Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with Portech MV-372

2009-11-26 Thread Ex Vito
I've seen that behaviour on he MV-374. One possible solution (workaround) is to prevent the gateway from registering itself and to declare each of the channels explicitly in sip.conf via its associated IP + port. -- exvito ___ -- Bandwidth and

Re: [asterisk-users] Agent with External Number as Extension

2009-11-26 Thread Ex Vito
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Shaun Clark shaun_cl...@hotmail.com wrote: Can you add an agent dynamically to a queue with an external number, i.e. cell phone as an extension? If so how? Thanks! Maybe adding the channel Local/PSTN-number@context-that-dials-PSTN to the queue as a member

Re: [asterisk-users] Problems with dahdi on asterisk 1.6.1.9 with TE122

2009-11-17 Thread Ex Vito
Oliver, Without any experience with Asterisk 1.6.1.x here it goes: - Is your signalling=pri_net correct or should it be pri_cpe ? - I'm having myself some issues with DAHDI 2.2.0.2 + TE121 which, I reckon, is equal to your TE122 apart from the bus interface (PCIe vs PCI) -- see the

Re: [asterisk-users] TE121 - Idle system load at ~0.3 - Bad DAHDI 2.2.0.2 behaviour ?!

2009-11-16 Thread Ex Vito
Shaun, Thanks for your feedback. See my inline comments. On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote: It appears there may be a regression in dahdi-linux 2.2.0 with regards to the wcte12xp driver and the VPMADT032 module (as discussed

Re: [asterisk-users] BLF with SPA941?

2009-11-12 Thread Ex Vito
Although I've never tested such feature on those devices, I know that it was only enabled in a recent firmware (6.1.3a/6.1.5a ?). Are you running it ? -- exvito ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

[asterisk-users] TE121 - Idle system load at ~0.3 - Bad DAHDI 2.2.0.2 behaviour ?!

2009-11-11 Thread Ex Vito
Hi Asterisk Users, We've been experiencing some tough time regarding a new Asterisk installation connected to the PSTN via an ISDN PRI with a Digium TE121 with the optional VPMADT032 echo cancellation module. For now, I'll focus on something very specific which is summarized on this

Re: [asterisk-users] callfile to auto-answering extension

2009-09-27 Thread Ex Vito
2009/9/27 Leif Neland le...@neland.dk: Can I, via a callfile, or command-line parameters to Asterisk start a dialplan-script? eg asterisk -someflag execute callalert then in dialplan [callalert] exten = s,1,SIPAddHeader(Call-Info:\;answer-after=0) exten = s,2,dial(SIP/36) exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] Know for how long an agent is talking?

2009-09-27 Thread Ex Vito
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Gabriel Ortiz Lour ortiz.ad...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,   Is there a way to know for how long an agent is talking on the queue call?   (without keeping a timer myself... just asking asterisk) Identify the channel at the CLI and then get its details via core

Re: [asterisk-users] Where are phone registrations kept?

2009-09-27 Thread Ex Vito
I've been willing to give such a solution a try but the lack of time has prevented it to date... Are you using realtime for your SIP peers/users ? Would the failover behaviour improve under such scenario ? (just a thought) -- exvito ___ --

Re: [asterisk-users] SUN and PRI ?

2009-09-06 Thread Ex Vito
The system specs mention PCIe expansion slots, so your only option is the TE420B. -- exvito ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now:

Re: [asterisk-users] Local music on hold -- mohinterpret=passthrough assymetrical ?

2009-04-05 Thread Ex Vito
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Richard Brady rnbr...@gmail.com wrote: Exvito Did you ever make any progress on this? ...no, sorry. Never got to the perfect solution. (and in all due honesty, I can't recall the exact setup we ended up deploying) -- exvito

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk -f and restart now

2009-02-24 Thread Ex Vito
# rasterisk Connected to Asterisk 1.4.23 currently running on debian (pid = 17191) samuel*CLI restart now samuel*CLI Disconnected from Asterisk server Executing last minute cleanups Asterisk ending (0). # rasterisk Connected to Asterisk SVN-branch-1.4-r178373 currently running on debian

Re: [asterisk-users] call file bug?

