to the PRI.
Then Asterisk will see 221, etc. and can handle at your dialplan sees fit.
Yes, this works, but you won't be able to treat those as regular extensions;
the Nortel will
On July 17, 2008 11:44:07 am Dean Collins wrote:
1/ RD costs v's number of units manafactured per annum.
That's bullshit; There are many more office phones than office desktops out
there, and the research has been paid for many times over. Think of how long
the Meridian 1 has been around.
On June 23, 2008 08:08:53 am OCG Technical Support wrote:
I little more digging and I confirmed that cell phone VM and FAX waiting
icons are in fact controlled by a proprietary SMS message format. Here's
what I found:
Yes; this is the same sticking point I hit; you can't use an SMS email
On June 17, 2008 01:45:43 am randulo wrote:
The screwdriver is reversible, it swings both ways, pull out the shank
and stick it in the other way, it becomes a Phillips. I'm tellin ya,
there Digium engineers are good!
Most every pocket screwdriver that is sold as a promotional item is like
On June 15, 2008 12:04:01 pm randulo wrote:
Moving day, everything packed. Including tools! But wait, there in the
jar with pens and pencils... it looks like. Yes, it's the Digium
Asterisk tweaker!
THANKS Digium!
Before you ask, it's 1.0 I think.
?
-A.
On June 16, 2008 07:22:18 pm Mark Hamilton wrote:
How come he has it, and he's in Paris! I'm in Toronto, and I don't have it?
Yeah, me too. I even got a mention in the book, but no screwdriver? :-(
-A.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
On June 4, 2008 06:20:57 pm Joe Carroll wrote:
Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing
Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484
That really looks like the switch that the TNT is talking to is rejecting the
number, not the TNT...
-A.
On May 5, 2008 01:58:42 pm Tilghman Lesher wrote:
Hmm. Haven't found any Digium Stockholm office to discuss with ;-)
That hasn't stopped any of the Canadian employees. :-)
That's because nothing stops Canadians, short of Hockey Night in Canada :-)
-A.
On May 4, 2008 07:24:45 pm Rob Hillis wrote:
Customer's insistence. We didn't have a choice, really.
Nothing wrong with that, it just adds more billable hours. :-)
-A.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
On May 4, 2008 08:40:10 pm Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Customer's insistence. We didn't have a choice, really.
Nothing wrong with that, it just adds more billable hours. :-)
As long as it does.
I don't know about you, but whenever a customer wants me to do work and does
not want to follow my
On May 2, 2008 03:13:40 pm Norman Franke wrote:
enter the four-digit extension of the person you are trying to reach
I would suggest breaking that up
Please enter the
digit
extension of the person you are trying to reach
then you can use the individual numbers and fill in 2 digit, 3 digit,
On May 1, 2008 11:39:52 am Tony Mountifield wrote:
Does anyone know if the Digium PRI cards can be configured or modified
to have a high-impedance input on the RX pair? I would be interested in
this in order to build a bi-directional PRI audio sniffer using two
E1/T1 ports per trunk to be
On April 12, 2008 03:12:31 am Col Ferguson wrote:
Hello,
I have a system in a motel that needs call billing data output through its
serial port so the existing motel management software can collect the call
billing info.
Is there any easy way to redirect the data that goes into the
On April 7, 2008 02:01:08 am Alex Balashov wrote:
A Lucent TNT Max outfitted with _plethoric_ VFCs might work okay. Apex
too, perhaps. Haven't tried to see how much it can handle when TDM-RTP
translation is required.
I'm curious; are the cpu/tdm/dsp requirements for 672 g729 rtp streams that
On April 6, 2008 11:12:33 am Steve Totaro wrote:
I cannot recommend the Adtran MX2800 M13, it has redundant everything
and is very easy to setup and not very expensive either.
Agreed; I've set these up and they are rock effing solid. We did have a shelf
controller die and without the backup
On March 25, 2008 02:15:42 pm Lacy Moore wrote:
I think that is one of the biggest things that businesses overlook
when switching to Voip. It's hard to get in the directories.
I have to say that it's been many years (well before voip) that I've gone to
the directories. Google and yellow
On March 24, 2008 02:38:03 am mark morreny wrote:
What I need to do is to try to route called based on the dialed number as I
have multiple DIDs on my line. Is this something that can be done? Is
this something to do with the hardware that I am using? If so, what kind
of hardware do I need
On March 20, 2008 02:33:52 pm Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 20.03.2008, 16:59 +0200 schrieb Tzafrir Cohen:
And what happens if at the time of the shutdown there was a
ROTFL
Trafrir, you made my day.
Oh god, I didn't realize that wasn't a typo until you wrote that...
On March 19, 2008 12:43:21 pm Bill Andersen wrote:
I'm a USER of Asterisk. We purchased 3 commercially available
Asterisk Based PBXs a little over a year ago. (I won't mention
which one at this point - I don't want to bad mouth them - yet!)
Two of the systems are very small (5 SIP lines/6
On March 19, 2008 07:00:20 pm Steve Totaro wrote:
I would not consider a Dell SC440 w/RAID 1 Server Grade you can
pick them up for $250 on sale.
Why not? Is the price not high enough, or is there some technical reason? I
ask because your only explanation as to why it's not server grade
On March 19, 2008 05:05:05 pm Bill Andersen wrote:
CentOS release 4.4 (Final)
Kernel 2.6.9-34.0.2.ELsmp (SMP)
Asterisk 1.4.16.2
Dell SC440 w/RAID 1
Digium TE120P
The GUI is a commercially available product, to remain un-named at this
point.
Ok, and what specifically are the types of
41 matches
Mail list logo
