[Asterisk-Users] Transferring calls - BUG0003710

2006-03-28 Thread Douglas Garstang
oks the Asterisk doesn't know about the call-id. Why not? Doug. > -Original Message- > From: Douglas Garstang > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:30 AM > To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' > Subject: NATted phones transferring calls

RE: [Asterisk-Users] NATted phones transferring calls - BUG0003710

2006-03-28 Thread Douglas Garstang
> -Original Message- > From: Alexander Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:04 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] NATted phones transferring calls - > BUG0003710 > > > I wont go into the details of

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Agents on DND still receiving calls...

2006-03-28 Thread Douglas Garstang
Do a trace with ngrep or ethereal and see if the phone is sending back a sip DECLINE or similar. If it is, I'd say you have an Asterisk bug. Doug. > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Kratzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:51 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.dig

[Asterisk-Users] NATted phones transferring calls - BUG0003710

2006-03-28 Thread Douglas Garstang
I made a call from 3254102 to 2944093. I then tried to do a transfer to 3254107. IP addresses have been changed to protect the innocent. It appears this related to bug 3710. It's unclear from the bug if the problem has been fixed or not. If it hasn't, then this seems pretty serious and would I

[Asterisk-Users] BUG 0003710 - RE: Transfer Calls - REFER

2006-03-27 Thread Douglas Garstang
I just realised my problem seems to be related to bug 0003710 - "0003710: [patch] Consultative transfers between asterisk servers". It's unclear from the bug info if this problem has been resolved yet. Anyone know? Doug. > -Original Message----- > From: Douglas Gar

[Asterisk-Users] Transfer Calls - REFER

2006-03-27 Thread Douglas Garstang
I made a call from 3254102 to 2944093. I then tried to do a transfer to 3254107. IP addresses have been changed to protect the innocent. Here's the REFER that the phone at 2944093 sends directly to Asterisk: U 216.186.128.68:5060 -> 216.186.142.203:5060 REFER sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0. Via:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Config File Management

2006-03-27 Thread Douglas Garstang
How does Fast AGI help? -Original Message-From: Giovanni Miano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 1:00 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Config File ManagementYou can use FastAGISee http://www.ast

[Asterisk-Users] Background() App From AGI

2006-03-27 Thread Douglas Garstang
I have the following python AGI script. I know it's been abstracted, but it's still pretty easy to see what's happening. self.agi.channelAnswer() self.agi.wait(1) self.agi.execCmd("background","enter-conf-call-number","") self.agi.execCmd("Read","confNum|||","")

[Asterisk-Users] Config File Management

2006-03-27 Thread Douglas Garstang
I'm curious (ok, well I admit it - it's for perosnal gain) what methods people are using to manage asterisk config files when they have multiple asterisk systems? Some sort of revision control such as cvs,rcs or subversion? A central 'config server' where you edit the files and then rsync them

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP 301 is slow

2006-03-26 Thread Douglas Garstang
Easy to configure, lots of options and features, excellent quality speaker for hands free. Although the 301 is nothing to get excited about. The 501 and 601 are much better. Doug. -Original Message- From: Nick Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 3/26/20

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Copying SIP Subscriptions

2006-03-26 Thread Douglas Garstang
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Copying SIP Subscriptions On 3/26/06, Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm pretty sure I already know the answer to this, bu

[Asterisk-Users] Copying SIP Subscriptions

2006-03-25 Thread Douglas Garstang
I'm pretty sure I already know the answer to this, but... Is there a way to copy/transfer/replicate sip subscriptions from one asterisk system to another, for the purposes of HA? You coudln't even write a script to do it I don't think. You can do an 'asterisk -rx sip show subscriptions' but th

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: IAX Incoming/Outgoing

2006-03-25 Thread Douglas Garstang
know the username so it knows what entry in > iax.conf to use for that information, such as the key to use. > > Joshua Colp > > - Original Message - > From: Douglas Garstang > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - > Non-Commercial Discu

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: IAX Incoming/Outgoing

2006-03-25 Thread Douglas Garstang
Well, actually I did... sort of... I picked a random post and hit reply as I normally do. I forgot to clear the old text, but it's obvious that in no way it detracted from the other person's post, and the use of the word 'hijack' is highly dubious..   Doug. -Original Message-From:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: IAX Incoming/Outgoing