2009-02-17 Thread Ex Vito
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ray Chen ray1...@techie.com wrote: I have a problem of using call file to make an auto dial out call through FXO channel. I defined the channel in the call file as Channel: DAHDI/1/8775203463 When I put the call file under the /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing dir

Re: [asterisk-users] Contact lookup

2009-02-05 Thread Ex Vito
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Geoff Lane ge...@gjctech.co.uk wrote: The nice thing about that is that if I use MySQL I can run the management application on another machine, and so don't need to run a web server on the Asterisk box. However, I wonder whether the overhead necessary to run

Re: [asterisk-users] Incoming fax detection on mISDN hfcmulti B410P card

2009-02-05 Thread Ex Vito
App nvfaxdetect() works fine for that purpose on both Zap and mISDN. See http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-NVFaxDetect -- exvito ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or

Re: [asterisk-users] early dial: asterisk and ATA

2009-02-04 Thread Ex Vito
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Vieri rentor...@yahoo.com wrote: I did but apparently, there's nothing in the guides that lets me do this. It's something about supporting 484 responses that Grandstream GXW4008 seems to do and Linksys SPA8000 doesn't (or at least it's not documented). In

Re: [asterisk-users] question on originate call

2009-02-04 Thread Ex Vito
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote: Seems like the first call to Channel is being MADE successfully. Then it goes to do Context and Exten: I get failed... [smvoice-dialout] exten = smvoice_single_mediaport,1,agi(smvoice) exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] Contact lookup

2009-02-04 Thread Ex Vito
For a simple (but flexible) case I would consider ODBC + func_odbc. Here is the idea (in case you aren't aware of how it goes...) - Make a DB available (your choice as long as it is accessible via ODBC) - Create table in it with your contacts (say columns number and name, maybe more) -

Re: [asterisk-users] siemens hipath 4000

2009-02-04 Thread Ex Vito
Any suggestions? Jerry Are you sure asterisk is to behave as signalling=pri_cpe or should it be pri_net ? -- exvito ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or

Re: [asterisk-users] Music On Hold

2009-02-02 Thread Ex Vito
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Idris AVCI idris.a...@vodatech.com.tr wrote: In my situation AMI is not an option. When somebdy puts a call on hold, on asterisk console I can see messages like Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/ and Started music on hold, class 'default',

Re: [asterisk-users] Which policy for ISDN BRI support in NT/PtMP ?

2009-02-02 Thread Ex Vito
(my 2c, Portugal Based) - Most really small installations are PtMP (that's the default you get when ordering a BRI) - You also get 3 MSNs and an NT. - You can order a TA instead of the NT. - You can order PTP + optional DDIs in blocks of 10, but you need to be explicit. - Larger

Re: [asterisk-users] dialstatus through a call file

2009-02-02 Thread Ex Vito
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Pascal Bruno tipas...@gmail.com wrote: Is it possible to retrieve the DIALSTATUS variable when placing call through a call file. This variable is set when using the Dial() application from the dialplan, but I am using a call file for my current application and

Re: [asterisk-users] Music On Hold

2009-02-01 Thread Ex Vito
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: The dialplan AFAIK doesn't cover HOLD handling. If you can spare the overhead, you can make a daemon to watch hints and run a script whenever the hint for a line goes to hold and changes from hold to inuse. Just run

Re: [asterisk-users] early dial: asterisk and ATA

2009-02-01 Thread Ex Vito
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Vieri rentor...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm trying to do the same in the SPA8000 units but without any luck. If anyone is doing something similar with this device then I'd appreciate it if you could share your relevant config options (dial pattern, etc.). Not

Re: [asterisk-users] Managing codecs

2009-02-01 Thread Ex Vito
Assuming you are using SIP phones and IIRC, you can hint at the codec to be used by setting the SIP_CODEC variable in the dialplan; before Dial()'ing, of course ! :-) I think this is still an area where asterisk needs improvement... Dynamic codec (re) negotiation. Anyone care to correct

