Hi,
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001193
First of all thanks
for doing this. Now we can play with any VoIP g/w in the same level field. Being
a new user always wondered why there is no radius support in
asterisk.
Sorry for the stupid
question; Why is this in bug note.
Doug Harris wrote:
First of all thanks for doing this. Now we can play with any VoIP g/w
in the same level field. Being a new user always wondered why there is
no radius support in asterisk.
RADIUS is absolutely not necessary... We have countless gateways (5300s,
Qunitum, etc) running
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 14:13, Doug Harris wrote:
Hi,
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001193
First of all thanks for doing this. Now we can play with any VoIP g/w
in the same level field. Being a new user always wondered why there is
no radius support in asterisk.
Steven Critchfield wrote:
Maybe you should read and understand the comments on licensing. Maybe a
going over the licensing threads here would also be needed.
For the short story, Digium dual licenses asterisk. There is a GPL
license for those of us that don't need proprietary support, and then
complicated for Digium.
Derek Samford
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy McNamara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: There is no FORK! (WAS Re: [Asterisk-Users] BETA RADIUS support
for Asterisk)
Steven Critchfield wrote:
Maybe
Message-
From: Jeremy McNamara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: There is no FORK! (WAS Re: [Asterisk-Users] BETA RADIUS support
for Asterisk)
Steven Critchfield wrote:
Maybe you should read and understand the comments on licensing
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 15:42, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
Steven Critchfield wrote:
Maybe you should read and understand the comments on licensing. Maybe a
going over the licensing threads here would also be needed.
For the short story, Digium dual licenses asterisk. There is a GPL
license for
Thanks Steven
Dough
Fairly appropriate sig.
Didn't you notice my email handle :)
Well I will wait for dbruce for my specific questions on how to use it.
Thanks
D.Harris (new sig.)
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 05:01:38PM -0500, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
That fact is not the problem. It the fact that there is no FORK of
Asterisk that Digium secretly maintains. This is how rumors get
started.
If memory serves, you were the one who started that rumour.
I remember you claiming
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 15:53, Doug Harris wrote:
Thanks Steven
Dough
Fairly appropriate sig.
Didn't you notice my email handle :)
Yes, I understood what it was for. A former boss used dough for his
email when his doug address was over run with spam. It took a few of us
pointing out the
This is why disclaimers are important for those who
contribute patches. If there isn't a disclaimer, Digium can not include
it in the proprietary version of asterisk. If they can not include it in
the proprietary version, they tend to not allow it in their version of
the GPL releases so they
Jeremy, I am really not interested in rehashing this again.
You know my views on the matter, I know yours. We disagree.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:04:52PM -0500, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
I seem to recall your http://www.gnutel.com publicly discussing a fork
of Asterisk.
This is no secret
12 matches
Mail list logo