2006-03-25 Thread Douglas Garstang
gt; IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Joshua Colp > > - Original Message - > From: Douglas Garstang > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - > Non-Commercial Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: > Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:55:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: IAX Incoming/Outgoing

2006-03-25 Thread Douglas Garstang
- Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: IAX Incoming/Outgoing > > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > This is INSANE! My calling system has this iax.conf: > > > > Search the archives for mails about separating > originations/terminations > by re

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: IAX Incoming/Outgoing

2006-03-25 Thread Douglas Garstang
o send a username of PBX3???     -Original Message-----From: Douglas Garstang Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 11:16 AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: IAX Incoming/Outgoing Well, right now I have this on box1:   [p

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: IAX Incoming/Outgoing

2006-03-25 Thread Douglas Garstang
Actually, I commented out [pbx3] on the caller, and the callee is STILL seeing pbx3 as the username. That's even more bizarre. I am sendng pbx1 as the key from the pbx1 system, and pbx2 is matching it against pbx3??? Huh??? -Original Message-From: Douglas Garstang

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: IAX Incoming/Outgoing

2006-03-25 Thread Douglas Garstang
.   From: Douglas Garstang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 12:37 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: [Asterisk-Users] RE: IAX Incoming/Outgoing   12 hours later... still playing with this. Anyone got any

[Asterisk-Users] RE: IAX Incoming/Outgoing

2006-03-25 Thread Douglas Garstang
12 hours later... still playing with this. Anyone got any ideas?   Doug. -Original Message-From: Douglas Garstang Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:53 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial

[Asterisk-Users] IAX Incoming/Outgoing

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
I'vce got three Asterisk systems here that I'd like to be able to place calls between with IAX. As usual, I've spent several hours playing with it, really getting nowhere. Asterisk is so mentally draining. Each system, pbx1, pbx2, pbx3, should be able to connect to every other. Do I need separat

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Transferring a call with IAX

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
cution at the current > extension if the > destination channel hangs up. > > Aaron > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > I just changed the macro to: > > > > exten => s,1,Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],25,wW) > >

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Transferring a call with IAX

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
extension > that handles a different DIALSTATUS than ANSWER to cover good calls. > > Aaron > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > Nope. Still no go. > > > > Caller has this: > >-- Hungup 'IAX2/acdserver1-2' > > == S

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Transferring a call with IAX

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
ted non-zero on 'SIP/2944093-9ef2' in macro 'DialIAX' == Spawn extension (macro-DialIAX, s, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/2944093-9ef2' > -Original Message- > From: Douglas Garstang > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 4:50 PM > To: 'Asterisk Users Mail

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Transferring a call with IAX

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
> > > Why do you have s-ANSWER jumping to s-OK? Try putting a NoOp > in s-ANSWER > and see if it's making it there... Also, when the call > doesn't make it > through, does it jump through the s-DIALSTATUS priorities? > > Aaron > > On Fri, 24 Mar

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Transferring a call with IAX

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
> > > Looking at your macro, I don't have any MacroExits in mine. > I use AEL, > and it doesn't put that on the macros. Try changing your > MacroExit to a > NoOp(Macro Finished) and see if that drops you back into the > original call > structure. >

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Transferring a call with IAX

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
ing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Transferring a call with IAX > > > Hmm... and nothing in the macro after the dial command is > being executed? > What does the CLI say on the caller server when the ACD server is > finished? > > A

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Transferring a call with IAX

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
> Change priority 4 on the ACD server to a Hangup and ignore > what I said > before about putting in priority 5. Put the macro call you > had on the ACD > server on the PBX server, and that should fix your problem. > Since you're > having the ACD server do a macro of

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Transferring a call with IAX

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
e" server, and then from there to another server for > voicemail? > > Aaron > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > Thanks Aaron, but nope... that didn't do it. I put an > explicit hangup right after the Queue app on the ACD server, > and I see thi

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Transferring a call with IAX

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
isn't hanging > up the line > when it runs out of the queue. Add this, and it should work for you: > > exten => oe_custcare,5,Hangup > > Let me know if that works :) > > Aaron > > P.S. It's the same on both servers, just the server names are > swit

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Failover without SER

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
I'm just starting testing on, but works like > a charm with > the Cisco's. This gives us the redundancy we need with the > system, and > hopefully the Polycoms handle it well. > > Aaron > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > Don&#

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Transferring a call with IAX