Re: [asterisk-users] Using centos and kickstart to build a minimum installation

2009-01-25 Thread Ex Vito
Anyone done anything similar before that would care to share ? Here is a snippet of our standard ks file for automated installs: %packages --nobase @core sendmail sendmail-cf ntp vixie-cron crontabs at logrotate telnet bind-utils lsof wget which unzip man bc nc sharutils # Up till now, just

Re: [asterisk-users] mISDN BRI Asterisk 1.4

2009-01-13 Thread Ex Vito
While I don't know the OpenVOX B200P specifics, some interface cards need you to change physical jumpers in order to acheive NT vs TE, mode. Could that be the case ? -- exvito ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] Bad Audio : linux-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686 / asterisk-1.2.27 / zaptel-1.2.24 / libpri-1.2.5 / HP ML110 G5

2009-01-05 Thread Ex Vito
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Nick Wolf new...@gmail.com wrote: besides this, I paste my zaptel.conf : span=1,1,6,ccs,hdb3 span=2,1,6,ccs,hdb3 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 bchan=32-46,48-62 dchan=47 loadzone=fr defaultzone=fr when I put 6 in LINE BUILD OUT (1,1,6,ccs,hdb3) value I got

Re: [asterisk-users] queue log parser

2009-01-05 Thread Ex Vito
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:12 PM, David fire ddf...@gmail.com wrote: if you don't know any parser maybe you can send me a link or a pdf whit info on how to parse the log. ...check queuelog.txt under the doc/ directory on the asterisk source distribution (apparently, under 1.6 it is

Re: [asterisk-users] Bad Audio : linux-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686 / asterisk-1.2.27 / zaptel-1.2.24 / libpri-1.2.5 / HP ML110 G5

2009-01-04 Thread Ex Vito
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Nick Wolf new...@gmail.com wrote: I forgot to describe the audio problem, well, I experience micro cuts in the voice, this does not happen during the whole call, it happens during 2 seconds then audio becomes normal, then back again 2 or 3 seconds then goes

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX2 softphones keep ringing....

2008-12-20 Thread Ex Vito
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Jerome Deyle jde...@gmail.com wrote: Running AsteriskNow, with FreePBX front end. Have two users who use softphones on notebooks in the field. Problem is that if the softphone receives a call, but the user is not available to pick it up, Asterisk will send the

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.22 vs 1.4.21.2 - IAX2 regression ?

2008-11-04 Thread Ex Vito
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Igor Zamocky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13645 Thanks Igor, we'll keep an eye on it. -- exvito ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

[asterisk-users] 1.4.22 vs 1.4.21.2 - IAX2 regression ?

2008-10-30 Thread Ex Vito
Hi list, I just experienced an odd behaviour in 1.4.22 vs 1.4.21.2. To cut a long story short, IAX2 is not tx-ing hangup... Scenario is composed of two asterisk systems A and B. A receives calls from IAX users X, Y, Z, etc, does some validation and forwards them to B, also over IAX. When B

Re: [asterisk-users] Decent Voip Phones for enterprise

2008-10-28 Thread Ex Vito
...as others have mentioned, yes they do have the ability to be centrally managed, provisioned, configured. Also, from the latest firmware, 6.x.x: - Ability to use line buttons as quick dials - Ability to query centralized LDAP for directory (I haven't tested this one yet) So, the

Re: [asterisk-users] OT - How to test tftp for phones provisioning

2008-07-27 Thread Ex Vito
So let's say, you've got : a perfectly running tftp server somewhere on your LAN, it holds foo.txt file in its /srv/tftp directory. Which command could you type in for a LAN workstation to receive this foo.txt ? tftp is the client, do you have it installed ?... example: # tftp

Re: [asterisk-users] different gains per channel?

2008-07-26 Thread Ex Vito
I need to have different gain settings on each channel. Is this easy to achieve? txgain, rxgain and many other parameters are defined on a per-channel basis in zapata.conf, they're not global. Each channel definition channel = x assumes previous definitions of such parameters.

