Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, IAX and NAT issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan) writes: It is solved now It was a problem at the ISP level. some UDP packets filtered.. Pleased you have managed to solve the problem. Simon ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, IAX and NAT issue

Hi Dan, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan) writes: Is your firewall redirecting incoming connections on n.n.n.n:5036 to the Internal Asterisk instance? If you don't see any messages on the inside Asterisk box it's unlikely. More than that... Asterisk is configured as DMZ in the NAT router, so it

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, IAX and NAT issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan) writes: [snip] Now, on the other PBX I have the following in extensions.conf exten = _1XX,1,Dial(IAX/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${EXTEN}) exten = _1XX,2,Hangup exten = _1XX,102,Hangup where n.n.n.n is the external IP address of the NAT router. pspbx is the IAX user

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP REGISTER behavior change: specific domains possible in REGISTER

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Todd) writes: Mark has fixed the REGISTER issues to be more RFC compliant. I've created a new thread so that those of you who got bored with the old thread might read this new one. The feature that has just been added was added a while ago, but now it actually seems

Re: [Asterisk-Users] a few questions about sip implementation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Spencer) writes: Is this correct? I see the 100 Trying on REGISTER frequently, but if it's not valid, we can take it out. It serves no really effective purpose. I think that it's only on REGISTER messaegs that it shouldn't be used. Perhaps previous RFCs didn't

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk confused when interface has multiple addresses?

I have asterisk configured on a machine connected to Internet by a cable modem with a public ip. The same network card has a private lan address which I'm trying to use to play with an asterisk configuration with X-lite or an softip phone. sip.conf has bindaddr=192.168.0.1 [the private address of

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk logging questions

Hello, While logger.conf indicates that you can log to a file I can't see _where_ the logging is sent to (which directory). Looking at the source it seems that the directory used is specified in ast_config_AST_LOG_DIR but I can't see where this variable is defined. Help? I have seen on the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail message as e-mail attachment

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan) writes: I have done a search through the local messages and the problem seems to be that the mail sent by Asterisk use as sender [EMAIL PROTECTED], but this domain is not a registered one, so the destination server does not accept it. I must have a registered

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk logging questions

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Manousos) writes: While logger.conf indicates that you can log to a file I can't see _where_ the logging is sent to (which directory). Looking at the source it seems that the directory used is specified in ast_config_AST_LOG_DIR but I can't see where this

Re: [Asterisk-Users] out of curiosity ..

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven Critchfield) writes: On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 09:31, Dave Alan Caruana wrote: not really asterisk related this, but is it normal for a mail to take so long to be resent through the mailing list server? i'm speaking about 20 minute + delays here .. (or it it

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Getting netmeeting to work with Asterisk

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeremy McNamara) writes: Simon J Mudd wrote: Using the LD_LIBRARY_PATH as you explain appears to be rather a hack. LD_LIBRARY_PATH is a standard Linux environment value, so complain to Linus. I'm aware of what LD_LIBRARY_PATH is for (and that is works on various

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP codecs

functionality. Simon -- Simon J Mudd, Postfix RPM Packager, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: +31-627-592 627, http://postfix.WL0.org ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Getting netmeeting to work with Asterisk

and _exactly_ how one relates to another. Thanks for the suggestion though. I guess I need a _minimal_ configuration of just one or two extensions which connect/relate to one/two netmeeting clients. The fuller configuration files are obviously confusing me. Simon -- Simon J Mudd, Postfix RPM Packager

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Getting netmeeting to work with Asterisk

for your patience. Simon -- Simon J Mudd, Postfix RPM Packager, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: +31-627-592 627, http://postfix.WL0.org ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo

[Asterisk-Users] Sound: Recording overrun

good sound facilities is there a way I can call it from MS Netmeeting or similar? I think Netmeeting supports H323 but can't wokr out how to get it to talk to the Asterisk box. Again any pointer would be appreciated. Thanks. Simon -- Simon J Mudd, Postfix RPM Packager, Amsterdam

[Asterisk-Users] Getting netmeeting to work with Asterisk

(setup_incoming_call): Call from user 'Simon' rejected due to no default context However I am unsure what this really means and how to configure the extensions to allow incoming and outgoing calls to the netmeeting client. Simon -- Simon J Mudd, Postfix RPM Packager, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. email