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
t; original server continues in it's own call pattern until it > hangs up or > the user hangs up. This way, whatever server the call comes > from handles > all call control except the actual conversation when needed. > > Aaron > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Douglas Gars

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Failover without SER

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
in, I'm kinda excited to see how well they > handle the > redundancy. The way we have it set up, we can drop a whole > new server > into the cluster, change like 3 lines of dialplan code, and > add the server > to the proxy list and voila, another server handling more

[Asterisk-Users] Transferring a call with IAX

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
Here's an interesting question: If I transfer a call from Asterisk system to another with IAX, is there any way I can get control back on the original system? Or.. do I lose control, and the dialplan has to continue on the new system? Scenario is we transfer calls to an Asterisk system that han

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Failover without SER

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
Here's the $64,000 question... how are you handling redundant registrations? > -Original Message- > From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 11:32 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fa

[Asterisk-Users] Realtime Agents

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
In short, does this work yet? ie putting agents into Realtime. Can't find any info on it... Thanks, Doug. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.dig

[Asterisk-Users] Maximum Queue Name Length

2006-03-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
Do queue names have a max length? I have a queue named 'oneeighty_techsupp' in queues.conf, and a 'show queues' returns a truncated queue name. Is that just a display bug, or do queues names have a max length of 12? demeter*CLI> show queues oneeighty_te has 0 calls (max unlimited) in 'rrmemory'

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Tearing my hair out with Queues

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
ueues Let's try the obvious first, how about exten => q_main,1,Answer exten => q_main,2,etc. Fingers crossed :) On 3/24/06, Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here you go

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Tearing my hair out with Queues

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
I have found, however that not using the agent time-out is bad because the queue continues to send a caller to the same agent, even though that agent isn't at his/her desk to answer the call. Automatically logging that agent out allows the call to be passed to the nex

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Tearing my hair out with Queues

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
Here you go. I'm not sure this is much use. It's a bit hard to explain as I have one system calling another via IAX where the Queue() command is executed... Calls are VOIP->VOIP, on our network... This case below is where each agent (there's 6) is rung for 30sec, but the Queue aborts after 120s,

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
If you referring to me Aaron, I don't recollect every using the word 'stupid'. I have said many times that the way certain things are done for an Enterprise Class piece of software are unacceptable, or maybe reacted in incredulation that it would even be considered being done in a certain way.

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
erisk. Hell, some of us have even helped out a little >with the development. Which rude remarks towards developers are you specifically referring to? I don't seem to recollect any. I have actually received a number of personal emails from people who completely understand where I am coming from and

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Tearing my hair out with Queues

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
I don't see why I'd be getting CHANUNAVAIL. As I said, all the agents are logged in and are in astdb and 'sip show peers'. I just had another go, I passed a timeout of 300 to the Queue() command and set timeout=30 in queues.conf for the queue. The Queue timed out after TWO minutes (120s) and o

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Tearing my hair out with Queues

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
Thanks, but I don't really follow your reply. Agents are being logged in with AgentCallBacklogin. If I do a 'show agents' command, I see them... all nice and logged into their queues... -Original Message- From: CC Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/23/200

[Asterisk-Users] What do the Queue timeouts really mean?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
Rather than continue to go in circles with queues, I'll ask upfront. What exactly does the timeout option in queues.conf specify? The docs contradict themselves on the meaning. What exactly does the timeout option passed to Queue()? Docs are flaky there also. I have a BIZARRE situation where I'

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Tearing my hair out with Queues

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
ain,1,Queue(oneeighty_main300) ... [oneeighty_main] musiconhold = default timeout = 15 ... Cheers. On 3/24/06, Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Egads. Getti

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
ork because of this :(. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: BJ Weschke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 2:00 PM > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Fw: anyb

[Asterisk-Users] Tearing my hair out with Queues

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
Egads. Getting queues to work is like pulling teeth. extensions.conf: exten => q_main,1,Queue(oneeighty_main1) exten => 80014055,1,Dial(SIP/80014018,15,tr) exten => 80014057,1,Dial(SIP/80014018,15,tr) exten => 80014052,1,Dial(SIP/80014018,15,tr) queues.conf: [oneeighty_main] musiconhold = def

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
it clears the settings on a single phone, > leaving all > the others untouched. We do it all the time when we > reconfigure a phone. > > Aaron :) > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > Ok Andrew. Here's one for you... I just changed qua

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Subscription state after reload (New subject)