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.21 + Realtime Queues = Agents Not Ringing?

2008-06-24 Thread Ex Vito
I recently observed a similar behaviour under 1.4.21. The member was a SIP phone which had its calls forwarded to another SIP phone via its built-in configuration... (fyi: linksys spa922) For some reason, asterisk could not manage this scenario. I still have to test it better to

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.20.1 hang -- extra info + gdb hangs

2008-06-11 Thread Ex Vito
Here is an update, 1. Reviewed 'core show locks' with the help of russellb @ #asterisk-devs last friday 2. Recommended recompilling asterisk with DONT_OPTIMIZE and getting a stack trace with: # gdb /usr/sbin/asterisk $(pidof asterisk) (gdb) set pagination off

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.20.1 hang -- extra info + gdb hangs

2008-06-11 Thread Ex Vito
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try switching from IAX to SIP. Steve, thanks for your suggestion... As you may understand that is not an easy decision to take and implement: we're peering with about 20 other systems within a private network where

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.20.1 hang -- three times in 1.5 days (TC400B at fault ?)

2008-06-06 Thread Ex Vito
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Ex Vito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In Our Heads -- - we're suspecting that the presence of the TC400B is making asterisk behave in different ways that lead to what we're now calling a hang (that is the apparent change in the system since

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.20.1 hang -- three times in 1.5 days (TC400B at fault ?)

2008-06-06 Thread Ex Vito
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Shaun Ruffell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm soon going to petition for this interface to be merged into the trunk, so if you would like to try the branches out now and need any help, please contact me directly. Thanks for you feedback Shaun. I've had a

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.20.1 hang -- three times in 1.5 days (TC400B at fault ?)

2008-06-06 Thread Ex Vito
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Andres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, future possibilities of changing codecs, removing the TC400B or others are open (such as: I guess we enabled the 1st voicemail account as test on the same day that we installed the TC400B -- could it be the change

Re: [asterisk-users] Server recommendation help

2008-05-20 Thread Ex Vito
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Cavanna, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Cards I have installed: Digium TE205P - 5v TDM410 I hear rave reviews about Supermicro but no personal experience. I like

Re: [asterisk-users] dundi network - redundancy / fault tolerance ?

2008-05-09 Thread Ex Vito
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:59 AM, Russell Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ex Vito wrote: Now, how to move on to acheive some kind of fault tolerance ? According to the docs we've studied, DUNDi does not like loops (which we assume one can limit with low enough TTLs). Which documentation

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime status feature - user feedback needed

2008-05-07 Thread Ex Vito
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Benoit Plessis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tilghman Lesher a écrit : Your question leads to this question: why don't you create a proxy application that listens on AMI and populates a database outside of Asterisk, then do all your queries to that database?

[asterisk-users] dundi network - redundancy / fault tolerance ?

2008-05-07 Thread Ex Vito
Hi list, I'm planning a private DUNDi network for a cross-country distributed PBX. Initially it will be composed of about 10 systems, growing to about 20. Current requirements point to a topology of two interconnected DUNDi hubs, each peering with half the PBXs... This would lead

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-21 Thread Ex Vito
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ex Vito wrote: Matthew, ...is there any specific test you'd like us to perform on this revision ? (considering that currently we have no PSTN line to attach to... we can cross-connect

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-21 Thread Ex Vito
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ex Vito wrote: ...when can one expect to have your new code available in a zaptel release ? In the next one or maybe later because the branch you're working on has lots of different things

Re: [asterisk-users] Switch recommendation?

