On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Joao Pereira wrote:
But still, the user can choose not to answer the phone.
I want to force the users to accept the calls.
Wouldn't that be the same as paging/intercom, then?
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Paging+and+Intercom
Anyone?
On Aug 24, 2007, at 3:35 PM, Ed Pastore wrote:
I understand this question is over-broad, but hopefully you can have
patience with a newbie and toss me a bone...
I am in the testing stage of deploying Asterisk. I have successfully
configured it to work behind the NAT of my ZyXEL
I understand this question is over-broad, but hopefully you can have
patience with a newbie and toss me a bone...
I am in the testing stage of deploying Asterisk. I have successfully
configured it to work behind the NAT of my ZyXEL ZyWALL 35 firewall.
However, I think there is a lot of
Hi, folks.
I've been on the Asterisk Announce list for a while now, and it seems
to me that the release versions of Asterisk are a bit bleeding-edge.
They qualify as stable, but I wouldn't call them production stable
since half the time a new one comes out, a fix for it comes out the
next
D'oh... now I see it on the end. BYOD-Lite is still $5.95.
Never mnd.
Sorry. :)
On Jul 22, 2005, at 12:47 PM, Ed Pastore wrote:
Hi. As recommended by this list, I am setting up [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
order to start learning what I need to learn in order to start
learning how
Hi. As recommended by this list, I am setting up [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
order to start learning what I need to learn in order to start
learning how to learn how to learn Asterisk, VOIP, telephony, etc..
Or something like that. :)
I am following the wonderful instructions on:
Hi folks. Thanks for having patience with a newbie...
I am going through the setup exercise at
http://chayden.net/Asterisk/SeUpAsteriskAtHome.htm
I am trying to do it all on BroadVoice since this is just
experimental, and the 100 minutes of outgoing from them should be
enough for now. So I
On Jul 14, 2005, at 11:20 PM, Time Bandit wrote:
Is the problem that the technology isn't mature, that the load on the
computer is too high, or simply that it doesn't work well in a poorly
designed network?
YMMV. I like the portability of a softphone, but sound may jitter
because of other
Thanks for all the great help! I finally feel a little grounded when
thinking about this stuff... at least enough to put a ballpark figure
on my budget, anyway.
But as I think about it a little more, one huge question appears to
me... do I need to massively expand my network?
I had
On Jul 14, 2005, at 11:54 AM, Adam Goryachev wrote:
Use a phone like the polycom IP301/501/600 which has a built-in 2 port
10/100 switch. ie, take the existing cable and plug it into the phone,
then take a second cable, connect one end to the phone, and the
other to
your PC. No need for any
Hi again, folks. I've been getting feedback from this list and
elsewhere that softphones are generally not considered good enough
for hardcore business use. Can someone point me to where I can find
more detail on this debate?
Is the problem that the technology isn't mature, that the load
Thanks for all the great replies. I guess I over-asked my question
(since so many kept popping up).
For now, what I really need to determine is what I need to budget for
a full implementation. Unfortunately, I don't have time now to do
testing and analysis... I just need to get my budget
Thanks, that's great stuff, Wiley.
On Jul 13, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Wiley Siler wrote:
How many users are being supported again?
About 50 users or fewer. But I suppose there are some more lines
lying around for conference rooms and such. Right now, I think we
have 20 POTS lines on our
Hi, folks. I am planning on implementing Asterisk in 2006, and need
to budget for it now, so I need to know what I'll need to get. My
company has about 50 users, and is currently languishing on a very
old Comdial PBX. All of our client computers are Macs; our servers
are mostly OS X, with
14 matches
Mail list logo