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
How can a reload clear registrations? If I 'reload' without using realtime, I keep my sip peers (as well as astdb). I can still contact other phones... registration info is still there. If I `reload` with realtime, I lose my sip peers (but astdb remains). I can _STILL_ contact other phones

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Subscription state after reload (New subject)

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
*lol* I think he was referring to a ASTERISK reboot, not a phone reboot. > -Original Message- > From: Olle E Johansson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 1:15 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Subsc

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
I also just changed the callerid column for a use in realtime. Doing a 'realtime load sippeers name 80014052' shows the OLD value for callerid. Do I have to do a reload here? If I do, I'll lose all my sip peer information - BAD! > -Original Message----- > From: Dou

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Ok... what is 'sip show peers' really used for?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
e E Johansson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:57 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Ok... what is 'sip show peers' > really used > for? > > > > 23 mar 2006 kl. 19.16 skre

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Ok... what is 'sip show peers' really used for?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
My bad. Ignore this reply. > -Original Message- > From: Douglas Garstang > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 12:12 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Ok... what is 'sip show peers' > really used &

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
I _think_ you can do a 'sip reload' instead of a 'reload' and keep your BLF... But as for a server boot don't be crazy! According to people on this group, that's just plain never required in the real world. > -Original Message- > From: mustardman29 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: T

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
lsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:46 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ? > > > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 11:34, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > First thing that com

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Ok... what is 'sip show peers' really used for?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
for? > > > > 23 mar 2006 kl. 19.16 skrev Douglas Garstang: > > > I'd love to understand what the function of the peer list returned > > by 'sip show peers' is for, especially when Realtime is used. > > > > If I start Asterisk with realtim

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Ok... what is 'sip show peers' really used for?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
s you > what IP address Asterisk knows for a peer, as well as the qualify > status. > > On 3/23/06, Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd love to understand what the function of the peer list > returned by 'sip show peers' is for, especially

[Asterisk-Users] Ok... what is 'sip show peers' really used for?

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
I'd love to understand what the function of the peer list returned by 'sip show peers' is for, especially when Realtime is used. If I start Asterisk with realtime enabled, a 'sip show peers' yields none. As each peer (phone) registers, or a call is made to the peer, Asterisk adds them to the l

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime Query

2006-03-23 Thread Douglas Garstang
gt; > What does your dialplan look like? > > On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > Arrgh. > > > > I just made a call with Asterisk to extension 2944093. That > extension exists in astdb and I have rtcachefriends=yes in > sip.conf. Asterisk di

RE: [Asterisk-Users] polycom queue bug

2006-03-22 Thread Douglas Garstang
Sounds like an implementation bug. I have not seen this issue with Polycom 601 phones and Asterisk queues. I'd suggest you get ngrep or tethereal and run it on your Asterisk system (port 5060) to see who's sending what to where. Doug -Original Message- From: [EMAIL P

[Asterisk-Users] Realtime Query

2006-03-22 Thread Douglas Garstang
Arrgh. I just made a call with Asterisk to extension 2944093. That extension exists in astdb and I have rtcachefriends=yes in sip.conf. Asterisk did a database query... SELECT * FROM ast_sip_users WHERE name = '2944093' Uhm... Why? Doug ___ --Bandwi

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ?

2006-03-22 Thread Douglas Garstang
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:55 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ? > > > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 18:12

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime / SIP Peers etc

2006-03-22 Thread Douglas Garstang
> -Original Message- > From: Olle E Johansson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:41 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime / SIP Peers etc > > > > 22 mar 2006 kl. 15.02 skrev Andrew Kohlsmith:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Programming the Manager API

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
risk-Users] Programming the Manager API Douglas Garstang wrote: > Yikes. Java. Yuck. I'll stick with Python... Thanks anyway. > I just worked it out... you can supply an actionid to the request to know what reply to look for, although it will stil

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Programming the Manager API

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 3/21/2006 10:05 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Programming the Manager API Douglas Garstang wrote: > I just started poking aro

[Asterisk-Users] Programming the Manager API

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
I just started poking around with writing a python module to interface to the Manager API, and it suddenly hit me... how the heck are you supposed to program this thing? All the events seem to be dumped to all the open connections. If I send a command, such as a login, there seems to me to be

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: VoiceMailMain(@context) Problem with Option 5(Advanced)

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
I've got 1.2.5... -Original Message- From: JR Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 3/21/2006 8:19 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Cc: Subject: [Asterisk-Users] RE: VoiceMailMain(@context) Problem with Option 5(Advanced)

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ?

