Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

2009-10-06 Thread astgroups
Google for some of the How Tos built around Elastix and Trixbox. Both of these are CentOS based as well. good luck. - Original Message - From: James Hankins j...@allpointsmediaworks.com To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on a Beagleboard?

2009-09-23 Thread astgroups
- Original Message - From: Martin asteriskl...@callthem.info To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 11:01:04 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on a

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on a Beagleboard?

2009-09-22 Thread astgroups
Yes. Using Ubuntu, Asterisk with Dahdi. USB to Ethernet HUB and a Redfone fonebridge T1/E1 gateway connected to it. It can process a T1/E1 worth of calls no problem. - Original Message - From: Vincent vincent.delpo...@bigfoot.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [asterisk-users] External PRI Appliance

2009-06-27 Thread astgroups
Try this for understanding the HA piece of the puzzle. http://support.red-fone.com/downloads/elastix/Elastix_HA_Cluster.pdf - Original Message - From: Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent:

Re: [asterisk-users] COSTA RICA - E1

2009-03-04 Thread astgroups
Yes. We have a number of customers in CR connecting to E1 PRIs using the Redfone fonebridge and it works fine. Are you having a particular issue or just looking for general confirmation that Asterisk and E1 in Costa Works? Good luck. - Original Message - From: Luis Morales

Re: [Asterisk-Users] E1/T1 failover hardware

2005-10-28 Thread astgroups
We use the following device for Asterisk fail-over and our T1s. I believe they have an E1 version also: http://www.red-fone.com/fonebridge.html On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 11:23, John Daragon wrote: Warning ! I know zip about electronics. I've been looking for a device to handle the switching of

Re: [Asterisk-Users] web management interface

2005-10-26 Thread astgroups
Common requests from my customers include; -MACs (moves,adds,changes) on extensions (sip, zaptel,CID) -Voice Prompt recording/modifying -CDR Access on the fly -Reboot/halt option -The Multi-tenant functionality would be very nice also.Big market for that. Hope this helps. Good luck! On Wed,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] How to configure the communication between two Asterisk servers

2005-10-25 Thread astgroups
Tielin Xu wrote: Hi All: I have special set up to be done. See anyone can help me some ideas. Two Asterisk servers, server A trunks to PSTN, server B works as call routing engine. All sip phones are registered in server B. I have scenario like following: 1. A call comes to server A, server A

[Asterisk-Users] TDMoE and Badness in Kernel

2005-10-20 Thread astgroups
I'm going to poll the group one more time on this one. I have posted this before and didn't get any takers. Digium advises that I should just do IAX in place of TDMoE but I don't have that luxury. I have a very complex dial plan built around the TDMoE functionality and it would be very

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Soekris and Asterisk

2005-10-11 Thread astgroups
You should look at the Redfone fonebridge product. I believe their product does what you are wanting to do; http://www.red-fone.com/fonebridge.html On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 00:38, Craig Guy wrote: Has anyone on the list used a Soekris engineering PC as a TDM - Ethernet bridge? For example

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDMOE Badness in kernel...

2005-10-05 Thread astgroups
I'm seeing the same behavior on a Debian system with 2.6.12. I have two systems with Digium Quad T1s in each and I trunk them with TDMoEThis always worked great on 2.4 and up to 2.6.8 but beyond that it either spits out copious amounts of kernel badness and paralyzes the system completely or

[Asterisk-Users] TDMoE + kernel badness

2005-09-29 Thread astgroups
Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c on 2.6.X I'm seeing this on Kernel 2.6.+ implementations, namely Centos 4.1 machines while trying to do TDMoE trunks between two machines. 2.4 Kernel operates fine on the same hardware I'm compiling zaptel-1.0.9.2 as per instructions in

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: equipment configuration help

2005-09-03 Thread astgroups
Erick Perez wrote: So, with this i solve the issue on main office. But what about the two remote? they are so little that they will not let me place another * box there. The phones will be SIP and they are like this INTERNET--PIX--LAN(machines and sip phones). The pixes in those two offices