James Harper wrote:
I've just posted the patch across to the dev list. I'll post it here if
anyone asks for it, but didn't want to initially, lest the crossposting
gods strike me down from above :)
James
As someone who doesn't appreciate what parts this effects, does this
enhancement mean t
Filippo Carone wrote:
I'm really puzzled and I don't know why it is behaving this way. Any
hints?
Cheers,
fc
A problem I had, although different than this, was caused by having
/etc/zapata.conf as koolstart when they should have been loopstart.
Might be something else to try :).
JES
James MacLean wrote:
Rich Adamson wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. More dissappointing is that the E/F card is
the newer card purchased. Where can I go to see when certain revisions
were released? Surprising that the newer card just purchased (to me)
is the older rev :(.
Paul Redstone wrote:
Hi
We're using three line SIP phones (X-lite), very nice, with Asterisk 1.2
But we want to prevent either direct incoming calls or calls from other
extensions from ringing if the user is
in another incoming call (i.e incoming into the extension), making an outgoing
call
dima wrote:
How can I configure asterisk to switch from my hardphone which is
always up and online, as soon as I register with my notebook's
softphone on the asterisk server?
The target is to receive all calls destinated to my hardphone on my
softphone when it's online.
Any ideas?
I'm just
Rich Adamson wrote:
From: "James B. MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Asterisk*CLI> zap show status
Description Alarms IRQ
bpviol CRC4
Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F Board 1 OK 0 0
Rich Adamson wrote:
I'd suggest removing the majority of the statements and starting out
with very basic definitions, then when things are working reasonably
well, add in other statements (like callerid, etc).
[trunkgroups]
[channels]
signalling=fxs_ks
group = 2
context=mainmenu
channel =>
Rich Adamson wrote:
From: "James B. MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---End of Original Message-
I hope the files that you attached have different names then what
was shown since there is nothing used by * called zap.c
is
difficult to guess at what you've done.
Best guess is that zapata.conf is messed up, and likely associated with
the group (g2) definitions.
From: "James B. MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
My TD400P cards will not dial out until someone dia
Hi Folks,
My TD400P cards will not dial out until someone dials in first. Error is :
-- Executing Dial("SIP/8438-3e69", "Zap/g2/94248438|25|t") in new stack
Nov 27 11:57:12 NOTICE[5599]: app_dial.c:1011 dial_exec_full: Unable to
create channel of type 'Zap' (cause 34 - Circuit/channel congest
ers to know to press #. I don't think
dvlinedetect will quite cut it either. callprogress looked promising,
but, alas, as many others have found, it hangs up after timeout seconds.
I'll keep digging :).
Thanks again everyone,
JES
James B. MacLean wrote:
Hi C F,
I am not well versed
u use c in the
dial command for the zap channel, but then the called person has to
press # to connect the call.
Hope this helps.
On 11/22/05, James B. MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Folks,
Took some effort to even realize what was happening and I did not find
anything obvious in th
Hi Folks,
Took some effort to even realize what was happening and I did not find
anything obvious in the archives or FAQs to explain it.
Simply put, if I have a dial plan that dials to a specific ZAP line (ie
exten => _,n,Dial(Zap/2/${calling}&SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],15,tr))
then both the
13 matches
Mail list logo
