Branch ?
There are release notes that speak to this.
Where? And is there a release history anywhere?
Read the UPGRADE.txt file in the source distribution of Asterisk.
--
Ulexus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpX6qBT52NKf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of using a net-boot setup (e.g. PXE) for
something like this is that you are then reliant on another machine for
the operation of that one. Considering that you'd probably be relying
on it (and the switch) for normal operations anyway, I would not bother
worrying about it.
--
Ulexus
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:02:08PM +0100, Thorben G. Jensen spake thusly:
I cannot get the transfer button to work on a Snom 190, I cannot get the
# to work either.
I have a Snom 220 with a non-working transfer button. Not sure what the
problem is. Also need to figure out how
the investment had already been made in the BCM by the time
I got Asterisk up and running.
--
Ulexus
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http
...dead end road) and also of the
myopic transfer feature (only designed with two calls in mind).
--
Ulexus
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit
Leandro wrote:
Hi,
I just bought a Rhino Channel Bank to use with my just bought T100P.
Rhino channel bank provide a autoT1 features that try to detect the
framing and maybe the coding of the T1. Unfortunately I tried every
combination of esf, d4 and b89zs and ami without success.
My first
Jeremy Rusnak wrote:
Hi all,
...snip...
We're running SIP and version 3.46 of the phone firmware.
I don't know about this specific problem, but the latest firmware is
3.55. I'd try it. http://www.snom.com/download/share
--
Ulexus
___
Asterisk-Users
Uma S. Pandey wrote:
Hi
I am using Snom 190 with asterisk 1.0.0, and am observing that when I
try to use asterisk voicemail or any application where I need to input
more digits, then , asterisk is not able to get all the digits pressed
from the phone. Can anyone suggest what might be happening?
|192.168.10.2:192.168.10.1)
I have added this as a note to the Wiki:
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+ZapRAS
Ulexus wrote:
I am flailing around here trying to make ZapRAS function reliably with
an asterisk box on both sides. My interpretation of the documentation
calls everywhere, and nothing connects. However, this is
the only configuration I have yet tried that at least _sometimes_ works.
Can anyone shed any light on this process?
Thanks,
--
Ulexus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL
el Flynn wrote:
Lenny Tropiano / asterisk.org Mailing list wrote:
These taken tonight (9/22/2004) at the Expo and Reception
Enjoy. http://photos.tropiano.org/gallery/astricon-2004
Lenny
Anyone knows if those Snom Keypad 220s are available, and where I might
be able to get my hands on a few?
I
Ryan Courtnage wrote:
Hi all,
A while back, there was a short thread on using the FXS interface from a
Primus TalkBroadBand device (a DLink ATA) as a incoming line for the FXO
interface on the TDM400P:
Primus -- DLink ATA FXS -- TDM400P FXO -- Asterisk
In that thread, a couple of people
Deon Rodden wrote:
I've been working with Asterisk for about 2 months now and am doing
well. However I decided to switch platforms from Fedora Core 1, that my
predacessor was using, to Gentoo, for obvious reasons. It just seems
faster and less bloated everything I need, nothing I don't.
Same here. I, too have received replacement cards from Digium, and I have
even tried replacing the proSLICs, all to no avail.
Also to note: the same port on each (of three) cards always goes out first.
On Thursday, 12 February, 2004 19:22, John Vozza wrote:
Same here...
Usually after
I am using 2.03o with a Snom200 with two lines registered without a problem:
However, I am not using any authorization, whih could be where your problem
is.
from my sip.conf:
[5117]
type=friend
host=dynamic
context=sip-gb
mailbox=5117
callerid=Name 5117
On Thursday, 22 January, 2004 16:04,
On Sunday, 18 January, 2004 02:04, Ken Alker wrote:
Assuming the price of an ADSI screen phone (say, Aastra 390) was the same
as an IP screen phone (say, Cisco 7960) and someone was setting up an *
server for their 20 employees (each of whom would have either an ADSI or IP
phone on their
On Friday, 16 January, 2004 12:27, Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 06:47, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
If you value your data, don't use software raid. If you value
performance don't use software raid. If you value uptime/stability
don't use any raid on IDE.
That's pure
On Saturday, 13 December, 2003 11:16, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
...
Directory does not need an escape condition. If you fail to enter
anything within the allotted time (see ResponseTimeout), you jump
to the t extension.
That makes for a rather ill solution for the poor fool (like me, often)
Ollie grabbed my notes of this on his excellent site:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+setup+success+2
As far as for configuration, see that page and the snips below.
from my /etc/zaptel.conf:
--
### Frame to NEGIA (Span 1)
nethdlc=1-24
#
### T1 to Greensboro1 (Span 2)
em=25-28
The directory is generated from the voicemail.conf, so I imagine you would
also have to an entry for extension '#' to voicemail.conf as well.
This seems like a really cheap (if effective and expedient) way of doing it.
Just a note (and I really should add this to bugs.digium.com, I suppose),
,
the specification was) so as not to compete with commercial PBX/phone
offerings.
Finally, this PUBLISH method's pre-RFC draft was just released less than two
months ago.
On Tuesday, 09 December, 2003 23:33, Juan J. Sierralta P. wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 23:06, Ulexus wrote:
After having received my
After having received my brand new SNOM 200 phones and trying to get the
remote extension monitoring to work, if seems that they use the SUBSCRIBE
and PUBLISH SIP methods to do this.
Further, doing a swift grep of the asterisk code, I don't see anything like
this in Asterisk.
Has anyone heard
Just an example, then:
I have, as my first outside production site, just concluded a very (in my
opinion) interesting and educational install as described below. There are
still many tweaks which need to be done, and if anyone has any suggestions
for improvement, I am always
First, the
To try and put it simply, the zaptel drivers will not compile with the
-DZAPTEL_NETWORK flag (as set, not my default, in the Makefile), with any
stock kernel including and after 2.4.21, which is when the new HDLC structure
was imported from the development kernel tree.
Therefore, it should be
I use daemontools ( http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html ).
Here, for instance, is my '/service/asterisk/run' script. You only need the
first uncommented line and the last uncommented line. You can ignore all of
the networking stuff, but I wanted to know, if anyone else happened to see
this, if
This sounds like the fax resolution is incorrect. Basically, there are only
two resolutions for faxes, normal and fine. The only difference in these two
is the number of lines, or the Y dimension. With fine resolution, you
simply have twice the lines. Unfortunately, I do not believe there
Don't forget the equally important host stamp on the file. That allows you
to write two different files at precisely the same time on a shared
filesystem (e.g., NFS) with no race conditions.
On Tuesday, 21 October, 2003 13:37, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
There is a C Library function that will
27 matches
Mail list logo
