On 13:48, Tue 04 Apr 06, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Digium's not in the business of selling connectivity. :-) But yes, I cannot
say enough good things about the S518. I love these things. Having the
outgoing packet queue in the kernel and under direct control also lets you
get much closer
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 16:23, Michiel van Baak wrote:
Does this thing work under OpenBSD ?
ftp://ftp.sangoma.com/OpenBSD/current_wanpipe
I believe so, yes.
-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:17 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compatible Asterisk
Connectivity Cards : Sangoma
On Monday 03 April 2006 12:09, mustardman29 wrote:
NO IRQ INTERRUPT ISSUES ON THE SANGOMA CARDS. THIS ALONE IS A GOOD
ENOUGH REASON
, 2006 8:17 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compatible Asterisk
Connectivity Cards : Sangoma
On Monday 03 April 2006 12:09, mustardman29 wrote:
NO IRQ INTERRUPT ISSUES ON THE SANGOMA CARDS. THIS ALONE IS A GOOD
ENOUGH REASON.
The Sangoma cards
On 16:35, Tue 04 Apr 06, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 16:23, Michiel van Baak wrote:
Does this thing work under OpenBSD ?
ftp://ftp.sangoma.com/OpenBSD/current_wanpipe
I believe so, yes.
I'm ordering one right now !
My provider only gives me pppoa and no modem is
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 12:29, Jim Hanlon wrote:
I used the Sangoma S518 card in an IBM x-series server, replacing a telco
supplied ADSL modem/router. It is obviously more expensive than the
...
Digium offers nothing comparable, so I can't comment on the relative merits
of their hardware.
Andrew wrote:
Digium's not in the business of selling connectivity. :-) But yes, I
cannot say enough good things about the S518. I love these things.
Having the outgoing packet queue in the kernel and under direct
control
also lets you get much closer to your rated upstream bandwidth and
On Thursday 06 April 2006 14:02, Dan Austin wrote:
One idea I suggested to Sangoma, and it sounds like there are at least
a few people here that might back the concept. I also love my S518, and
would love it more if it was available as an option on the FXO module
for the A200.
Yes, an S518
2006/4/3, mustardman29 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
NO IRQ INTERRUPT ISSUES ON THE SANGOMA CARDS.THIS ALONE IS A GOOD ENOUGHREASON.I thought (but I'm not an expert) IRQ issues were consecutive to zaptel driver.Why would these card avoid IRQ issues ?
Cheers
___
Olivier Krief wrote:
2006/4/3, mustardman29 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
NO IRQ INTERRUPT ISSUES ON THE SANGOMA CARDS. THIS ALONE IS A GOOD
ENOUGH
REASON.
I thought (but I'm not an expert) IRQ issues were consecutive to zaptel
driver.
Why would these card avoid
On Monday 03 April 2006 12:09, mustardman29 wrote:
NO IRQ INTERRUPT ISSUES ON THE SANGOMA CARDS. THIS ALONE IS A GOOD ENOUGH
REASON.
The Sangoma cards are historically MUCH better about being able to share
interrupts than the Digium cards have been. However, I have personally run
across one
] On Behalf Of
Heidi Mendoza
Sent: Monday, 3 April 2006 13:42
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Compatible Asterisk Connectivity
Cards : Sangoma
Hello List!
I wanted to share to everyone the following compatible
connectivity products that my company
On 4/2/06, Heidi Mendoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List!I wanted to share to everyone the following compatibleconnectivity products that my company installed in our
Asterisk based soft switch. I already sent these tothe Asterisk.org site many days ago but for somereason they still have to
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 07:19 -0500, Brian Roy wrote:
On 4/2/06, Heidi Mendoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List!
I wanted to share to everyone the following compatible
connectivity products that my company installed in our
Asterisk based soft
Pete Barnwell wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 07:19 -0500, Brian Roy wrote:
On 4/2/06, Heidi Mendoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List!
I wanted to share to everyone the following compatible
connectivity products that my company installed in our
Asterisk
I wanted to share to everyone the following compatible
connectivity products that my company installed in our
Asterisk based soft switch. I already sent these to
the Asterisk.org site many days ago but for some
reason they still have to post it.
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compatible Asterisk Connectivity Cards :
Sangoma
I wanted to share to everyone the following compatible
connectivity products that my company installed in our
Asterisk based soft switch. I
PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compatible Asterisk Connectivity Cards :
Sangoma
I wanted to share to everyone the following compatible
connectivity products that my company installed in our
Asterisk based soft
: Monday, April 03, 2006 8:51 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Compatible Asterisk
Connectivity Cards : Sangoma
I've never had issue with the Digium cards in testing and as
we're looking forward to production
On Monday, April 03, 2006 5:51 PM Andrew Kirch wrote:
I've never had issue with the Digium cards in testing and as we're
looking forward to production systems what compelling reason do I
have to pick Sangoma? (I'm not looking for a flame-fest here, but
Never used either card myself but
mustardman29 wrote:
The Sangoma has a very nice mechanical design on their new analog cards that
will fit into standard PC cases or 2U rack mount cases. Don't know about
the Digium as it's a nonstandard oversized card that takes up one full
length PCI slot and then some.
This is
Hello List!
I wanted to share to everyone the following compatible
connectivity products that my company installed in our
Asterisk based soft switch. I already sent these to
the Asterisk.org site many days ago but for some
reason they still have to post it.
1. Sangoma A101 single port E1/T1/PRI
22 matches
Mail list logo