2008-04-21 Thread Ex Vito
We've been very happy with the SRW224Ps we've deployed. (noisy as hell... good for either the datacentre / computer room or for installation in a noise-cancelling cabinet... but then again, are there any PoE switches that aren't ?) -- exvito

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-18 Thread Ex Vito
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just realized where this is coming from. I was attempting to patch this from a different angle, but as soon as you mentioned the drastic difference in load time I realized what had happened. I'm going to make

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-18 Thread Ex Vito
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just updated the branch. Wait about 5-10 minutes in case for the changes to get mirrored, and then try updating and doing it again. Looks better, no more soft lockup and ztcfg time is comparable to

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-18 Thread Ex Vito
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Ex Vito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just updated the branch. Wait about 5-10 minutes in case for the changes to get mirrored, and then try updating and doing it again

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Ex Vito
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ex Vito wrote: Tested with no 4K stack kernel and stackcleanup svn branch zaptel version. Correct, the kernel no longer complains about the soft hangup. However the system still hangs (console

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Ex Vito
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 02:20:57PM +0100, Ex Vito wrote: - Should this be considered a regression ? Yes, it is a regression, and thus a bug. Mattf has already offered you to work with him on resolving

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-16 Thread Ex Vito
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Shaun Ruffell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your stack trace appears to possibly be stack corruption. Could you try either this branch: http://svn.digium.com/view/zaptel/team/mattf/zaptel-1.4-stackcleanup/ Just tried it... Behaviour looks equivalent. Drivers

Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with B410P

2008-04-16 Thread Ex Vito
Could be this... http://www.misdn.org/index.php/FAQ_chan_mISDN#Why_does_the_L1_goes_DOWN_on_my_PMP_Isdn_Link.3F_Or_why_do_i_get_No_free_chan_even_after_group_call_from_chan_misdn_if_dialing_out_on_my_PMP_Link.3F Hmmm... that's a long link. It is the Why does the L1 goes DOWN on my

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-16 Thread Ex Vito
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The softlockup indicator should be benign. It gets called when loaded the firmware for the part since the firmware image is so large and it takes a long time to load. However, I might have a fix for you. Can

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-16 Thread Ex Vito
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One thing also I would like to see is your kernel .config file. Another thing that would for sure remove that warning is to disable the kernel softlockup detector which is giving a false lockup warning in this

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-16 Thread Ex Vito
http://svn.digium.com/view/zaptel/team/mattf/zaptel-1.4-stackcleanup/ Question: - The url you suggest is very similar, are we talking about a different stackcleanup branch ? Try: http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/team/mattf/zaptel-1.4-stackcleanup/ Try the

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-16 Thread Ex Vito
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's the same. Sorry, I sent you that email before I saw his message. I just got an idea for a clever way to make the softlockup detector not complain. I'll let you know when I have a patch to try. ...sure.

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-16 Thread Ex Vito
update with no 4K stack kernel: - The kernel was build from stock centos 5 kernel 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 - The only .config change was to disable the CONFIG_4KSTACKS Tested zaptel-1.4.10, 1.4.9.2 and the stackcleanup svn branch as suggested by Shaun and Mathew. Short: Results are about

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-16 Thread Ex Vito
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One thing you can also do is pass the nosoftlockup kernel parameter into the kernel from the bootloader. That should disable the softlockup detector. Tested with no 4K stack kernel and stackcleanup svn branch

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-15 Thread Ex Vito
Your stack trace appears to possibly be stack corruption. Could you try either this branch: http://svn.digium.com/view/zaptel/team/mattf/zaptel-1.4-stackcleanup/ Or with a kernel that does not have 4K stacks enabled? You can check if your installed kernel does with the following

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-15 Thread Ex Vito
Or with a kernel that does not have 4K stacks enabled? You can check if your installed kernel does with the following command. $ cat /boot/config-`uname -r` | grep 4K # CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not set Opps, forgot to feedback: yes this kernel seems to have CONFIG_4KSTACKS

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-15 Thread Ex Vito
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Al Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: exvito - I know it is a pain in the cahoonkus - but would you consider sharing the OTHER Digium board issues you are having , the recommended steps you were given by Digium to troubleshoot them, and the results ? I think

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Ex Vito
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Mojo with Horan Company, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the sip peer definition, disallow=all allow=g729 allow=ulaw SHOULD work. Asterisk can't transcode g729, so it should fall on ulaw for the ZAP calls. But, when your polycoms talk with each

[asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4.10 regression with TE220B on Proliant DL380 G5 ?