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
a given. Doug. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 5:04 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ? > > > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 18:1

[Asterisk-Users] 'Click to Dial'

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
Oooo I think I am gonna poo my pants. Using the microbrowser on a Polycom 601, I was able to get it to execute a cgi script upon selection of an item. The cgi script used Net::Telnet connect to the manager interface on another Asterisk system, call the user back at their phone and then bridge t

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ?

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
I had to drop realtime with sip users. If you do a reload or a restart, you lose all the sip peer information (even with rtcachefriends=yes). That just wasn't acceptable for us. > -Original Message- > From: JR Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 4:06 PM

RE: [Asterisk-Users] VoiceMailMain(@context) Problem with Option 5(Advanced)

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
I had the same problem yesterday. I thought it might have been a realtime problem. Guess not. Bloody annoying too. > -Original Message- > From: JR Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 2:52 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [Asterisk-Users]

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Native MOH - Convert mp3 to ulaw

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
- Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Native MOH - Convert mp3 to ulaw > > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > I tried that earlier today... found it somewhere online... > This is what I get... > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mp3]# sox -V fpm-calm-river.m

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Native MOH - Convert mp3 to ulaw

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
Convert mp3 to ulaw > > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > Tried it. It doesn't seem to like converting to ulaw, > unless I'm doing something wrong. The man page mentions ulaw > briefly, but doesn't say HOW to convert to it. > > > > Doug. > > &

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Native MOH - Convert mp3 to ulaw

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
> Bob McDowell > > > -Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas > Garstang > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:03 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: [Asterisk-Users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime SIP Persistency

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
I have rtcachefriends=yes in sip.conf. It is caching friends because as I said in my post, astdb has all the contacts, ie they're cached. It's the behaviour of 'sip show peers' that's not working. > -Original Message- > From: David Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 2

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime SIP Persistency

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
ercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime SIP Persistency > > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > I've been using realtime for sip users information. > > > > I noticed that when you are doing this, if you do a > 'reload' or restart asterisk, t

[Asterisk-Users] Realtime SIP Persistency

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
I've been using realtime for sip users information. I noticed that when you are doing this, if you do a 'reload' or restart asterisk, the information in a 'sip show peers' goes away. When I do this, MWI stops working. I always though MWI used the astdb file ('database show') to determine where

[Asterisk-Users] Realtime / SIP Peers etc

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
Ready to scream here..   1. After 6 months with Asterisk I'm STILL trying to understand the difference between a SIP user, friend and peer. 2. Exactly what resource does Asterisk use to send MWI to registered phones? I thought it was astdb? 3. It looks like it isn't astdb. It looks like i

[Asterisk-Users] Native MOH - Convert mp3 to ulaw

2006-03-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
I'd like to use native moh instead of with mpg123... for some reason the processes never bloody die. For native moh to not spawn an external player, I'd need to convert the default supplied moh sound files in /var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3 to ulaw and g729 format. Anyone know of a free, easy way to c

[Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Bug?

2006-03-19 Thread Douglas Garstang
Ugh. I have voicemail set up for realtime... mysql> SELECT * FROM ast_vm_users; +--+-+---+-+--+--+---+---+-+ | uniqueid | customer_id | context | mailbox | passwo

[Asterisk-Users] Annoying Asterisk Realtime Limitation

2006-03-19 Thread Douglas Garstang
Well, this is a major pain in the ass. I got realtime static working for sip.conf. 'Great!' I thought. That was until I realised I couldn't use it. Our Asterisk systems are using OSPF and listen on interface lo:1. Asterisk doesn't like to use an interface name for it's bindaddr setting, so you

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Feedback from VON expo! Info on * HA andPolycomphone!!

2006-03-18 Thread Douglas Garstang
undant. Aaron On Mar 16, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Douglas Garstang wrote: > I know someone who's at VON this week. Apparently Mark Spencer was > up there talking about how Asterisk supports SRV. Sounds like > vaporware to me

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime SIP users/peers - Screwed?

