Re: ***SPAM*** [Asterisk-Users] Are Shares of This Issue Poised For a Run? - The Source

2006-01-25 Thread Bob Goddard
On Tuesday 24 Jan 2006 22:51, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Terry Gilsenan wrote: Can we get that IP blocked in the postfix access list at digium? (lists.digium.com [69.16.138.164])? Ozemail are not what you would call active in stopping spam. The list had no incoming spam filtering for some

Re: ***SPAM*** [Asterisk-Users] Are Shares of This Issue Poised For a Run? - The Source

2006-01-25 Thread Jean-Michel Hiver
Unfortunately, that is the least of the spam problems. Spammers have subscribed to the list and are harvesting the addresses. I would prefer all emails coming from the list to cloak the original posters email address. So you can't reply directly? As if the broken reply-to wasn't enough...

Re: ***SPAM*** [Asterisk-Users] Are Shares of This Issue Poised For a Run? - The Source

2006-01-24 Thread Terry Gilsenan
All, from the headers...: Received: from 69.16.138.164 (unknown [203.11.174.9]) by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CA021CB12; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:29:46 -0700 (MST) Googling on this IP:203.11.174.9 reveals a source of heaps of reported spam..:

Re: ***SPAM*** [Asterisk-Users] Are Shares of This Issue Poised For a Run? - The Source

2006-01-24 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Terry Gilsenan wrote: Can we get that IP blocked in the postfix access list at digium? (lists.digium.com [69.16.138.164])? Ozemail are not what you would call active in stopping spam. The list had no incoming spam filtering for some time; that has now been fixed.