On Oct 24, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Wilton Helm wrote:
I've been following this thread and trying to sort out what is
wanted, what is available, and why. Comments to the following would
be appreciated and might be useful to others.
1. Why would anyone originate a FAX via VoIP? If it has to go
in the case
;; of using IMAP storage.
;
;pollfreq=30 ; If the pollmailboxes option is enabled,
this option
;; sets the polling frequency. The default is
once every
;; 30 seconds.
Maybe that will help?
Brendan Martens
Quite right... And so we can all stop repeating ourselves; Steven has
already done a great writeup on all this: http://www.soft-switch.org/foip.html
Brendan Martens
On Oct 27, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Wilton Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED
? But if it were coming in as t.
38 that is all there would be to it?
Thanks once again for taking the time to answer my questions.
Brendan Martens
On Oct 24, 2008, at 3:22 AM, Olivier wrote:
2008/10/23 Brendan Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Indeed I am going for pure voip and trying to figure out how
Do you have any recommendations for good ones, or, non-buggy ones?
Brendan Martens
On Oct 24, 2008, at 7:48 AM, Steve Underwood wrote:
Olivier wrote:
Linksys PAP2 or 3102 for instance
or Patton M-ATA
In fact, I would say most analog gateways with FXS port should also
support T.38
thoughts.
Brendan Martens
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
for interoperating with normal fax machines. I'm sure
something exists or the code wouldn't have been written into
asterisk... Can someone point me in the right direction?
Brendan Martens
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
of?
Brendan Martens
On Oct 22, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Jonn R Taylor wrote:
What version of *? Are you going all VOIP for your voice or are you
using a T1/E1? *?
1.4 has t38 pass-through and 1.6 has pass-through and termination,
but 1.6 was just release and I would not suggest using
I'm trying to get VoiceMailMain() to work properly, but it refuses. : (
I am using IMAP_STORAGE, which is functioning fine now... My
voicemail.conf user line:
6000 = 1234,Brendan's Mailbox,,,[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
imappassword=password
6000 = d,Brendan Martens
My voicemail extension
/asterisk/ChangeLog-1.6.0.1
Brendan Martens
On Oct 10, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Jim Duda wrote:
Does anyone know what this error message means?
Unable to create channel of type 'DAHDI' (cause 0 - Unknown)
I've upgraded to 1.6.0 with dahdi 2.0.
For some reason my outbound dahdi calls are not going
I see, Thank you for the clarification.
Brendan Martens
On Oct 10, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Brendan Martens wrote:
The reason for this is that 1.6.0 does not support dahdi. It was a
mistake when it was listed as an included feature. The documentation
for it has been removed
.
* configs/chan_dahdi.conf.sample: Remove mention of configuration
sections for defining channels in chan_dahdi.conf. This code
is in 1.6.1, and was not merged into 1.6.0.
Brendan Martens
On Oct 9, 2008, at 11:18 PM, sean darcy wrote:
In download dated 10/9.
Bug fix? Mistake?
sean
,
just noticed this and thought it may be applicable.
Brendan Martens
On Oct 9, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 08:12:46PM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
Good point.
I have a T100P that will not be seen by DAHDI for anything, but works
fabulously with Zaptel.
Which
Here, I've written a perl script that rewrites the actual sip.conf
itself (as well as generates a custom myexten.conf file, which is
included in the main extensions.conf file.)
I was hoping to keep it all native to asterisk, but I would be willing
to give that a try. Where can I get this
Jim Boykin wrote:
I know about those packages. Questions is how do we use those
packages
to build our own RPM. We use asterisk SVN trunk.
asterisk usually comes with asterisk.spec and make target rpm. With
some slight modifications on the spec file you can pretty much build
whatever
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
The answer you are looking for is that you should be using a
supported,
stable version, and right now, 1.4 is the only one that fits. If I
were
starting today, I'd go with 1.4.
1.6.0 has just been released.
Personally I'd start with
about this would be great.
Brendan Martens
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Thanks for the reply. Hmmm
1. I would provide Asterisk its own LDAP directory and synchronize
it with entreprise directory as I think it should be simpler to
synchronize 2 LDAP directories than coordinate Asterisk and Active
Directory evolutions.
This may work, but my end goal is
18 matches
Mail list logo