2008-04-14 Thread Ex Vito
Hi list, After a lot of testing + troubleshooting, I guess I'm observing what I am now calling a regression with zaptel 1.4.10 (is it?) As such I call for peer feedback, before either asking Digium install support or filing a bug. Thanks in advance! System: HP Proliant DL380 G5

Re: [asterisk-users] RTP Payload Problem

2008-03-25 Thread Ex Vito
If you are running 1.4, check rtp-packetization.txt under doc/ directory from source distribution. Cheers, -- exvito ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update

Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-03-17 Thread Ex Vito
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Macros are deprecated. Gosubs are the way forward, and yes, they have local variables. Simply define them once as Set(LOCAL(foo)=bar) and foo will be gone when the innermost stack is removed (either by Return or

Re: [asterisk-users] How to find out the IP of the calling party?

2008-03-13 Thread Ex Vito
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Gonzalo Servat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't find any channel variable that gives me this info. Gonzalo, With SIP callers you can get the address from the SIPURI channel variable. IAX does not seem to have an equivalent var... The best I could find is

Re: [asterisk-users] How to find out the IP of the calling party?

2008-03-13 Thread Ex Vito
Improvement: also check the funcions SIPCHANINFO and IAXPEER... With this and the SIPURI channel variable you should be able to have all the info. Cheers, -- exvito ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

Re: [asterisk-users] RedFone foneBRIDGE2 2e1 - anyone used it oranother TDMoE bridge?

2008-03-13 Thread Ex Vito
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which is something not unlike the Junghanns ISDNGuard. ...or the beroNet bero*fos (https://shop.beronet.com/product_info.php/cPath/56/products_id/159) Not affiliated, just a satisfied customer. -- exvito

Re: [asterisk-users] dialstatus and cancelled calls

2008-03-11 Thread Ex Vito
...as long as the destination does not answer you'll get a NO ANSWER disposition. Note, however, that answering can be one of: - Dial a phone and the user answers the phone - Connecting the caller to voicemail, for example, after Dial timed out - Playing an IVR / sound / music

[asterisk-users] Local music on hold -- mohinterpret=passthrough assymetrical ?

2008-03-09 Thread Ex Vito
Hi list, I'm planning and testing a distributed asterisk deployment throughout several sites; each will be connected to the PSTN and all of them among themselves via IAX trunks. Phones will be SIP. I guess I already solved (worked-around, actually) asterisk's codec negotiation

Re: [asterisk-users] Call recording problems from queue

2008-03-05 Thread Ex Vito
I don't have access to an asterisk system right now (nor any other sort of information source) but I seem to recall that from 1.4 onwards the config option for recording queue calls is named differently... Is it mixmonitor ? Check you 1.4 queues.conf sample. PS: I'm not really sure

Re: [asterisk-users] Transferring Unanswered Calls

2008-03-05 Thread Ex Vito
I wouldn't know how to do it the way you mention it, via local channels... Our implementation performs ringing transfers via AMI redirect... The user action is performed on the desktop, not on the ringing phone. -- exvito ___ -- Bandwidth

Re: [asterisk-users] Had it with Dell Garbage

2008-03-04 Thread Ex Vito
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 03:05:43AM +, Ex Vito wrote: ...can you expand on that please ? I'm on my way to getting one of the newer Digium TE220B PCIe dual T1/E1 to put on such a system. How can I tell

Re: [asterisk-users] Had it with Dell Garbage

2008-03-03 Thread Ex Vito
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Joshua Kinard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just don't use T1 cards w/ TigerJet chipsets in them on DL385's (and very likely, 380's as well). I just learned this the hard way. --J ...can you expand on that please ? I'm on my way to getting one of the newer

Re: [asterisk-users] CallerID shows wrong values in manager interface

2008-01-31 Thread Ex Vito
I've struggled with this recently. In short: - Observed behaviour is expected as of asterisk 1.2 and later, as previously described by Mojo - If you want to get the caller id for the channel calling (dialling) into that channel for that specific Newstate: Ringing event, you

Re: [asterisk-users] Possible Conflicts with Junghanns 4 Port BRI and 8 Port Sangoma Analog in Same Box?

