[Asterisk-Users] Re: quadBRI in bri_net mode - t3 timer expired

2006-07-02 Thread Sebastian Kayser
* Paul Hewlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 29 June 2006 20:08, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > > i successfully connected our old PBX to an asterisk server with a > > junghanns quadBRI, the quadBRI ports running in bri_cpe_ptmp mode > > connected to the interal PB

[Asterisk-Users] quadBRI in bri_net mode - t3 timer expired

2006-06-29 Thread Sebastian Kayser
Hi all, i successfully connected our old PBX to an asterisk server with a junghanns quadBRI, the quadBRI ports running in bri_cpe_ptmp mode connected to the interal PBX ISDN ports. Now i tried to turn it round as our PBX depends on it for some features and changed one of the quadBRI ports to bri

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Re: E1 hardware for asterisk

2006-05-30 Thread Sebastian Kayser
* Christian Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Regarding echo cancel. Is there someone with hands-on experience > > regarding the echo canceller performance of the Junghanns E1 cards > > compared to for example the Sangoma ones? > > Well - the Junghanns does the echocancel in software and the S

[Asterisk-Users] Re: E1 hardware for asterisk

2006-05-30 Thread Sebastian Kayser
* Christian Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tristan schrieb: > > What would you recommend ? > > > > Digium TE411P, Sangoma A104D, Eicon Diva Cards ? > > Ah - I should have read this bevor my last answer. ;-) > > I personally prefer the Sangoma E1 cards. The work in almost every PCI > system

[Asterisk-Users] Got reject for frame 0, but we only have others!

2006-05-22 Thread Sebastian Kayser
Hi all, what could be the cause for the following messages? May 22 12:44:53 WARNING[3791]: chan_zap.c:8498 zt_pri_error: 2 !! Got reject for frame 0, but we only have others! May 22 12:44:54 WARNING[3791]: chan_zap.c:8498 zt_pri_error: 2 !! Got reject for frame 0, but we only have others! May

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Ringing indication not working as expected

2006-05-18 Thread Sebastian Kayser
* Mimmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for the advice. indications.conf is now existent and > > Asterisk is reloaded but the problem still persists. > Reloaded? Peraphs restarted is better... The reload messages informed about the re-reading of indications.conf. However, even restart does

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Ringing indication not working as expected

2006-05-18 Thread Sebastian Kayser
* Sebastian Kayser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Sebastian Kayser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > are there any caveats regarding ringing indication with Asterisk? > PSTN <-- 3 x BRI --> POTS

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Ringing indication not working as expected

2006-05-18 Thread Sebastian Kayser
* Sebastian Kayser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > are there any caveats regarding ringing indication with Asterisk? > > I have got an asterisk installation with a quadBRI driven by BRIstuff. > Internal phones are various snoms (320 / 360) connected via SIP and > Idefisk sof

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Ringing indication not working as expected

2006-05-18 Thread Sebastian Kayser
* Eric ManxPower Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "R" is not a valid Dial option. Sure about that? My Asterisk installation lists it as a valid option. asterisk*CLI> show application Dial [...] R- indicate ringing to the calling party when the called party indicates [...]

[Asterisk-Users] Ringing indication not working as expected

2006-05-17 Thread Sebastian Kayser
Hi all, are there any caveats regarding ringing indication with Asterisk? I have got an asterisk installation with a quadBRI driven by BRIstuff. Internal phones are various snoms (320 / 360) connected via SIP and Idefisk softphones connected via IAX2. Outgoing calls are "routed" through the Zap i