Re: [asterisk-users] PRI problem

2009-04-02 Thread Harry Vangberg
I had the exact same problem and errors some time ago (search the archives for PRI dropping #2) using Asterisk 1.4.18, Zaptel and a Digium TE121. I tried all kind of things, had telco technicians come out and whatnot. The solution was two-folded - 1) I reinstalled my server, 2) I updated to

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI dropping #2

2009-03-27 Thread Harry Vangberg
. 2009/3/26 Harry Vangberg ha...@vangberg.name: It's 2 feet from the Nokia network terminal from the telco. 2009/3/26 Jared Smith jsm...@digium.com: On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 20:24 +0100, Harry Vangberg wrote: This sounds like what is happening, and is in order with what one of the technicians said

[asterisk-users] PRI dropping #2

2009-03-26 Thread Harry Vangberg
Hey, I wrote yesterday about PRI dropping, which turned out to just be a regular reset of unused B-channels. This time there's a real issue. As noted earlier I have an ISDN-30 connection, a Digium TE-121 with VPMADT032 echo cancellation. These are my configurations files: == /etc/zaptel.conf

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI dropping #2

2009-03-26 Thread Harry Vangberg
. This sounds like what is happening, and is in order with what one of the technicians said - I was about 20 dB below their amplitude, theirs being 2048. Does this make *any* sense? 2009/3/26 Harry Vangberg ha...@vangberg.name: Hey, I wrote yesterday about PRI dropping, which turned out to just

[asterisk-users] Fwd: PRI dropping #2

2009-03-26 Thread Harry Vangberg
amplitude. The equipment shall react within 12 ms by issuing AIS. This sounds like what is happening, and is in order with what one of the technicians said - I was about 20 dB below their amplitude, theirs being 2048. Does this make *any* sense? 2009/3/26 Harry Vangberg ha...@vangberg.name: Hey

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI dropping #2

2009-03-26 Thread Harry Vangberg
. The equipment shall react within 12 ms by issuing AIS. This sounds like what is happening, and is in order with what one of the technicians said - I was about 20 dB below their amplitude, theirs being 2048. Does this make *any* sense? 2009/3/26 Harry Vangberg ha...@vangberg.name: Hey, I wrote

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI dropping #2

2009-03-26 Thread Harry Vangberg
They didn't show up in the list archive. I'm terribly sorry. 2009/3/26 Steve Howes st...@geekinter.net: The first and second times were sufficient. On 26 Mar 2009, at 19:24, Harry Vangberg wrote: Okay. Trying third time, sorry for that, might just be my mail client, anyways, from voip

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI dropping #2

2009-03-26 Thread Harry Vangberg
It's 2 feet from the Nokia network terminal from the telco. 2009/3/26 Jared Smith jsm...@digium.com: On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 20:24 +0100, Harry Vangberg wrote: This sounds like what is happening, and is in order with what one of the technicians said - I was about 20 dB below their amplitude

[asterisk-users] PRI dropping

2009-03-24 Thread Harry Vangberg
Hello, I have an ISDN-30 connection and a Digium TE-121 with VPMADT032 echo cancellation. Every 30-60 minutes I experience PRI dropping. @@@ /etc/zaptel.conf: loadzone=dk defaultzone=dk span=2,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=32-46 dchan=47 bchan=48-62 @@@ @@@ /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [channels]

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI dropping

2009-03-24 Thread Harry Vangberg
And nevermind. I just noticed that I didn't have warnings this time, and it's perfectly normal. 2009/3/24 Harry Vangberg ha...@vangberg.name: Hello, I have an ISDN-30 connection and a Digium TE-121 with VPMADT032 echo cancellation. Every 30-60 minutes I experience PRI dropping. @@@ /etc

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI dropping

2009-03-24 Thread Harry Vangberg
resetinterval in the /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf? On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Harry Vangberg ha...@vangberg.name wrote: Hello, I have an ISDN-30 connection and a Digium TE-121 with VPMADT032 echo cancellation. Every 30-60 minutes I experience PRI dropping. @@@ /etc/zaptel.conf: loadzone=dk

[asterisk-users] BACKGROUNDSTATUS not available?

2009-03-23 Thread Harry Vangberg
Hello, According to this page: http://bugs.digium.com/svnstats/asterisk/trunk/2006-09.html#298 a BACKGROUNDSTATUS variable was added in 2006 with revision 43814. As far as I can understand it should return different values wether the file played with a Background() command was played through or