2007-11-26 Thread Ex Vito
On Nov 26, 2007 4:06 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if anyone on the list has run a server with both types of cards installed? Results? Again, like Geert, not quite the same, but happily running quad BRI (beronet, HFC based) + TDM400. The BRI is running

[asterisk-users] AMI Newstate Ringing events -- Inconsistent caller id ?

2007-11-23 Thread Ex Vito
explanation and I hope some one can shed some light into this. Thanks a lot in advance for any insights! :) Regards, PS: I can provide simplified traces of the events if needed. -- Ex Vito ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http

Re: [asterisk-users] AMI Newstate Ringing events -- Inconsistent caller id ?

2007-11-23 Thread Ex Vito
On Nov 23, 2007 6:58 PM, Moises Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I added the senddialevent, but not the condition you see below. That one was added by someone else. It seems that determine wheter or not the current extension will be set for outgoing calls. Setting OPT_ORIGINAL_CLID may fix your

Re: [asterisk-users] Help: How to configure SIP domain on SPA942

2007-11-23 Thread Ex Vito
On Nov 20, 2007 6:13 PM, Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I looked at LinksysSPATFTPProv.pdf... It doesn't say, however, how to get the phone's configuration out as a flat XML file. Only how to push the file back into the phone. wget

Re: [asterisk-users] Distributed FAX - How to best complement asterisk ?

2007-10-14 Thread Ex Vito
Hello all, I'd like to thank everyone's input which I'll sumarize and comment on bellow. As in all complex solutions, there are no quick answers and no 100% correct solutions. There are trade-offs to be made among very different possiblities... Of course, the purpose of my original

Re: [asterisk-users] Click to Talk Web Applications with Asterisk

2007-10-10 Thread Ex Vito
On 10/9/07, Senad Jordanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: zoachien wrote: Google for mexuar. Zoa Or look at one that works with MS Windows, Linux or Apple http://www.bicomsystems.com/products/C/P/319/382/ FYI, Mexuar's solution -- Corraleta SDK -- *works* with win, linux and mac, from

[asterisk-users] Distributed FAX - How to best complement asterisk ?

2007-10-10 Thread Ex Vito
Hi list, I'm evaluating a private telephony scenario of about 20 locations - 300 phones, 50 FAX machines. Initial overview points to the installation of asterisk at three locations connected to the PSTN via ISDN PRI. All other locations, small by themselves, would get SIP phones

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk cli - vi keybindings ?

2007-09-24 Thread Ex Vito
On 9/24/07, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:04:05AM +0100, Ex Vito wrote: Is there any way to setup the asterisk cli to use such keybindings ? ... Set in your environment: AST_EDITOR=vi before starting Asterisk. (See main/asterisk.c) Great

[asterisk-users] asterisk cli - vi keybindings ?

2007-09-23 Thread Ex Vito
This might sound lika a small issu, but here it goes: I'm a long time unix user and my shell history usage and editing is configured to use vi keybindings; it's something that's already built into my fingers and using different bindings, like the arrow keys to fetch previous lines,

Re: [asterisk-users] not hearing dtmf tones

2007-08-01 Thread Ex Vito
On 7/31/07, Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to re-create calling sendDTMF in an agi and not hearing the digit either. The above seems to re-create that without the AGI. ...you will have to configure your polycom / sip peer for inband DTMF if you want to hear the tones. --

Re: [asterisk-users] Suppress MusicOnHold in Queue

2007-07-17 Thread Ex Vito
David L. West wrote: I want callers to go into the queue(s) and just hear ringing instead of MOH. Is this possible? ...use option 'r' for the Queue application. For more options, use 'show application queue' at the CLI. Cheers, -- exvito

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_isdn with HFC-compatible

2007-07-17 Thread Ex Vito
Asterisk is loading the chan_misdn and lists mISDN when issueing show channeltypes - however it indicates Devicestate - No. when I look for misdn show stacks, it lists the single port of the ISDN-card, however indicates L2Link DOWN, L1LinkDOWN. so I guess theres something wrong,