On 03:10, Sat 04 Mar 06, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:25:40PM -0700, Damon Estep wrote:
Try nat=yes and qualify=yes in sip.conf.
So a call between two SIP phones will have to go through the remote
server? Or can those two phones be aware of each other?
Yes. But without
The problem is the remote server. Asterisk is able to drop the media stream and
allow the SIP phones to communicate directly, which has both its drawbacks and
advantages depending on how you plan to use asterisk. For this to take place
you'll need the planets to be in the proper alignment and
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:25:40PM -0700, Damon Estep wrote:
Try nat=yes and qualify=yes in sip.conf.
So a call between two SIP phones will have to go through the remote
server? Or can those two phones be aware of each other?
(If so: how do they know that they are behind the same NAT?)
--
8:10 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] A room full of Cisco 7960s behind NAT
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:25:40PM -0700, Damon Estep wrote:
Try nat=yes and qualify=yes in sip.conf.
So a call between two SIP phones will have to go through the remote
server? Or can
Bill Gibbs wrote:
Without using something like SER I don't think that's possible.
Reinvite probably uses the default SIP ports (and thus won't work with
NAT dynamically) right?
Use an outbound proxy. SER can be configured as an outbound proxy or use
a dedicated outbound proxy like siproxd.
My main problem local servers is that I need to (a) be able to forward
voicemails between users at multiple locations and (b) have all the message
waiting lights working.
Otherwise I'd be doing just that.
Meanwhile I'll check out qualify=yes - I already have nat=yes.
We have several
: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 5:51 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] A room full of Cisco 7960s behind NAT
My main problem local servers is that I need to (a) be able to forward
voicemails between users at multiple locations and (b
--On Wednesday, March 01, 2006 3:00 AM -0600 Rich Adamson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 7960 SIPDefault.cnf has a line like this:
; nat_enable: 0 ; 0-Disabled (default), 1-Enabled
to control the nat function at the phone.
Since I'm not the OP but do have multiple 7960's
--On Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:53 AM -0500 Alexander Lopez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have about 10 cisco 7960/40 behind a Nat router no problem.
They work with all features.
Alexander...
Can you post or mail to me the relevant contents of your SIPXXX.cnf files?
Also, can you post
I need to set up an office full of Cisco 7960 phones behind NAT with the
server out in Colo.
The first test phone registers fine, but the second one does not register.
The first phone's registration looks like so:
/SIP/Registry/3115552368
Ed Greenberg wrote:
I need to set up an office full of Cisco 7960 phones behind NAT with
the server out in Colo.
The first test phone registers fine, but the second one does not
register.
The easiest way to do this is put an Asterisk server on the local side,
have the phones register to it
Try nat=yes and qualify=yes in sip.conf.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed
Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 3:30 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] A room full of Cisco 7960s
Doug Lytle wrote:
Ed Greenberg wrote:
I need to set up an office full of Cisco 7960 phones behind NAT with
the server out in Colo.
The first test phone registers fine, but the second one does not
register.
The easiest way to do this is put an Asterisk server on the local side,
have the
My main problem local servers is that I need to (a) be able to forward
voicemails between users at multiple locations and (b) have all the message
waiting lights working.
Otherwise I'd be doing just that.
Meanwhile I'll check out qualify=yes - I already have nat=yes.
Thanks,
/edg
--On
, February 28, 2006 5:51 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] A room full of Cisco 7960s behind NAT
My main problem local servers is that I need to (a) be able to forward
voicemails between users at multiple locations and (b) have all the
message
I've tried it both ways with no noticeable change.
--On Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:25 PM -0700 Damon Estep
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your posted config had nat=1, not nat=yes. Are they interchangeable? I
thought I remembered nat=1 either doing something a little different or
not doing
full of Cisco 7960s behind NAT
I've tried it both ways with no noticeable change.
--On Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:25 PM -0700 Damon Estep
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your posted config had nat=1, not nat=yes. Are they interchangeable?
I
thought I remembered nat=1 either doing something
Ed Greenberg wrote:
My main problem local servers is that I need to (a) be able to forward
voicemails between users at multiple locations and (b) have all the
message waiting lights working.
Otherwise I'd be doing just that.
Connect the remote office to the main office via OpenVPN.
Doug
Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] A room full of Cisco 7960s behind NAT
I need to set up an office full of Cisco 7960 phones behind
NAT with the server out in Colo.
The first test phone registers fine, but the second one does
not register.
The first phone's registration looks like
Ed Greenberg wrote:
I need to set up an office full of Cisco 7960 phones behind NAT with
the server out in Colo.
The first test phone registers fine, but the second one does not
register.
The first phone's registration looks like so:
/SIP/Registry/3115552368
On Feb 28, 2006, at 9:51 PM, Andres wrote:
Ed Greenberg wrote:
I need to set up an office full of Cisco 7960 phones behind NAT with
the server out in Colo.
The first test phone registers fine, but the second one does not
register.
The first phone's registration looks like so:
21 matches
Mail list logo