2006-03-18 Thread Douglas Garstang
come from? Will this even work? Would I be so frustrated if this stuff was documented somewhere? > -----Original Message- > From: Douglas Garstang > Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:55 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: [Asterisk-Users

[Asterisk-Users] Realtime SIP users/peers

2006-03-18 Thread Douglas Garstang
Just spent hours dicking around with SIP Realtime. Every time a phone came up and sent a registration to Asterisk, Asterisk would simply NOT query the database. I had sipusers in extconfig, but added sippeers as well. NOW I can see Asterisk doing a 'SELECT * FROM sippeers WHERE name = '2944093'

RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Realtime Users

2006-03-18 Thread Douglas Garstang
at 3/18/2006 6:49 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Realtime Users Douglas Garstang wrote: > Trying to get SIP realtime working here... > >

[Asterisk-Users] SIP Realtime Users

2006-03-17 Thread Douglas Garstang
Trying to get SIP realtime working here... I'm connected to the database... *CLI> realtime mysql status Connected to [EMAIL PROTECTED], port 3306 with username voxadmin for 6 seconds. I can get information for the extension in question... *CLI> realtime load sipusers name 2944093

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: regexten

2006-03-17 Thread Douglas Garstang
? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Douglas Garstang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:13 PM > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: regexten > >

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: regexten

2006-03-17 Thread Douglas Garstang
The polycom doesn't need to re-register... it's already registered on all three Asterisk systems. :) > -Original Message- > From: Gabriel Afana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:04 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [As

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: regexten

2006-03-17 Thread Douglas Garstang
> > - Original Message - > From: "Tony Mountifield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 1:04 AM > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: regexten > > > > In article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PRO

[Asterisk-Users] Extra Debugging without console

2006-03-17 Thread Douglas Garstang
Does anyone know how I can run asterisk in the background WITH extra debugging (ie the -d option) without the console popping up? Try it... Run 'asterisk -d' and you'll get the console. Huh? Maybe it doesn't make sense to run in the background with debugging turned up, but I want to see the extr

[Asterisk-Users] Sticky Problem SER/Asterisk

2006-03-17 Thread Douglas Garstang
Trying to find a solution to a sticky problem here. We have 3 OpenSER systems. Phones register with the OpenSER systems, and after they authenticate the user, pass the registration info using OpenSER's send() command to all Asterisk boxes sitting behind them. Each asterisk system then knows abo

RE: [Asterisk-Users] regexten

2006-03-16 Thread Douglas Garstang
le work. Doug. -Original Message- From: Peter Bowyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/16/2006 11:37 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] regexten On 17

RE: [Asterisk-Users] regexten

2006-03-16 Thread Douglas Garstang
Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] regexten On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 04:41:42PM -0700, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Feedback from VON expo! Info on * HA andPolycomphone!!

2006-03-16 Thread Douglas Garstang
n Cc: Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Feedback from VON expo! Info on * HA andPolycomphone!! On 17/03/06, Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David, > > How's DUNDi make this redundant? The way I unde

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Feedback from VON expo!Infoon*HAandPolycomphone!!

2006-03-16 Thread Douglas Garstang
Gabe, I'm the guy with the three SER boxes. All three SER boxes are active. Polycom phones point to a DNS domain with SRV lookups for all outbound requests. The SRV queries return the three SER boxes. The three boxes authenticate a user and then store the user in it's 'location' database befor

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Feedback from VON expo! Infoon*HAandPolycomphone!!

2006-03-16 Thread Douglas Garstang
Grrr. I'm using outlook web access and there's no way to do inline replies. Anyway... Gabriel. Using SER does not create a single point of failure. You install three SER boxes. Single point of failure gone. It does not take several seconds. If your phones are configured for SRV, and 2/3 of y

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Feedback from VON expo! Info on * HA and Polycomphone!!

2006-03-16 Thread Douglas Garstang
David, How's DUNDi make this redundant? The way I understand it, a phone is only ever registered to a single Asterisk box at a time. If that Asterisk box where to fail, callers lose the ability to contact users that where registered on that box. -Original Message- Fro

RE: [Asterisk-Users] regexten

2006-03-16 Thread Douglas Garstang
ing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] regexten On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Douglas Garstang wrote: > Thanks for the reply, but still no luck. > > sip.conf: > [294409

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Feedback from VON expo! Info on * HA and Polycomphone!!

2006-03-16 Thread Douglas Garstang
I spent some time today working on HA option number 1. I don't know if I'd really call it HA, given that the phones need to have a high registration frequency to get around a server failing. How often do you have the phones re-register? Once a minute? Imagine that multiplied by thousands of phon

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >