Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 on a MAX/Lucent/Ascend TNT

for this, It will be great. I've wrote this list several times asking for this issue without any answer. If you wonna collaborate, please tell me. Regards, Miguel Amez 2010/6/24 Ben Winslow winsl...@pa.net Hello folks, I've been trying to get T.38 over SIP working with calls terminated by a MAX/Lucent

Re: [asterisk-users] UDPTL T38 via NAT

, Miguel Amez 2010/6/22 marek cervenka cerv...@fpf.slu.cz On 06/22/2010 04:38 PM, marek cervenka wrote: On 06/22/2010 02:51 PM, Johann Steinwendtner wrote: On 2010-06-22 12:36, Remco Bressers wrote: Dear list, I've got the following setup : [FAX-ATA]--[PBX LAN]--[Firewall]--[PBX WAN

Re: [asterisk-users] Little t38 bug?

You are completely right! You are my hero! I'm experiencing the same error with hylafax + t38modem implementation, and t38modem ALLWAYS sends out at 2400!!! I have 1.6.0.22 too, so this is definetly what's happening! 1 month looking for the error and now Alexandru has it...whoa! regards, Miguel

Re: [asterisk-users] Little t38 bug?

Hi Kevin, Thanks for your quick reply. I have been trying to find a good configuration for T38modem + hylafax + asterisk for almost 1 month, and the issue is allways the same: just syncs at 2400 bpps. Help on this issue would be apreciated. Regards, Miguel Amez 2010/5/25 Kevin P. Fleming kpflem

Re: [asterisk-users] VoIP Termination in Japan

don't have any problem with this, they give you really good service. Regards, Miguel Amez 2010/5/5 Adrian Marsh adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com Anyone have any experience with a Japanese local VoIP termination supplier? I’ve emailed a few companies looking to setup some PSTN to SIP and SIP

[asterisk-users] T38 trunk configuration for relay appears to affect default trunks for voip

, take a look at the part that starts with Using UDPTL TOS bits 184. We think its confusing the T38 protocol with normal calls (because UDPTL is used to send T38 faxes). Any light on this would be appreciated. Regards, Miguel Amez

Re: [asterisk-users] sending T.38 fax negotiation problem

this patch take effect? thanks a lot, Miguel Amez. 2010/5/3 Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com On 05/03/2010 11:59 AM, Ilmars Knipshis wrote: Problem in short is as following: after reINVITE from Cisco to negotiate T.38: --- SIP read from UDP:193.110.9.17:5060 --- INVITE sip

Re: [asterisk-users] working example of t38 fax w/ 1.6.2?

App_fax? I didn't hear about that. What's that? Could you please explain that a little bit better? I'm experiencing some troubles with T38modem and would like to solve on the better way. regards, Miguel Amez 2010/5/4 sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com Miguel Amez wrote: Hi Sean, Do you

Re: [asterisk-users] sending T.38 fax negotiation problem

-or-ubuntu-t38modem-1-0-asterisk-1-6/ Have some troubles and compatibility issues. I could give you lots of asterisk logs indeed for the troubles I'm facing with re-Invite. Thanks for the feedback. Regards, Miguel Amez 2010/5/4 Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com On 05/04/2010 06:30 AM, Miguel

Re: [asterisk-users] working example of t38 fax w/ 1.6.2?

Hi Sean, Do you know about t38modem and hylafax? There are lots of wonderfull options with both of them. If you need config files with both of them tell me. See ya 2010/5/2 sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com I can't get a test T.38 fax between 2 1.6.2 machines, using app _fax and spandsp pre17

[asterisk-users] Problems with t38modem and bitrate sent to t38-termination service

with this, I don't know where the problem could be. Any kind of help would be appreciated. Thanks a lot for your time and Implication on this list. Regards, Miguel Amez -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api